Show your SaaS in 3 Words

I will start - FindYourSaaS(dot)com - SaaS Directory

Just a warning for anyone looking at Appkittie (app intelligence / ASO tool), because they're really good at telling you they're the best on the market, but the way they get people to pay is borderline dirty.

I started a 3-day trial for their $97/month plan, which unlocks all the features (I have the screenshot). So I go to try the screenshot generator. It says: "this is a premium feature." Since I can tell the app is vibe-coded, I figure they just left that there and that I'm premium anyway (since I'm on a premium trial). I click ok. BOOM, charged.

NO CONFIRMATION, NOTHING. Since I went through Link/Stripe, my payment details were already loaded and there you go…

I disputed within 20 minutes with Link, they didn't want to hear it. In their refusal email, Stripe literally apologizes "for the fact that your subscription was charged directly without you receiving any notification about the payment" — and refuses the refund in that same email, saying I'd been "duly informed." So thanks, they wash their hands of it and tell me to go see my bank. And ZERO email from AppKittie. They don't exist (go look).

I tried a chargeback. My bank's card provider (Swan) only handles fraud, not commercial disputes. So there you have it, I paid $97 for 3 generated screenshots…

While I'm at it: exactly like all their competitors, their app MRR estimates are wrong (I have apps on the App Store, and I know my own apps' MRR — trust me, I WISH the numbers shown on Appkittie were the real ones!)

I just went back to their site and it looks like they've removed the trial… For now.

I really think it's a shame to have to go as far as making a Reddit post, but it's "thanks to" (because of?) Reddit that I wanted to try Appkittie in the first place. So… maybe they'll read this? Anyway, watch out.

Making FeedbackQueue.dev, a free-to-usefeedback-for-feedback platform for founders to get feedback and testers without commenting, posting, DMing, SEO, ads, or doing any marketing bs. you won't even try to find them

WELL, we reached 1,000 users in less than 4 months, haha (selling at this point 😄)

oh yeh, and in case you need testers but no time to give it, there's credit for that

welcome aboard, folks.

I’ve built plenty of SAAS projects and have noticed this pattern:

1. Coming up with ideas is pretty easy
   
2. Building the project is relatively simple
   
3. Marketing your MVP is terribly hard, especially with a budget of $0.

I create all my marketing videos myself and it takes hours to crank out just a 30 second high quality product. I post and these get views, but not even traction on my SAAS. Is there a specific niche/idea I need to use, and are there any specific marketing tactics that work the best for you? I don’t know what I’m doing wrong and I’m putting all my effort into trying to sell my product. Any tips or personal anecdotes would be greatly appreciated 🥹

There are so many threads like this in various subs across the "saas-space" (if you will) where we all post our products endlessly without much engagement. Anyone actually see a result from any?

I launched eigen.so beta here on reddit and received great feedbacks on the idea and product. Reworked on the feedbacks and releasing the stable build to the public soon.

I updated the landing site but receiving mixed comments on the site.

Could you visit and suggest what can be improved? Does the site give a clear idea of the product? I’m happy to receive harsh feedback and help you get the most out of it in return.

Cheers!

Hi everyone,

Give the same prompt to Grok, Claude, GPT, and Gemini when you're building a new app or feature, and you'll get very different features, copy, UX, branding, and visuals. That variety is genuinely useful — but with most AI builders like Lovable, you can't easily switch models and compare, so you're locked into one direction from the start.

So I built MultiPrototype.ai. You can generate 2–10 versions of a website, app, or feature — each from a different AI model — and see them side by side on a canvas. Compare them, edit them, then export the code to Codex, Claude Code, or whatever you use.

Here's an example: a social media analytics dashboard built by Claude, GPT, Grok, and Gemini:

https://multiprototype.ai/share/project/P84w6P4yfRDc2VVzvG4fAzZUK4i_QFKd/canvas

A few details:

• Around 20 models to choose from
• Model names are hidden by default so you stay unbiased — reveal them when you're ready
• A leaderboard ranking models by user votes (coming soon)

I believe that starting from 2–10 quality perspectives instead of one gets you to a better product, faster.

