I've been doing a LOT of thinking the past few days...
What exactly is the foreskin? It's nothing more than the active mobile component of the penis' shaft. It's not its own entity and certainly isn't deserving of its own title. The penis is made of two primary sections: the glans and the shaft. There is no such thing as a foreskin. It's just part of the shaft. Foreskin IS the shaft. It's all once part. One seamless piece. Does the way I am explaining this make sense?
Let me back up... Firstly, it's not just "skin". It's specialized mobile shaft tissue essential for not only protecting the glans from the outside world, but increasing sexual sensation for the male (aiding sexual intercourse and impregnation). The entire idea of a foreskin and the word itself is a psychological operation with intent to make us believe it is its own thing when in reality its just the mobile section of the shaft. Even the word foreskin itself significantly reduces the impact of this section of the penis by reducing it to nothing more than rudimentary skin which it is NOT. It is NOT just "skin". When a male is "circumcised", they aren't removing the "foreskin", they are simply flaying his shaft. The language we are continuing to use is all by design to keep us losing this war and its working to our enemies' benefit.
There is no dotted line showing where to mutilate, and no two "circumcisions" are the same which further adds merit to my claim. However in theory you can remove the glans and shaft in their entirety and it would look the same across every person done to, but no two "circumcisions" look the same or are the same. Every male genital mutilation is unique in its appearance, function, sensitivity loss, etc.
The psyop doesn't end with the concept of a foreskin either. The entire narrative and dialogue around this critical issue has been crafted strategically by those that desire to exploit our suffering and cause us immense harm. We need to dramatically change the way we approach this issue. We need to hit the hard reset button and start from literal scratch because we are operating under the information, dialogue, and language provided to us by the enemy. We need to wake the fuck up.
Foreskin is not real. Circumcision is not a real medical procedure and never will be under any circumstance. For the clowns that want to claim phimosis or cancer or whatever else bullshit you regurgitate like the good cattle you are as an instance of it being required, we can agree that the mutilation of the penis' shaft may serve as a fix for these issues, but that does NOT make it a medical procedure. You're literally just being flayed. It's as simple as that.
The idea of consent being the primary concern with MGM is so fucking wildly wrong and such a shit position to attack from. In a scenario in which I was left unmutilated, I would have never, I repeat, NEVER voluntarily opted to have my penis mutilated. No, our issue is not consent. The issue is removing the ability for someone to reach their full human potential. The issue is someone wanting to control my sexuality. The issue is someone profiting from my suffering. Because I am mutilated, I can, by definition, never reach my full potential. I'm not trying to spread nihilism, but its the fucking truth. We delude ourselves with copes like restoration and foregen and dumb little court "wins" and fancy "research" but its all just bullshit. All of it. We operate under our enemy's rules and it needs to end. Thats how we win.
To summarize, all of us en masse need to shift our argument so drastically if we are to see any change in our lifetime. Nothing is working and it's because we are abiding by the rules, language, and narrative that has been set forth by the mutilators themselves. It's fucking bananas that I seem to be the ONLY person who has this deep understanding of this issue. Everything we are collectively doing is just blatantly wrong and laughably ineffective.
We need to reject the following:
- The word and notion of a "foreskin"
- The words and idea of being "circumcised" and "uncircumcised"
- The idea of "circumcision" being a medical procedure plus the word itself
- The word and concept of being "intact" (aka being NORMAL) + rejecting the terms "intactivism" and "intactivist" (but not the idea)
- Foreskin restoration/regeneration (I didn't tackle this issue in this post but both those words are shit descriptors and don't actually reflect what this process entails)
- The idea that consent is the issue
- The idea that we aren't entitled to real justice
We need to reject EVERYTHING our enemies have fed us.
We need to embrace being loud, relentless, and cut throat. For fuck sakes our penises were mutilated and here we are using the language of our enemies, infighting, and tone policing our own community. It's wild and it keeps me up at night. The enemies are winning and its because we abide by THEIR rules, THEIR language, and THEIR narrative.
Why?
P.S. Yes I'm fully aware that my forum circumcised.com is in direct conflict with what I've outlined in this post and it makes me look like a hypocrite. Firstly, I've come to these ideas rather recently months after the forum was created, and secondly, while I would love to operate under an alternative name that better aligns with my goals, either none are currently available or their owners are asking for $25K+ so I went with what I thought was best at the time and what I thought could enter the cultural zeitgeist the fastest. I'm planning on renaming the forum and doing a major overhaul when I've saved enough money to do so.
In the meantime, it's the best I could muster.