You guys thought I was finished? Let’s talk about ALPRs, more commonly known as “Flock cameras”. Scanning vehicles, collecting plate info, vehicle details, location, date, and time, and conveniently putting all of that info into one searchable database.
Meaning, they are collecting information on everyone who drives past one, whether you’re suspected of a crime or not.
“But, asbestostoast, they are here to help us!!!”
Well, no.
- They create mass location tracking.
The concern is not that someone can see your car in public. The concern is that government-connected cameras can repeatedly log where vehicles are seen over time, making that information searchable.
- Police have misused these systems.
There are several documented cases of officers using Flock/ALPR systems to track romantic partners, exes, coworkers, family members, and others without a legitimate law-enforcement purpose.
- False alerts can put innocent people in danger.
If a camera misreads a plate, or if outdated information stays in a database, an innocent driver could be treated as if they are driving a stolen or wanted vehicle. This can lead (and has led) to traffic stops, guns drawn, arrest, or worse.
- The data can spread beyond the local community!
Flock systems can be connected through agency-sharing networks. This means data collected in one city or township may be searchable by outside agencies unless local officials actively limit access and audit use.
- The company is not just selling a camera.
Flock operates a larger surveillance platform. Its own terms describe customer data as including: images, video, audio, and metadata captured by Flock hardware. Even if a city technically “owns” its data, residents still deserve to know exactly what the company can access, how it is used, and who else can search it.
- These systems expand over time.
They are usually sold as tools for stolen cars or violent crime, but once the cameras exist, they can be used for broader searches, vague descriptions, immigration-related searches, protest monitoring, abortion-related investigations, school residency checks, and other purposes far beyond the original sales pitch.
- THEY COST REAL TAX MONEY.
These are not FREE. Cities, townships, villages, and counties pay for cameras, subscriptions, renewals, installation, grants, audits, and staff time. Every dollar spent on surveillance is a dollar NOT spent on housing, youth programs, mental-health care, schools, roads, addiction services, violence prevention, or other public needs.
“You already have a cellphone.”
I do not know how to explain choice any further. This is no justification for mass surveillance. People needing a phone to function in modern life does not = police should be able to build a searchable database with public money.
“Oh, so you’re just anti-police.”
This is about oversight, privacy, public money, and abuse of power. Any government tool that tracks innocent people should face serious public scrutiny.
“Well, if you’re not doing anything wrong, why should you care?”
Because innocent people are the ones being scanned the most. I’m not going to consent to the government monitoring ordinary people without probable cause, and you shouldn’t either.
“There’s nothing I can do about it, anyway.”
THAT IS WHERE YOU ARE WRONG, FRIEND!!!
Call your council, show up to meetings, use your voice!
Before any city, township, village, or county agency buys or renews Flock, residents should be asking:
- How many cameras are installed or planned?
- Where are the general coverage areas?
- How much does the system cost per year?
- Who can access the data?
- Which outside agencies can search it?
- Are searches audited by anyone outside the police department?
- How many false alerts have happened?
- How many arrests or prosecutions actually came from the cameras?
- What public vote approved the purchase?
- When does the contract renew?
These decisions should not happen quietly! If officials want to track our every movement, they should have to explain it publicly first.
I included a spreadsheet (updated since my last post) showing where Flock cameras are already installed or under discussion in Mahoning County, along with the meeting dates for each local government.
Find your city, township, or village. Show up. Ask what they approved, what it costs, who can access the data, which outside agencies can search it, and why ordinary people should be tracked just because some people commit crimes.
And PLEASE reach out to me with any questions or if you would like the spreadsheet shared with you!
NO MORE SURVEILLING OUR COMMUNITIES!
Resources:
deflock.org
https://haveibeenflocked.com/
https://www.noalprs.com/
https://www.boardman1984.com/
State Officials PDF
References*:
https://www.flocksafety.com/legal/terms-and-conditions
https://www.flocksafety.com/legal/lpr-policy
https://www.404media.co/city-learns-flock-accessed-cameras-in-childrens-gymnastics-room-as-a-sales-pitch-demo-renews-contract-anyway/
https://ij.org/police-have-reportedly-used-license-plate-readers-to-stalk-romantic-interests-at-least-14-times-in-recent-years/
https://www.wosu.org/politics-government/2026-07-11/ginther-orders-columbus-police-to-stop-statewide-sharing-of-flock-cameras-after-audit-release
https://www.wosu.org/2026-05-01/dayton-suspends-automated-license-plate-readers-after-egregious-data-sharing-violations
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2026-07-14/lapd-police-commission-license-plate-scanner-oversight
https://techcrunch.com/2026/07/13/lapd-lets-contract-with-surveillance-giant-flock-expire-citing-serious-concerns-over-civil-liberties-and-privacy/
https://www.fox6now.com/news/milwaukee-police-flock-camera-misuse-ayala-sentence.amp
https://www.kansas.com/news/politics-government/article291059560.html
https://www.eff.org/pages/automated-license-plate-reader-dataset
https://www.aclu.org/issues/privacy-technology/location-tracking/automatic-license-plate-readers
*I did not include every reference ever for length purposes, but if you need more, lmk.