Hi. In general, these are questions that I found in a place while I was watching posts on socionics, but I thought it was very interesting and unusual and it could also show a way of thinking, some traits and be useful in MBTI too. So that's it. I will be grateful for the answers and help, but I am very curious to know what can be seen in my text. Fortunately, there are so few questions here.
1. A "selfish" person is someone who does not consider other people when making decisions, and instead focuses on their own goals. In what ways are you selfish? Is selfishness a natural human tendency? Is it good or bad? How does a single selfish person affect those around them? How does a group of selfish people affect other people? Are some cultures or systems (think religion, economic, or organizational) more or less likely to be selfish? Is the selfishness in these systems necessary, good, or bad?
I think I actually have a lot of selfish traits that I don't fully realize, they're not at the forefront of my consciousness. I'm generally not known for being good at self-analysis, so I might not fully see a lot in myself, but more and more often I catch myself thinking that my selfishness seems both hidden and quite obvious. I'm more withdrawn, closed off, showing strong traits of a schizoid personality type although I haven't been diagnosed with this disorder, so I have a tendency to retreat into myself and my solitude, into fantasies, prioritizing them over the real world. As you might have guessed not everyone likes this. My loved ones would like me to be closer, more emotionally open, to spend more time with them, but I don't give them that. I share my time, I might want to be with them, but not as often as, say, seven days a week more like two or three of them. Sometimes my closest friend might text me urgently and I want to be alone, so I swipe away her message and continue with my own things, later telling her I was asleep or didn't see it. I think this is my most obvious selfish trait. A former friend left partly for this reason.
I think selfishness is a trait that is initially in the middle for everyone at default settings when we're born. And over time, a person develops it or forgets it, it all depends on the environment and individual experience. I believe it's a natural human tendency that more than fifty percent of people are selfish, people who wouldn't risk themselves or do something for others. Selfishness is useful, otherwise others will tear you apart with their demands, which you if you were not selfish but its opposite an altruist, would be satisfying. Whether this is good or bad depends on how and who looks at it. For me it would be quite inconvenient if the person whose help or resources I need turned out to be selfish enough not to give them to me. But for that person it would be great and useful. Of course, humans are social creatures and we often find ourselves in groups even if forced. And when there are obvious selfish people in a group, it's harder to achieve idealized common goals, to be a team like from posters or cheap advertisements. And if the whole group consists of them I wouldn't say it's bad. Well, there are guys who put their interests above others, so what? Yes, it's not very convenient, but overall it can still work. Perhaps these people can create their own system in which benefits flow to them, in which they are comfortable and well. I'm not the most knowledgeable person in either religion or economics, but I dare say capitalism is quite selfish. Although I like it much more than socialism. Essentially it's like I said, there is a group of conditional egoists into whose hands resources and money flow, a minority. In this system, selfishness is necessary, it's quite tightly woven into its very essence.
2. Science has explained many things in the universe. We can "look" at electrons and manipulate atoms; we can accurately determine the mass of planets and stars; we can deduce historical events which occurred billions of years ago; and we can make accurate predictions of our world and universe. How do you react when people talk about aspects of science in a concrete and unchanging way? How do you react if people suggest that nothing is concrete?
It never seemed to me that science could do everything. I mean it clearly cannot confidently claim something it hasn't approached, hasn't seen, hasn't visited. I've always been surprised that scientists explain something in the universe so categorically that something may or may not be there. Where the hell did you get that from? I'm convinced that we know so little, we still have so much to discover and it's not a fact that humanity will ever be able to learn everything throughout history. So yes, science is very, very abstract much is built on guesses and hypotheses, but you can never assert anything for sure. Nothing is concrete. It's interesting to study, to observe, but we are such tiny grains in the Universe, yet we sit here, so important, fitting the entire Universe and space into our invented laws.
3. Think about someone you don't get along with. Why don't you get along with them? What aspects of their behavior or mannerisms bother you most? Are there many people you don't get along with, or do you get along with most people? Is it easy for you to ascertain this? Are there entire groups of people you do not get along with? Is there a culture or aspect of a culture that you don't get along well with? Why?
