I’ve been trying out managing test cases as plain YAML files right inside our Git repos.

The whole point is treating manual tests just like code. Everything is local-first so there’s no web vendor lock-in, and team collaboration happens smoothly by pushing updates to dedicated test branches instead of messing with heavy third-party syncs. Also, since it's all plain text, using Cursor or other AI tools to write, search, and clean up test cases turns out to be super handy.

Anyone else tried keeping QA cases in Git like this?

Hi everyone,

I'm looking for QA Engineer/SDET opportunities and am available to join immediately in India

Experience: \~2 years

Skills: Python, SQL, Playwright, JavaScript, Manual Testing, API Testing, Test Automation, Functional & Regression Testing.

I'm also actively learning AI concepts like LLMs, RAG, Agentic AI, MCP, and AI tools

If your company is hiring or you know of any relevant openings, I'd really appreciate a referral,I will share my resume over DM.

Current Location: Noida,Uttar Pradesh Open to Relocation: Gurugram,Pune,Chennai, Hyderabad, Bengaluru, Chandigarh Reason for change: Lack of learning opportunities in current organisation.

Thanks in advance!

Suggest me any tutorial website or youtube video

Right now I am preparing for the QA job

Release week is when a screenshot queue starts collecting everything at once: a real layout shift, a clipped label, and the usual font rendering noise. The diff job catches all of it, then a reviewer opens a stack of nearly identical images to decide what can actually block the release.

One idea is to send only those noisy regions to SAM 2 and use LingBot-Vision for the boundary features. It would still need a small classifier trained on the team's own screenshots, with the original image next to every result. Sorting obvious rendering noise away from likely layout bugs is enough; the release decision can stay with the reviewer.

Hello everyone,

I am currently seeking opportunities as a Manual QA Engineer with 5+ years of experience in Manual Testing, API Testing (Postman), SQL, Jira, and Agile methodologies.

I am an immediate joiner and open to remote, hybrid, or onsite roles. If your organization is hiring or you know of any relevant openings, I would greatly appreciate your referral or any leads.

Thank you for your support.

Need some genuine advice from people who have worked in CSV or regulated pharma projects.

I've been working as a Computer System Validation (CSV) Analyst for the last 4 years. For the last 6 months, I've also been handling manual testing in my project.

A senior (14 years experience) joined our team. Initially he was brought in mainly for automation, so I gave him KT on the manual testing activities, project flow and documents. That was completely fine.

Now the automation work is no longer happening, so he's been moved to manual testing full-time. The problem is, now he's asking me to teach him CSV and validation concepts as well, and my managers are also asking me to give that KT.

I'm a bit confused about this.

The validation knowledge I have didn't come from formal KT. Nobody sat with me and explained all this. I spent 4 years reading validation documents, understanding regulations, handling deviations and escalations, and learning things the hard way while working on projects.

I don't mind explaining our project, documents, process or how we do things. But teaching years of validation knowledge feels different from normal KT.

Maybe I'm thinking about this the wrong way, so I wanted to ask people who have more experience.

If you've worked in CSV or pharma:

Is this a normal expectation?

Would you share everything, or is there a boundary between project KT and domain expertise?

How would you handle this professionally?

Just looking for honest opinions from experienced people.

For those using AI coding agents for web test automation, which one are you currently preferring: Claude Code or Codex?

I mainly work with Playwright/Cypress and would like to hear from people who have actually used both.

What made you choose one over the other?