[r/procircparents](r/procircparents)

I’ve reported it, if you guys could too. There are graphic photos and videos in this reddit along with sexually suggestive comments, captions, and roleplay. Basically a pedo sub disguised as a parenting sub

Alors voilà, je suis sur r/circumcisions et r/circumcision, et lorsque je vois une demande du style "Devrais-je me faire circoncire ?" J'écris en DM pourquoi il ne faut pas le faire. Si c'est pour une raison médicale, et que la personne ne sait pas qu'il existe d'autres traitements, je lui donne les liens et ressources appropriés pour son cas en lui expliquant pourquoi c'est mieux et plus léger comme traitement. Au moins 8 personnes ont évité ça à travers mes différents comptes au fil du temps, mais je me sens stupide de faire ça, qu'en pensez-vous ?

Trouvé sur r/circumcisions C'EST UN ESPACE FÉTICHISTE

As in, if let's say a mother wants her son cut, but the dad doesn't want him cut, would a hospital need both parents signatures or would the decision be fully up to her? Also vice versa- if the dad wanted his son cut but the mother didn't, could the father get it done without her consent?

Edit: Y'all I'm talking from a legal perspective. Also I am anti-circ already.

Hi Everyone I am new to this group but have been against circumcision for nearly 14 years. A little background story, I am a mother of 3 boys. My oldest is almost 17 my middle son is almost 14 and my little guy is 6. With my oldest I didnt really know any better, Im American and my Husband was circumcised and so I guess I let him him make that decision. At the time I had never really been exposed to the argument on the other side. However when he was only like 2 weeks old and we were actually having the procedure done, looking my my intuition was screaming at me. But I also had that same highly fight or flight reaction everytime he got shots. Which as most of you know the American childhood vaccine schedule is the most aggressive in all of the world. When my oldest was a baby he also had reactions to all his shots which I didnt even realize were reactions. I just thought he was maybe born with something wrong with him and/or was a baby that cried a lot. He definitely displayed a strange nervous system though and had a lot of sensory issues. But he was always way ahead of his milestones, early walker and talker so I didnt make the connection. Then when he was 2 he ended up getting whooping cough in spite of 4 doses of dtap. Thats when I started researching, I was like "wtf these shots dont even work and I put my baby through that pain over and over" so basically i started being exposed to a little info about the downsides of circumcision here and there. And during this time I got pregnant with my second son. I had won my husband over about not vaccinating him as a baby (perhaps not ever) but he was very firm about circumcision. I wasnt exactly equiped with enough info about it at the time cuz the vaccine stuff consumed me. But I personally had a enough info and intuitive experience to be against. Still I let him make that call. It ended up being a bad situation because his healing process was awful, i resented my husband for it. I felt like "you gave our baby this wound and here I am the one primarily responsible for nursing it" for various reasons not only the circ stuff, him and I ended divorced. I remarried my current Hubs and him and I had a my youngest together. My Hubs is what I call partially circumcised, meaning his parents had the procedure done but they didnt really take much skin at all. When hes soft he looks totally intact. So one thing I discovered is sex was really great with him. He had way more sensitivity but could last long too. Sex was gentle and nice. Him and I researched together and both decided to keep our youngest intact. We learned how to care for an intact baby penis, to never retract, etc. And my son as been totally fine. About a year or so ago Waylon (youngest) ended up getting a mild issue. He was complaining about his peepee hurting/itching and when I inspected it, it was a little red around the tip. It was summer time and we were swimming a lot, playing outside and I admit I wasnt super on it as far as hygiene. He wasnt disgusting or anything but probably got so.e bacteria just from having dirty hands and holding it to pee. He was 5 at the time so, checks out. I just had him shower and then I made a coconut oil with 2 drops of tea tree mix and put the salve on it for the next 3 days or so. And it healed, he had no other symptoms. Flash forward to today, my son woke up in the middle of the night complaining his peepee hurts. It was kinda red around the tip so I cleaned it and put coconut oil on it. No tea tree this time cuz I currently dont have any on hand. My concern is he also developed a fever overnight and is complaining of body aches and hes pretty fatigued. Almost flu like but without the coughing, runny nose, etc. I asked him if it hurt when he goes pee, and he said no. He also got stung by a bee yesterday in the pool on the back of his head. Hes never had a bee reaction but hes never had the stinger and venom sack get really in there like yesterday. But the sting area itself isnt inflamed or anything. I am mildly allergic tho and my mother is severely. So Ive always been cautious about it. So my question is should I take him in? Im not really someone to medicate, or give antibiotics cuz I hate the damage it causes to gut health. But obviously I will if it is serious enough. Also being in America, doctors are pro circumcision so Im always weary of taking him in and them saying he needs a heavy dose of antibiotics and an emergency circumcision. Idk I havent had to deal with this situation so Im just kinda thinking worst case, ya know. Anyway if you guys could give me advice, I'd be so grateful. So far ive just done the coconut oil and I gave him like 250mg of ibuprofen to help his body aches. Tho I may not do that again cuz I know that suppressing a fever is counterproductive. My kids often get low grade fevers for a day or 2 and never develop any other symptoms especially during flu season. I always just let the fever do its job. Its possible that the fever is unrelated to the redness on his peepee. But perhaps not, I feel like im stuck between a rock and a hard place here. Please advise, thanks everyone.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12984066/

