Ahoy Captains!

• You want to know if your Stats are good?
• You want be be Stat Roasted?
• You want to show your Stats in general?
• You want to share your Arena/Ranked Stats?
• You want to share your awesome game Results?
• You want to share your economy screen?

Good news!

Slap them in here and all those who are Interested can take a look and give Feedback.

I suspected that the Schroeder was going to be there but not the Yugumo, I panicked and popped the first few torps too far forward, could've had the double strike. Still one of my best ranked moments though.

I did end up burning the Yugumo down just a few seconds after this clip.

All of that just to barely take A then immediately retreat when the majority of red gets there. Proceeds to all die leaving me the only person alive. Then me and a USS Alabama proceed to ram each other head on.

Anybody else like that you have to grind for ships needed for projects or is just me? Like for the C. Colombo, I like the fact that I had to grind for the needed. Started with one Italian bb now I'm grinding for Lepant. It keeps me focused

I’m not talking reworking the challenges or how many medals it gives you. In my opinion those are fine and you can progress pretty fast in the battlepass in comparison to other games.

My main issue is the tediousness of it. Why is each challenge locked behind a challenge? Why can’t we just complete all of them at the same time? It honestly makes zero sense to me and it gives off the air of artificially inflating the grind of all it.

All this does is make me annoyed especially when I’m trying to go for a certain challenge but I get into a streak of bad matches. Theres been numerous times where I finish a challenge during a match, die early and then start up a new match to work on the next challenge just for it not to count. Why???

I just see zero reason as to why it isn’t like the Weekly challenges.

TLDR: Weekly Havoc should allow you to complete all challenges at the same time. There shouldn’t be a lock mechanic.

Me and the teammates who spawned on A side died to overwhelming firepower trying to take it. Checked map to see where the rest of the team was to see these absolute specimens of battleship captains. Good game lads I guess.

u dont really like it, but you play it cuz you payed much… then u realize its good ? 😂

😂😂😂🥳 … like BURROWS

I just got the thunderer and it is 10x better than the kremlin!!

So I’ve got this little free ship, gave it a whirl in Standard. Only 4 ships in the match, no A.I. which was nice

But I’ve only got Murray at 7/1. How do I get Waller? Can’t buy him. Commander crates only?

Why so many of you with 16/4 Waller playing at T2? now that I’m paying attention. You’re the seal clubbers with super low win rates?

I dont know if this idea has been posted before but I kept thinking about it while playing. I attached a short video to kinda show what I mean.

Right now like 90% of our matches are basically capture the base. Doesn't matter if its domination or standard, they all end up feeling pretty similar after thousands of games.

My idea is a completely different mode based on territory control

Instead of the minimap being around 100 large squares, imagine the exact same map size but divided into something like 1,000-2,000 much smaller tiles

Whenever a blue team ship sails through neutral territory, those tiles become blue. Red team does the same on their side. The match UI would constantly show something like:

Blue: 24% map control
Red: 31% map control

If blue reaches something like 70% control they instantly win. Or of course by wiping out the enemy team like normal.

The interesting part is what this would do to gameplay.

DDs suddenly have an actual reason to keep moving around the map instead of sitting in smoke forever.
Cruisers hiding behind the same island for 12 minutes would eventually have to move if they want their team to keep up in map control.
BBs spending the whole match reversing on the J line farming damage would actually have to leave their comfort zone.
Teams couldn't just abandon an entire flank because giving away huge chunks of territory would actually matter.

I think matches would become way more dynamic. More pushes, more flanking, more fights breaking out all over the map instead of everyone staring at the same island for 10 minutes waiting for somebody else to make the first move.

It would also reward map awareness instead of just raw damage farming. Sometimes the right play isn't another 15k salvo, its taking control of another section of the battlefield.

Maybe 70% is too much. Maybe 60% would work better. Maybe the percentages need balancing. Thats all adjustable.

I just think WoWS Legends could really use one mode that encourages movement instead of camping.

Would you actually play something like this or would it end up being a complete mess? I'm honestly curious what you guys think.

EOP Worcester, full fire build with Scott. Only 2 fires out of 74 shells… I did not fire any AP shells, just He

Seriously, for those of us that have put in enough time, "dues" or Dubloons to even HAVE a Tier VIII.... RANKED getting to 1st ranked only 1000 Steel Badges?..... Dafuq?!?!