My mother. She has overprotected me all my life, suffocated me with it which made me an outcast because she didn't teach me many things, keeping me close to her although I did manage with the acquisition of a phone and entering my teenage years to strongly go against this and argue with her a lot. She is one of the reasons why my peers at school didn't accept me and laughed at me. I never needed protection, mom, I needed you to teach me to see myself, to defend myself. As a result, I have either no will or a strongly hidden one, poor understanding of myself and my personal qualities and desires which has affected my life already in my twenties. She's like a hen, overprotective, fussy, emotional, trying to be peaceful although it's clearly not needed in many situations, but she says it's family, you can't do that even if the person tells you to fuck off and sometimes with strangers she overdoes it and acts arrogantly, in my opinion. Which triggers me. I cannot and do not want to be her ideal daughter, let alone indulge her saccharine sweetness. She considers me rude, heartless. She can often and openly talk about her emotions and feelings, but I don't need that. I never comfortably say that I love someone. I can buy you food, help with writing a diploma, play with you on Discord, but never without grinding my teeth say that I love you. And especially her. She tries to get closer only to criticize your interests, examining them like a critic examining a dish, not listening when you tell her to stop interfering and advising when no one asked and then wondering why you're cold and don't love her.
I don't get along with those who are arrogant, put others below themselves as if they were servants without a voice, who are meticulous and picky, asserting themselves at the expense of others. I can't stand hysterical, histrionic people who demand my attention, drowning out my whisper with their outbursts. Overly sensitive, loud people will throw me off balance. Although I am neutral myself, I can get along with many people although I don't seek communication and making friends myself. Maybe it's childhood trauma or maybe it's just my nature. I can accept a lot if the person is loyal, values me and treats me well. If they are rude and angry with everyone but not with me, that will also be pleasant. So yes, you can be Tate Langdon or Albert Wesker, but I'll be there if you're okay with me, accepting, understanding, non-judgmental and would choose me among all people one hundred percent. Nevertheless I don't get along with adherents of stereotypes, mass hysteria, who don't think, don't want, don't change their minds, evolving and developing, but remain at what they were told. Homophobes, sexists, racists these are the groups of people I would clearly not want to be in the same room with. I know this might be a bit categorical that such people may have positive traits, potential for change, however, it's easier not to play with an alligator hoping it won't bite off your hand than to hope and come close? Exaggerated, but that's how it is. It will also be difficult to interact with ardent patriots who don't want to turn around and be a little more objective. It's important to be able to see and hear, not to go blindly.
4. What is a friend to you? What is a good person? Can a person be good but perform bad actions? Is there a model for frequency of bad actions for a person to become bad, and is intent involved? Do friendships have inherent obligations and expectations? What obligations and expectations exist within friendships? Are there levels of friendships? How are other people's interpretations of friendships different from your own? What are the flaws in yours or others, or do flaws necessarily exist?
A friend is a loyal and devoted person who will stand up for you and with you anywhere, who will always choose you and not judge, accept you as you are, understand. A good person is a vague concept, but it's someone who has positive characteristics, not harming others. The most important thing is not to intentionally harm others.
Yes, I think a good person can commit bad actions, just as a bad person can commit good ones. This adds or subtracts pluses to the karma, conditionally, but it doesn't make a person different. You can, under pressure of circumstances, not of your own free will, by mistake, do a bad thing. There are many options. I deeply believe that intention is key in a person's action. I want to understand it, analyze it, then talk about how bad it is. I can accept a lot if I understand. I don't think there are clear criteria for a bad person, there are always nuances. Even the law seems to me not to take into account many factors.
Each friendship has its own criteria, I won't speak for everyone directly. As I said above for me acceptance and loyalty are important in friendship, respect although this is not the ultimate truth. Honestly, I don't know how my understanding could fundamentally differ from someone else's, a survey would be needed here. I believe there is no clear division into flaws and pluses of my or anyone else's understanding, it's already very subjective, so I won't speak about it.