March 2026
Balanitis xerotica obliterans (BXO) is a chronic, progressive, inflammatory, and sclerosing disease of the male genitalia. If left untreated, it can lead to urinary and sexual dysfunction and reduced quality of life.
We describe a 15-year-old Caucasian male with a 3-month history of progressive thickening and whitening of the prepuce and penile glans. He reported mild pruritus, embarrassment of the prepuce retraction, painful cracking of the foreskin, and painful erection. Dermatological examination showed mild erythema and hypopigmentation of the foreskin and penile glans, a sclerotic white ring, and erosions at the distal portion of the prepuce.
Based on history and clinical findings, a final diagnosis of balanitis xerotica obliterans was made.
Topical treatment with miconazole nitrate/hydrocotison 20mg/10mg/g cream (Daktacort) - once a day for 3 months and topical tacrolimus 0.03% ointment (Protopic) - once a day for 3 months, twice daily for 9 months, and once a day for 4 months was applied, resulting in gradual and full improvement of the subjective and objective manifestations of the disease.
No side effects were observed. No recurrence was observed after a one-year follow-up.
Our findings are consistent with published data and further support the recommendation for topical tacrolimus as a therapeutic option for BXO.

This is the one dreaded disease of the foreskin that medical consensus insists cannot be cured without circumcision, if the foreskin is non-retractile and there is a visible ring of scar tissue.

https://www.cuh.nhs.uk/patient-information/balanitis-xerotica-obliterans-bxo-in-boys-information-for-parents-and-carers/

What is the treatment for BXO?
Circumcision is required to treat BXO. Circumcision is the surgical removal of the foreskin.

https://londoncircumcisioncentre.co.uk/conditions/bxo/

Treatment in children: Once BXO has caused scarring and a persistently tight, non-retractile foreskin, circumcision is commonly recommended because conservative measures are often less effective when fibrosis is established.

Turns out BXO can be treated with just topical treatment, even BXO that features a sclerotic (scarred) ring of tissue at the tip of the foreskin, as this case shows.

The treatment can take many months but does not add significant discomfort to that which is already present, and it gradually offers relief from all the symptoms of inflammation/balanitis until total resolution.

The inexorable march of progress?

Well, sort of...

Tacrolimus was discovered in 1987, it was approved for medical use in America in 1994 and in Europe in 2002, while the article mentions BXO was first treated with topical tacrolimus in 2003. You can't help but feel things could have gone a little faster than this.

Saw this post so thought I should share here to help her out!

These people are really ignorant.

I think a lot of people are confused as to why Dr. Freedman would in breath claim "Circumcision is an unnecessary procedure" but then in the next breath say "And here's how you perform it so you can too". So I'm going to attempt to say why his position makes sense (not that I agree with it)

1. His belief is that circumcision is medically unnecessary and shouldn't be done if it doesn't need to be

2. Circumcision is not illegal and still a cultural practice in the USA

3. Parents will still want their son circumcised regardless of this anyway

4. If parents will still want their sons circumcised, then it is in the best interest of the medical community to know how to perform safely

5. Otherwise more boys will be hurt by this procedure or parents will go to less than reputable places to have it done anyway.

6. Freedman may be against the practice himself, but is not opposed to people getting it done anyway. He's still a "parental rights" guy.

with the 6 points above it points to a pretty clear picture of where the guy is at mentally with his position. In theory he wouldn't get it done for his own kids, and would probably tell a parent not to get it done, but if a parent was adamant and still wanted it done anyway, he'd rather the doctor know how to do it than to fuck up the boy's penis before he's even a day old.

