Eight years after the handover of Macau, the public security situation and its economy has increased greatly, as a result, the people of Macau became bolder in expressing their opinions. At the time, Macau was plagued with issues on foreign workers and housing prices etc. In addition, in 2005, the then Secretary of Transport and Public Works was arrested for corruption amidst allegations of the government siding with the developers. As a result, the people of Macau were at their boiling point when they headed into their annual May Day Protest.

The organizers submitted a route plan to the Macau Public Security Police Force, however it was rejected and changed on grounds that it was too dirsruptive to traffic and quality of life. The organizers and the PSPF each insists that their route was the way the protest would go and the conflict wasn't resolved when the day of the protest arrived. As a result, when the protest reached the point of deviation between both parties, the protesters attempt to breakthrough police lines. In an attempt to control the crowd, a Security Police officer fired his revolver towards the air five times (some say he did so at his superior's orders), the first time in 17 years. This successfully aggravated the situation and the protestors punched through the first police line by throwing bamboo sticks and plastic bottles. The police was able to disperse most of the crowd with pepper spray and cleared everyone out at 8.p.m.

Somehow, one of the bullets fired by the officer flew over the fifth tallest mountain in Macau (60.7 metres tall) and struck a motorcyclist 300 metres away. This caused a large uproar obviously but the then Secretary of Security insisted the officer took proper action. However, he was transferred to the fleet services after the incident, which is an unarmed position. In 2009, he was able to pass his sergeant's exam.

In an attempt to placate the anger, the Government of Macau launched a "Wealth Partaking Scheme" in 2008, each Macau citizen would receive a disbursement of 10,000 Macau dollars each year. (1236.90 USD) Due to the close proximity of the two incidents, the officer would be jokingly referred as the "Father of the Wealth Partaking Scheme".

I'm not sure this is gonna end up warranting a mega - but it seems to be fairly "Reddit Ragey" at the moment, so why not.

This will be our thread for the recent (July 22nd) OIS in Madison, WI.

Not much is yet known *factually*, but it appears it started out as a call for a vehicle prowler, who subsequently fled on bicycle, then fought arresting officers. At some point, a large knife (which can be seen in photos) was brought into the picture, and, based on current statements, at least one officer was injured by it.

The video isn't terribly pretty - but, in the words of Shania - "That don't impress me much"

On May 4, 1949, the then largest Hong Kong Police vessel, Police Launch No.1 departed from the Marine Police dockyards in the Yau Ma Tei Typhoon Shelter in West Kowloon (Picture 2) to head into Mirs Bay, northeast Hong Kong (Nautical charts in picture 3) for its regular patrol mission. At the time, the Hong Kong-Chinese border was an extremely dangerous place, there were many cases of pirate attacks, armed thugs and even communist militias crossing the border to kill police officers and taking their weapons. As a result, officers stationed at the border were very heavily armed, inspectors stationed there were even trained to use Bren guns, grenades and 3-inch mortars. In this instance, however, it would be two officers who launched the attack.

The launch was commanded by a British inspector and a sub-inspector, with 21 crew members on board. Around 2 a.m. on May 6, two of the crew members, the mutineers arrived to their duty post, which was to guard the armoury keys. Half an hour later, they unlocked the armoury and each took a Bren gun. They first destroyed the radio system, then they sneaked into the officers quarters and killed the two inspectors. They then advanced into the cabins and locked al the crew members in there, then, they forced one of the helmsman to the cockpit. Meanwhile, the now highest-ranking officer, a corporal heard the commotion and loudly asked what's going on, and was immediately shot dead. The other helmsman on duty attempted to resist but was gunned down as well. The mutineers then attempted to locate the boatswain which they had beef with but failed, and they turned to looting their colleagues.

The launch was then sailed close to the border (left of the blue Chinese words), but the ship was beached before they could cross it. As a result, they locked the helmsman back into the quarters and tooke whatever valuables and weapons they can take. They then fled northeast across the border into Yim Tin (above the blue Chinese words) Reports indicated that two Bren guns, five rifles (likely Lee-Enfields) and five pistols (likely Webley revolvers) and ten crates of ammo were taken. The police issued a bounty of 20,000 HKD (100k to 190k USD in today's value) for the mutineers' capture. There were news that some involved people were arrested but unfortunately there were no detailed records of it.

7 years later, in 1956, an armourer with the Royal Electrical and Mechanical Engineers Command Workshop in Kowloon discovered a Bren gun with the serial number "HKP004". After contacting the Hong Kong Police, it was confirmed that this was one of the Bren guns taken from Launch No.1. Turns out in 1953, British troops in Korea was able to recapture the gun on the battlefield, due to the necessity of arms, the gun was kept in theatre and was used by three different regiments before being returned to Hong Kong. The Bren gun was then returned to it's rightful owner and was put on display in the Police Museum.

P.S. The exhibit of the Bren gun claimed that the Launch was attacked by pirates but newspaper reports at the time was very clear that it was a mutiny of two crew members.

I know workplace dating happens everywhere, but I’m curious if law enforcement culture treats it differently because of the nature of the job.

Does anyone have experience medically retiring for mental health under Virginia code section 65.2-107? Without going into great detail, I have reached a point where I am considering filing for medical retirement due to mental health but have some questions about certain qualifying factors under the state law.

Thanks!

When I learned of the allegations I was dumbfounded because it did not appear to be a one off event. The news stated that CHP IA found inconsistencies with about 1/2 of the citations the officer wrote in 2023. I was outraged to learn that the officer received diversion. If there was ever a case for a LEO to serve prison time for their actions, I would think that this would be a slam dunk. How do CHP officers and other LEO's for that matter feel about this?