I handed a script to the production team last month. "Busy office, people working, energetic atmosphere." That's what I wrote. That's what came back. It looked like every stock footage clip ever made. And I realized: that's not the production team's fault. That's my writing.
That got me thinking. What if I could visualize my own scripts before handing them off? Not produce the final thing. Just get a rough version of what's in my head.
So I tried it. Took 5 of my old ad scripts, the ones that never got produced, and ran them through AI video tools. The scripts were already broken into scenes with camera directions and timing notes. That's how I write them anyway. Turns out that's basically a video prompt.
I used PixVerse for the video generation. The process was: take a scene description from the script, paste it into the tool, get a 5-second clip back. Repeat for each scene. Stitch in CapCut. Add the voiceover track.
The results were rough. Some scenes looked like a video game from 2010. Some were surprisingly good. The lighting was the most consistent thing. The motion was the most inconsistent. But the overall shape of the ad was there. I could see what worked and what didn't before anyone else saw it.
The problem was pretty obvious once I saw it: Some of my scene descriptions are terrible. I write "a busy office, people working, energetic atmosphere" and expect the production team to figure out what that means. The AI gave me exactly what I asked for: a generic office with generic people. Which means my script was generic. The AI didn't fail me. My writing failed me.
I've started rewriting my scripts with more specific visual direction. It's made me a better writer. Turns out AI video tools are great feedback on your writing. They don't interpret. They don't fill in the gaps. They show you exactly what's on the page. If your script is vague, the result is vague. If your script is specific, the result is specific. It's brutal but useful.