COME ON MAN. FOR REAL? FOR HONEST AND FOR TRUE?!

I'm going to take a break from this for a long while now ... RPG's seem to be calling my name now, for a bit.

I love getting to do this when the match is (hopefully) in the bag. I knew the two cruisers were there but the DD was a nice windfall.

Ahoy Captains!

What about the Game makes you rage so hard that you want to smash your controller into the TV?

Give us your rage and blow off Steam!

Remember: You're angry! So:

CAPS- LOCK ON AND SHOUT IT OUT LOUD!

# For extra Loud Rage!

For the Rules:

• ALL COMMENTS HAVE TO BE CAPS ONLY
• Subreddit Rules apply to this Thread
• No direct Shaming (e.g. player XY is stupid, XY console players are stupid and so on)
• No profile links (other redditors/WG Staff)
• No Image or Video links

The votes will be hidden in here, as we don\u2019t want to create a contest, who\u2019s rage is more raging \ud83d\ude09

(Some like to discuss about feedback, but the core \u201cMission\u201d of this Format is to blow off Steam, with the Side Effect, that negative feedback is gathered in one spot- it\u2019s optional and don\u2019t interfere with ANYONES right to post feedback outside of this Thread)

But now fellow captains, head on and STONE THE CROWS!

Was thinking about dropping doubloons on one of the Star Trek commanders, but not sure which are worth it? I don’t play a lot of Japanese BB’s bit was thinking about the Borg Queen. Maybe Picard but I’m a semi-retired CV player.

Is there anyone that sticks out to you, or has an inspiration that is worth it? Only commander I’ve bought so far is Bismarck for secondary shenanigans. Have a decent chunk of dubs sitting around though, was thinking of grabbing one commander per cycle.

PS I did not realize the 3 letter abbreviation of Japanese was offensive, my bad! 😅

Title. Got my GXP up, time for a new boat. I have a variety of boats in my port, and consider myself decent all around (constantly top 4 in my team).

Which of these boats will give me more carry potential?

Commanders I plan on using would be Blue Furiora or Sa Zhenbing.

I call it the Shimakaze game, every time you see one in a legendary match, take a shot

I just started playing this awesome game and i must say wow its soo much better than blitz its not even funny

I have the osbourne and i am working my way through japanese BBs

I purchased a minor amount of doubloons and i am currently wondering before i pull any trigger:

What are decent or even foolproof ships (mainly BBs, but any survivable ship suggestions will be greatly appreciated..)

Around tier IV-VI (thats not a keyboard emoji lol even though it looks like it, *tier 4 through 6*) and around 6,250 - 10,000 gold/doubloons..

Ive already heard really great things about guilio cesare and hyuga so im already considering those

Whats a very VERY tanky premium ship in that price and tier range?

Are there any ships that have ironclad trait aswell as either a “guns aplenty” or “big guns” trait?

Thanks, im really new and this game has so many cool mechanics that it kind of gets confusing lol

Overall is dispersion or grouping generally better point for point? I’m not a big battleship player but I’ve been recently working up the American lines and I was wondering about inspirations for an accuracy build. I’m using Cunningham as the first but for the second I’m considering Iachino (at 9/2) vs the new Spanish commander, Ferrandiz y Nino(at 8/1). I’m just not clear on which stat works out better in the long run.

I’m a long time player and I play a lot of the French BBs. I enjoy champagne & JB, is Gascogne worth the GXP?

JB is point and shoot, and Champagne is almost just a big cruiser. Super accurate guns, fast, MBRR, meh armor…. How does Gascogne vary from Champagne?

Unironically Karl Johan is pretty solid for ranked, was by all means surprisingly enjoyable. It’s something different, which I think is fun.

I posted this elsewhere but reposting because I uploaded video and took a screenshot. Not sure how to get video on my iPad from Xbox.

In the clip, Ranked, two DDs remain, blue’ cap B is capped, cap A is vacant.

I thought red DD was going after cap A, because this moment, nothing indicating the cap was being contested as per the clip.

Red DD was actually unspotted behind island, red dd appears, smokes me.

Yes, my reaction time was poor, but didn’t think this ship could take 6000 HP out of me in one volley either.

Is the absence of indication the cap was being contested a bug?