Tl;dR: GQ posted an article about men kissing and called actors, singers, celebrities "straight men" in the title. People in comments are attacking them for assuming sexuality, specifically for Hudson/Connor (even though it was an umbrella and for more than just them) and even calls it biphobic. Do y'all believe them assuming the actors/singers/etc. are straight is bad? biphobic? tasteless and the article needs to come down? Is it really that bad or are all the people in the comments hyper sensitive?
I had seen a post by GQ on Instagram, they were posting part of an article. In it they were talking about how guy-on-guy kisses are becoming common amongst singers, actors, etc. They even said,
"When two conventionally attractive guys share a kiss outside of the context of a possible romantic relationship, the mania is reminiscent of the way America felt about two conventionally attractive women kissing 20 years ago."
They quoted kisses like Harry Styles and Ben Marshal, Alexander Skarsgård and Pedro Pascal, Heated Rivalry, and Zach and Bryce from love island. I didn't see anything problematic with the post, I actually found it interesting. Its not like they called the celebrities gay. They were simply mentioning how a bunch of seemingly straight men were kissing each other platonically. They said, "Love Island's Zach and Bryce aren't queer; they're bros." and quoted Harry Styles saying, "Now that's queer baiting." There wasn't any sexuality assumptions except the title.
"Why We Can't Get Enough of Two Straight Guys Who Want to Kiss"
Apparently everyone who view the post got stuck on that title. Sure there were 12.2k likes and 169 repost. But there were also 1.9K comments and all the top comments were criticizing them. Someone called the article weird, someone else said "Posting this in 2026 is a CHOICE." I'm assuming bc of the whole Two Straight Guys in the title. Others call it weird, said take it down, its embarrassing, its weird, called them out of touch with reality. One guy claimed they were trying to feminize men even more. But his replies roasted him. Point is, all these opinions has 100-1200 likes.
The biggest comments I noticed most however were people claiming they assumed the guys sexualities.
"'The two haven't publicly labelled their sexuality.' But you decided you could on their behalf?"
Everyone replied, "this," and "thankyou," but all caps. I was so confused bc I didn't see any labeling. Someone else commented "What straight Guys????" and "assuming anyone's sexuality in the big year of 2026?... do better." somebody claimed it to be heteronormative way of thinking and that they should stop. Sure its heteronormative. But the comment that hooked me most was
"Why are you just assuming you know their sexuality? Neither Hudson or Connor have publicly said they're straight. Hudson having a gf doesn't necessarily mean he's straight Bisexual men exist."
btw a lot of comments that were made about these Hudson or Connor guys were under that umbrella. Except in the article it was about more than just those 2 but I think everyone got stuck on them, and somehow believed the declaration was only for them. Anyways a reply under there comment was
"i agree 100%. biphobic people are horrible..."
That's the one that lead me to make this post. To be frank I don't think its biphobic at all. Now idk who these Connor or Hudson guys are. and why so many people care that they are declared straight. I'm assuming they're the actors for heated rivalry (which i have on my list) but I don't know why everyone declares they can't be straight bc they haven't declared it. They haven't declared they're gay either. the Hudson has a gf. I've experienced my fair share of actors behaving queerly. I enjoy Thai gl. every relationship are actors who were paired up to bait the fans. behave gay. if that actor is a main character in a romance, their pair is there partner. My favorite pairing, we the fans believe, one of them is straight. They have a boyfriend even if they behave sapphic, it is their job. Sorry they're actors. Ofc we wish they were queer, but we don't get butt hurt if an article puts them under a straight umbrella alongside 50 other actors unless they themselves claimed they aren't straight.
That was all the context, here's the questions. Do y'all actually have problem if a journalist assumes an actor/singer/etc. is straight when as far as we've seen, other than their roles, they haven't behaved queerly? Do y'all really think its biphobic? That in 2026 you can't assume someone's straight? Like ik its heteronormative, but the truth is most of the population is straight. Most actors, singers, celebrities are straight. That's just reality. Sorry. The likely option is that they're hetero. Do y'all get this offended by a journalist assuming that people in field full of straight people, is straight?
I feel even if someone said they don't assume straightness, unconsciously in your day to day, your assumptions are probably heteronormative.
The Post:
https://www.instagram.com/p/DbDQHJ7DO9l/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link
Sources I looked at to make sure I'm not making this post with the main mentioned actors being gay the whole time. Because that would just be bad:
ELLE Magazine
r/fauxmoi Reddit linking/quoting variety article
Hudson Williams Isn't Queerbaiting, He's Just Not Gay by imuRgency YouTube