It's still not a great position to hold and quite frankly we should lose the knowledge of how to do it (well not entirely, but not every doctor should be learning about it should be an active practice you have to learn into rather than something everyone is taught). Nonetheless, I think his position makes sense even if I don't find it agreeable and it's better to have someone who's against it like this than to have someone who is for it entirely and does think it is necessary, which Freedman doesn't.

The video is no longer viewable on Youtube.

Download it here.

this kind of stuff needs to be talked about!

for me, I never had a conversation about infant circumcision with him. He did bring up the cutting of females in Africa though during a discussion we once had. He was appalled by that. Yeah, I know, he presented me with the perfect opportunity to confront him about my RIC. I don't know why I didn't because even at the time I was kind of awake about the damage it did to me. This was in 2013 or 2014. I know him fairly well and I'd say he just has stronger feelings towards the mistreatment of women as opposed to men.

Ultimately the reason why I feel he was fine with me being cut at 1 day old is his stance that, well it was done to me so you get it too, sort of thing. Not so that my penis would match his, but that I deserved the same treatment in life that he received. Not even that he would resent me being whole and him not. Possibly he would ahve been jealous of me. He didn't have a pleasant childhood. His stepfather was fairly abusive towards him. I think it is comparable along the lines of being the same as people who were abused as children grow up to be abusers themselves, in a lot of cases. He had a very good filter for BS and I think he knew for sure that it damaged him as a person and he wasn't about to let me escape the fate that befell him. Maybe like some sort of demented cosmic justice for him? IDK?

Do most redditors censor their own posts and comments? Some subs the comments are all mostly uninhibited. Or is it just extreme ignorance?

Take for instance this recent post at the sex subreddit.

What’s stopping men from being vocal in bed? https://www.reddit.com/r/sex/comments/1uxiwy3/whats_stopping_men_from_being_vocal_in_bed/

as of now, 90 comments and not a single one of the comments suggests that maybe circumcision is the cause. There were a couple of men who say that they don't feel enough sensation to make any sort of vocalizations and just leave it at that.

and then there are many comments saying that they do make a lot of noise during sex. I wonder if these are all just the intact men?

These are a series of YouTube videos -- talking about circumcision, from a "more medically aimed perspective". Videos answers the question: why circumcision has these hypothetical medical health benefits, from a more microscopic perspective. Not really based on a statistical perspective. Circumcision pseudoscience + amputation science.

--Video -- Part 1: Circumcision -- more medically aimed perspective

https://youtu.be/CicMV82l0X4?si=i_ixKycQBaTIHsLK

--Video -- Part 2: Circumcision -- more medically aimed perspective

https://youtu.be/qjhwv0ju3wk?si=pCO4escGhBoLO9nA

--Video -- Part 3: Circumcision -- more medically aimed perspective

https://youtu.be/edapm2Db58s?si=gdYOHu9V1iIimv9B

Whenever I'm discussing infant circumcision with a non-in-the-loop person, especially a circumcised man, one of the retort's I hear is "Well, when I got my ADULT circumcision I was FINE".

As much as I doubt that, no shit. An adult circumcision or even teen circumcision is far, FAR less worse then an infant and that's a fact.

Yes, all circumcision's are bad. Yes, they are remove the band which is literally like 25-50% of your total sensation since it is directly connected to the foreskin via the nervous system. HOWEVER, The adult circumcision doesn't usually remove the fren or even inner skin as much as an infant cut. You have to realise that not only do adult's get to CHOOSE how they are cut, but they also get to say when they are cut. They get the consenst argument and then USE IT AGAINST US, BULLSHIT!

Infant cut's are basically a castration and I refuse to believe otherwise. That's why people who say they are "fine" with circumcision ARE SUCH FUCKING LIAR'S. YOU got cut an age AFTER PUBERTY, AFTER A TRUE DEVELOPMENT WITH YOUR FORESKIN YOU PIECE OF SHIT. I don't want this to turn into another rant but holy hell these people are so fucking evil! I DIDN'T GET A CHOICE AND I LOST OVER 90% OF MY FUCKING SENSATION BECAUSE OF IT! WHAT THE FUCK!!!!

So YES, does anyone else get annoyed when this happens? I DO. CLEARLY. It's so frustrating seeing them try and gaslight me and say I can "enjoy my sex life" still. Do you know how much that pisses me and other cut men? (IN MY CI-LEVEL, NOT ABOVE IT) It does, a lot. And when people say stuff like "I was cut as an adult and I'm fine" it only adds to that statement. It only adds to the fire, not tamper it.

