The reporter tried to get a reaction from Ajit Agarkar about Rohit Sharma and Virat Kohli.

Agarkar didn't say a word.

He just smiled... and honestly, that smile said more than any press conference ever could. 😂

For the last few months, every bad innings came with the same headlines: "Drop Rohit." "Virat is finished." "Selectors have lost it."

But when Rohit answered with a century, there was suddenly a lot less noise.

The funniest part is that Agarkar didn't need to defend his decision. Rohit did it himself—with the bat.

Now, though, the pressure is on Agarkar in a different way. His tenure as chief selector isn't going to last forever, and every selection he makes from here will be judged. If he continues backing experienced players, people will question whether he's delaying the transition. If he moves on from them too early, people will ask why he let proven match-winners go.

That's the reality of being a selector. When players fail, the selectors get blamed. When players succeed, the credit usually goes only to the players.

Whether you're Team Rohit, Team Virat, or neither, one thing is certain: legends don't become ordinary because of a few bad games. And selectors don't become fools because they choose to trust players who've earned that trust over years.

Sometimes the smartest answer isn't given through a microphone.

Sometimes it's just a smile... followed by a hundred from the captain. ❤️🏏

I was thinking about how almost every cricket fan has that one Sachin moment they never forget.

It doesn't have to be his greatest innings or even a century—just the first time you remember watching him live on TV and realizing he was someone special.

Was it the Desert Storm innings? The 2003 World Cup? His historic 200* in ODIs? His farewell Test? Or maybe an even older match that stuck with you?

I'd love to hear how old you were, who you were watching with, and what made that moment unforgettable. Those personal memories are often just as special as the scorecard.