Don't care enough to track down if AI is correct, but this is what it showed.
If accurate then they are indeed legally lying, if he has been pronounced brain dead by two physicians. If only one and they are avoiding / preventing a second opinion, it would still be considered fraud.
Kentucky and DC share the same standard so it makes no difference here, but your assumption that the qualification of what is a dead person has to follow Kentucky is not correct. He has to be declared dead for the 17. amendment to come into effect, and that is a determination made by medical personal where he is, not his home state.
But also afaik there is no evidence he is brain dead (or more than usual) or that he is on life support
48
u/kezow 4h ago
It's not lying if he's not technically dead! Just because a machine is breathing for him doesn't make him any less alive!