r/camarillo • u/IRISH_BOBCAT • 3d ago
Discussion An Open Letter to Camarillo City Council- ALPRs: A Public Detriment
I have sent this to all council members, but I wanted to share this here for discussion and I will also be submitting a comment at the next council meeting.
There are numerous public concerns regarding increased mass surveillance. The safety and storage of the data that is collected, federal agencies pressuring local law enforcement to access this data, and the constitutionality of using these devices all come into question. What I am struggling to decipher is:
Why are we installing these new cameras?
Are these cameras actually addressing the most urgent needs when it comes to Camarillo residents and their safety?
There is no data, no meaningful study, that suggests that the presence of Flock Cameras decreases crime or makes us more safe.
One of the main points brought up by the Ventura County Sheriff's office during the October 2025 City Council meeting in favor of adding additional ALPRs was the property crime cases along “Theft Corridor" on Ventura Rd. According to the Sheriff's Office, these theft cases by the Camarillo Outlets are largely committed by LA residents who come into the City, steal from the Outlets, and then drive back to LA County. If the solution to this issue is being sold to tax payers as “we can decrease property crimes by spying on our own residents to the point that government agencies and third party data brokers can map out where we live, where we worship, and where we work so that Armani, Coach, and Jimmy Choo can prevent product loss”, I would say that is not a solution at all.
According to the 2025 Crime Statistics report from the Ventura County Sheriff's Office, Ventura County, including Camarillo, actually saw a decrease in property crimes from 2024 to 2025. So I’m not sure justifying adding additional cameras makes a ton of sense when theft, as a whole, is down from last year.
However, what stood out to me from the report was the largest increase in crime, up 23% throughout Ventura County is categorized as “‘crimes against society’, which includes drug offenses, weapons violations and prostitution. These offenses are often generated by proactive enforcement efforts rather than by calls from victims, and represented 35% of all crimes the Sheriff’s Office reported”. (Source: Camarillo Acorn and VCSO website)
So my questions for you all is this: Why are we not focusing our time, effort, and energy on social services to address the spike in crime that is clearly a result of economic hardship and poverty? Why, instead, are we dumping additional tax payer resources into property crime enforcement that does not materially benefit the people who live in Ventura County and instead increases the surveillance state and rates of mass incarceration?
And the unfortunate answer that I’ve come to realize is: “because it’s hard”.
It’s much easier to continue incarcerating individuals for theft, drug use, and crimes related to poverty than it is to build systems that combat poverty itself. It’s much easier to sit in front of your constituents and defend paying $26.5M for Public Safety than it is to defend allocating more money to services that directly benefit struggling residents, but may not have a flashy statistic that’s attached to it. It’s much easier, as elected officials, to pat yourself on the back and label yourself as “tough on crime” than it is to stand up and say no to the people responsible for keeping us safe when they request equipment that can be helpful in solving crimes, but can be detrimental to building community and trust.
Maybe I’m just being paranoid. Maybe I am that guy who now screams about individual liberties needing to be valued while others feel more safe. Maybe I believe that these devices, which can undoubtedly be used for good, can also be used for absolute evil. That surveillance of the public will ultimately be used as a tool of the few to suppress the voices and outcries of the many. No matter what side of the aisle you sit on, the information collected about you by these devices, information that reveals who you are, your habits, your vices, your safe places, your family, all could be used to silence you. To threaten you. To scare you from standing up for what you believe in.
I’m sure when you ask Camarillo residents what issue is most important to them this election season, the majority of answers will be about affordability, healthcare, or housing. I wonder how many will say, “Well, the Nike outlet losing out on shoe sales is troubling”. The City of Camarillo currently spends 3X more on policing than it does on community programming and services, and that isn’t surprising, but it needs to change (Source: Camarillo City Council 2026 Budget Allocations Page 77). That change can start with reviewing the $108,000 Flock purchase approved by council and really analyzing if it was worth it. I hope next October, you view this service request with a bit more pause, a bit more scrutiny, and honestly, a bit more concern for the folks who actually live here.
Thank you for your time this evening