I don't have to try seeking love or romance or sex or orgasm's anything that intact people do. I say that with a heart full of coal. But it's the truth. I'm free from that. I'm free from anything sexual...including myself.

My parent's always asked if I was going to get married or whatever. Find a relationship, who are you attracted to type question's. I never gave 'em clear answer. I'm glad I didn't. I don't have to anymore, mom and dad. I don't need to do that. They even go so far as to ask the inevitable question, the one I hate. "Will you have kid's, StopMGMToday?".

There are 8 billion of us, I can happily die alone in the "worst" case scenario. I don't need anyone else but myself. There's a term for that, something that isn't philosophical. Regardless of whatever it is, I feel like it applies to me. I can't stand intact people anymore. I don't like them anymore. I don't like talking to them online. I block them any chance I get. Their evil creature's, seemingly. Born in a perfect body, and yet, still complain about circumcision to me. Their actual demon's.

Occasionally, I get told I'm "trolling" or "overexaggerating" my problem's. That I'm some big pussy fucking baby dumbass. Whatever string of word's they use, you know? Well, let me say this. Would I really be trolling for over 150 post's? Really now? Do you think that the lack of my foreskin is a minor issue to me still? Do you think my pain is fake, artifical? Do you think my problem's are a mental issue, somehow, someway? Are you still going to suggest therapy and restoration like a scumbag POS NPC? Cause that is exactly what every single one of them say's. Programmed to say. Basic response.

I'm free from myself. I don't have to try anymore. I give up. I have given up. What am I saying? Just another rant, don't mind it.

There's a trend I've noticed on these place's, a growing one. Beside's the rightful negativity, I've noticed that anytime criticism come's across Restoration, Intactivisim, or even circumcision (yes, really.) It's the same comeback. A barrage of insult's and very rude attempt's to shut you down. Similar to a certain groupthink of a polictical party. Except it doesn't work when we have lost our functioning penis, not on me at least.

Whenever I vent, or say a bold statement like "I can't enjoy sex or masterbuation", (Which is RIGHT for me, that's the truth!) I get told I'm "wallowing in my own suffering" and constantly pushed down. Imagine pushing a victim down of a SEXUAL CRIME. PERFORMED BY "DOCTORS" FOR THE EXPLICIT PURPOSE OF REDUCING SEXUAL FUNCTION. That's what their doing. And I don't know if you have noticed, but, I DON'T LIKE CIRCUMCISION. I CAN'T GET BACK MY FORESKIN, PERIOD. That ENOUGH, is to be mad all the time and be a angsty teenanger about it. BE MAD, GET MAD. WE ARE MISSING A CRUCIAL PART OF OUR PENIS! YOUR PARENT'S LET YOU GET RAPED TO NEVER ENJOY SEXUAL FUNCTION NORMALLY! ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME!!!!!!!!

I'm so tired of people telling me it's "all going to be okay" once I restore or whatever the fuck. I can't restore, that's what these people just don't get. It's either that or me being an incel or whatever other buzzword they think of. Just proves my point, these people don't fucking care about circumcision and child ritual's. That pisses me off. And I know that's not everybody but it feels like a hijacking especially in these circles. I can't tell you just how many time's I've seen bodyshaming, mockery, joking, about us. The cut men. HERE, IN PLACES FOR VICTIM'S OF A FEDERAL GLOBAL SEXUAL ASSUALT. WE GET BODYSHAMED AND LAUGHED AT FOR SOMETHING WE DIDN'T DO. Fuck you! Fuck you! FUCK YOU!

And that's not even talking about INTACT MEN TELLING ME I'LL BE OKAY. DON'T GET ME STARTED ON THAT. I've ranted about that so many times, and rightfully so. From now on, I will be blocking any intact man that tries to converse with me in a negative connation or mockery. Fuck off with that. Along with the toxic positivity. People say being a "doomer" is bad. Well hey, maybe thing's really ARE that bad WHEN WE ARE MISSING OUR FUCKING FORESKIN! THE WHOLE POINT WAS TO PROVE THAT! IT WAS TO PROVE HOW IMPORTANT THE FORESKIN WAS!

Everywhere I see, I see the same type of responses. "No it wasn't!" "You're just overexaggerting!" "Stop being a baby!"

Why is that a controversial statement?

