I’ve been studying the opening phase of the 1999 Kargil War, and one aspect that really stands out is how brutally asymmetric the terrain was.
Indian troops often had to climb exposed, steep approaches at extreme altitude while enemy positions were already established on dominating heights overlooking key routes.
What makes this especially interesting is that the scale of the intrusion was still becoming clear during the early patrols. So the problem wasn’t simply “capture the heights” — commanders first had to understand how extensive the occupation actually was.
For those who have studied mountain warfare:
How much of India’s initial difficulty in Kargil was caused by the tactical disadvantage of attacking uphill, versus the incomplete intelligence picture during the first weeks?
I recently researched this phase in depth while reconstructing the May 1999 events for a documentary, so I’d also be interested in comparing sources people here recommend.