I find a lot of people talk about the "Anything that exists without my knowledge exists without my consent". But I've always found the monologue at the end by Holden to be more interesting.
Also please forgive me, I don't have the book handy and had to type it from audiobook, so I have punctuation and might miss a few words.
This is an orchestration of an event, for a dance in fact. The participants will be apprised of their roles at the proper time. For now it is enough that they have arrived. As the dance is the thing with which we are concerned that contains complete within itself its own arraignment and history and finale. There is no necessity that the dancers contain these things within themselves as well. In any event the history of all is not the history of each, nor indeed the sum of those histories. And none here can finally comprehend the reason for his presence, for he has no way of knowing even in what the event consists. In fact, were he to know, he might well upset himself. And you can see that that cannot be any part of the plan, if plan there may be
An event, a ceremony, the orchestration there of. The overture carries certain marks of decisviness. It includes the slaying of a large bear. The evenings progress will not appear strange or unusual, even to those who question the rightness of events soforth.
To me, it speaks to how Judge Holden can be evil, and be right. It's stuck with me for a while. It almost feels like an expansion to the phrase "All the world's a stage, and all the men and woman merely players"
What other passages or parts do you feel like don't get enough attention?