For one, circumcision DID ruin my life. My life is over, I can say that with certainty. My dick is dead, my brain is fucked, and my body is scarred for life. People say therapy and mental medication and WHATEVER THE FUCK can help. Bullshit. BULLSHIT! There has been multiple posts, such as myself and others, where our lives, YES, LIVES NOT SEXUAL LIVES OR ANYTHING JUST LIFE IN GENERAL, has been HEAVILY reduced by circumcision. I CAN'T WALK, IT HURT'S TO WALK. IT HURTS TO PEE, IT HURTS TO MOVE. FUCK YOU if you say otherwise. I know what I am experiencing is real and factual. Stop saying it isn't. Most men who are on my level can testify that our pain is VERY REAL. Most men here can't say that what I have stated happens to them. GOOD FOR YOU, but this is a real reason why people like us say our lives are ruined by circumcision. They literally are, verbatim. That was the point of it!

And to add on that, the amount of misinformation about circumcison (which is purposeful and intended) hurts everyone involved. For men, it obviously skews the truth and makes them think it's "fine" or "okay" to be circumcised. It's not, and never will be. You're not living what nature intended. You were harmed, purposefully by pedophile's. That's the fucking truth. And for women, they think that circumcision is just how it is. Of course, once they taste intact they never go back. They then start bodyshaming us, ENDLESS BODYSHAMING. Just another reason for why I believe our live's are ruined from this.

There are more reason's but like I said, I spiral. I begin to say thing's haphazardly that may not even be wrong, but still. I can't write much longer. Please understand something. Please understand that million's of men are cut not by choice. Please understand that our sex lives or even masterbuation lives are destroyed or heavily reduced. Please understand that every fucking day we hate ourselves more then you can ever imagine. Please understand that quite literally nothing compares to circumcision in any regard, seriously.

Please understand that.

PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT. AND STOP FUCKING INSULTING US.

For a moment, take a deep breath, and feel for a moment, that You are on the right path, Your mindset is correct, and Your work, no matter how small, does make an impact. It does.

I know, I have been seeing a lot of men on Internet who always say 'My convincing is not working' or 'Intactivism is not spreading well' and to them, yes, maybe they don't see the progress today, the 1% fall in every two years in USA, and disproportionate fall such as West Coast being more intact than Mid-West.

Or the overall religious communities of the world, where the rates are barely falling.

Reddit banning Intactivists from other subreddits or entire Reddit, its also occurs.

The things I wanna tell you why Intactivism will win one day, are pretty simple.

-> Its a natural desire to keep a foreskin - Any part of the body, not just genitals, any part of the body, which atleast you can see or feel, doesn't want a conscious removal from a person, be it a newborn, or be it a normal person ( excluding the brainwashed-fetishes ).

Our Body knows it serves a purpose unconsciously. You don't remove ears to prevent cleaning them. You don't remove nose. You don't remove your Lips or teeths to prevent cleaning them.

Its a very simple philosophy, that Foreskin is not a mutation, birth defect, deformity, or a congenital issue. Infact not having one is a defect actually. It has evolved for Millions if not Billions of years. Millions of years of Human Evolution involved the Foreskin into the Male Genitals.

People need to start questioning the practice that has been practiced less than 5500 years ago is better than an artistic outcome of Millions of Years of Human Evolution? As if the foreskin was wrong in the first place? Really?

As if, someone from 5000 years ago, has more idea about sensitivity of foreskin and its functions than millions of years of Human Evolution that stands us here, Close to perfection of the human body.

Nature sides with us.

-> There will be a large fall in Circumcision - Most parents today are influenced by their previous generations to still continue it, they get pressured from their parents who were brainwashed by their parents and so on,

which at the end of the day, someone brainwashed them or fooled them into including circumcision in their culture, and back in those days, it was pretty rare to got to know that there still exist a large number of intact cultures in the world, which actually stand in a majority. 75% of the world is intact.

They never go through the rite of passage, they never go through this so called 'cleanliness ritual' ( surprising that it was done because bathing was not a regular thing in those places ) , and now since internet is very much affordable and has connected the world.

They are realizing, that for most of the boys around the world, they grow up normally without it.Just because you don't see them here or don't see them on any intactivist related spaces doesn't mean they don't hold a disgust or negative opinion over it.

After a certain era, there will be a large fall in circumcision globally, i.e. 15-30 years from now, thats still 2040 to 2055, but by that time, the fall will be immense due to the loss of pressure from older generations and the new set of information coming from the internet. Because most people today do circumcision because everyone's doing it without questioning and getting informed well.

The new gen ( especially the culture who are familiar with penises on internet ) will realise intact is the natural form, and circumcised is the mutilated one. This point will also strongly drive Intactivism imo.

Intactivists who were criticized today will be called the Pioneers, they will shape the Men's Rights globally. Yet, as a fellow intactivist, we have not yet finished, our job is yet to remain, and these are the measures to how increase intactivism effectively -

1) Flood the internet - With intactivist opinions backed by actual scientific studies

2) Open Youtube Channels - Start opening channels that promote Intactivism, sounds weird, but its more easy to convince people with both image and words than with just words.

3) Donate ( if you can ) - Donate to Intact Global, Foregen, Bloodstained men and other organisations that are fighting for Intactivism. Its not obligatory, but its recommended.

4) Join as much Intactivist circles as possible - Be it Reddit, Discord, Youtube, circumcised.com anywhere, because once your presence increase multi-platform, the movement looks bigger, much bigger.

5) Involve friends (and other close people of your life) who agree with you to intactivism - Its not always important or obligatory to do the same, but try showing them the approved studies such as the Denmark one on STDs etc and how the African studies and a lot of circumcision promoting studies are biased actually, Try to Convince them especially if they are on the fence or follow cutting but don't have any reason.

I think, convincing can be done the best if they are going to have a baby ( regardless of boy and girl, because thats the phase where most people start thinking of this practice ), so yes, usually Baby Phases of a parent is what compels them to controversies on circumcision, and is a more favourable situation for convincing people compared to any general situations of life ( imo tho ).

6) Do not link Intactivism with being religiously targetted - We are just meant to promote a complete/intact genitals of any child, not meant to harm or hate people on religious grounds through this movement, but criticizing the religion's idea of circumcision is allowed obv.

7) Do not unjoin this movement please ( humble request ) - You may feel disheartened, you may feel like no progress is happening, its okay, take rest, enjoy nature, refrain from Intactivism for few days, and then return with a clearer mind, and with small actions at first.

This is what I wanna say, we will win, Intactivism is bound to win, 1.4 billion men being genitally mutilated and yet people defend it atm. We will not let these Cutters win at any cost. #ForeskinWins

P.S. - There are some people who demand justice, or demand reparations for their loss, they are not wrong tbh, but, Justice by suing parents doesn't really work all the time, you will be called like a weird person who is wasting resources, and with the presence of Pro-circumcision studies, placing your points hard onto the floor will be hard, you gotta be influential or famous guy to fight for it at first, being just a common man, Justice is hard, and thats when you can hire a private lawyer or a person with more expertise in these cases and you can present the facts of those studies which are against cutting or say cutting doesn't affect anything tbh, thats when suing does still make sense.

But yk, there are 200+ million FGM suffering people, and they are not getting the justice appropriately all the time, like money reparations, how so a 1.4 billion ppl get reparations, a common man's justice is usually protests on grounds at first. We can get Justice to people, but that'll take even more manpower now, and only an extremely frightening study (about circumcision) can only make a change quickly, even if it does occur, it'll be hard for the government to fulfill reparations to all of them in the near future ( but in the far future, maybe reparations can be done by money etc, and later harsh punishments can be done for a forced circumcision, but thats far from now, like 80+ years maybe )

Thank You for Reading

Circumcision, especially as an infant, is a purposeful enslavement of a man. The purpose was to stop the man from having masterbuation and potentially sex due to a lack of sensation. The foreskin play's a vital part in both of those sexual function's, period. Everybody knows this by now.

But what you might not know is that, in my opinion, it is ALSO a rite of passage. For the corrupt elite's and billionaires who wish to profit off of this and gain entry into the elitehood of the world, it is vital that they are circumcised. This show's their true colors, so to speak. It shows who they are alligned with, and why. Them also profiting off of the facial cream produced by circumcision is the cherry on top. They get to enjoy the rape of babies and also directly gain money, power, and fame off of it. While for the average infant american their life is ruined, for the average elite adult who chooses this path, he not only get's to choose when and how the circumcision is done, but also where on the globe he want's it done.

The truth is, circumcision is both a rite of passage and multiation. Two thing's can be true at once, I'm sure we have all heard that saying. And yes, circumcision is still happening, RIGHT NOW. So this isn't "fading" away as some people would say it is. It's still an important part of the puzzle. A key piece to why the elite's won't fall. And why circumcision happen's in the first place. It's like state enforced cuckoldry protected by "laws" and "order". But we know the truth, don't we?