Free accounts get 6 generations. Would love any feedback.

Thank you.

Hey everyone,

Trying to figure out early traction and noticing that advice changes like crazy depending on what you're actually building. What works for a dev tool obviously won't work for an HR platform.

If you’ve already crossed that first milestone, how did you actually pull it off?

Curious to know:

What niche are you in?

What was the exact channel that actually brought in your first users? (Cold email, Reddit, Product Hunt, etc.)

Would love to hear some real stories.

Thanks in advance!

I've been using a home-made link shortener for my private clients for over 10 years. After millions of clicks, it occurred to me that others might use it, too, if it was easy to use.

If you’re drowning in long, messy links full of tracking junk, wb.io can be a super clean fix. To get the ball rolling, I'm offering Redditors a month of the Business level service for free with the coupon code REDDIT. All I ask in return is your honest appraisal of where it could be improved.

It turns bulky URLs into short, shareable links that actually look good in posts and comments. Way easier to drop into Reddit threads, DMs, bios, or anywhere character count and readability matter. No wall of random parameters, no visual clutter — just a tight link that people are more likely to click.

Biggest value prop IMO:

Cleaner posts (especially on Reddit where ugly links stand out)

Easier sharing across platforms

Device-specific forwarding: send Apple users one way, Android a different way, everybody else a third way

More professional look

Simple + fast, no overcomplicated dashboard vibes

If you share links often, it’s one of those small tools that just makes everything smoother.

I built a tool that takes an idea and gets you to the point where you can actually start building.

What comes out:

• Deep-dive market analysis: market sizing, competitors, consumer psychology, academic evidence, pricing, financial model, GTM, risk scenarios. Every figure has a source link.
• PRD + feature specs: what to build, why, in what order.
• .cursorrules + CLAUDE.md drop into Cursor or Claude Code and start on the MVP.

The goal is connecting idea to MVP fast, with documents that hold up. An agent for after you launch is in the works too - tracks actuals against the plan, hands you tasks, asks for proof. (Not shipped yet).

What makes it different: Most validation tools spit out "your idea scores 73/100," but whoever built it picked those weights and you can't check them. So I dropped scores entirely. The model writes the prose, it doesn't invent the numbers - every figure gets pulled from a source and locked before the writeup. You make the call.

To get one, comment with all five:

1. What the idea is (specific beats a one-liner)
2. Who it's for
3. Top 2-3 core features
4. How it makes money (subscription, one-time, freemium, commission, ads - or whatever you're considering)
5. Market or region

Only running the ones with all five - thin input, thin report.

You'll get read-only links to the PRD and the deep analysis. The feature specs and build files aren't something I can hand over in a comment - those you get by running it yourself, and there's a free tier for that.

It's my own tool. Running it only on my own ideas doesn't show me what's missing

Over the last few weeks, we noticed a pattern that made us rethink documentation.

Users rarely browse documentation anymore.

They don't open categories or navigate through menus.

Instead, they type questions exactly like they would ask a teammate.

"How do I integrate Slack?"

"Why isn't GitHub Sync working?"

"Where do I configure webhooks?"

The interesting part?

Almost every answer already existed somewhere in the documentation.

People weren't struggling because the documentation was missing. They were struggling because finding the right page took more effort than asking a question.

So instead of improving search again, we tried something different.

We built an AI Chat Agent that reads the documentation and answers questions in plain English. Every response is grounded in the published docs, so users don't have to jump between multiple pages looking for an answer.

Something unexpected happened after launching it.

The conversations themselves became more valuable than the answers.

We started seeing:

• The questions users ask most often.
• Documentation that people couldn't easily discover.
• Topics that needed better explanations.
• Features that created confusion during onboarding.

In other words, the AI assistant became a feedback loop for improving the documentation itself.

If you're curious, here's the project:
AI Chat Agent

Are you still relying on traditional documentation search, or have you experimented with an AI Chat Agent for knowledge retrieval?

I had this idea to create a free veteran benefits site that shows veterans every benefit they're eligible for based on a few non invasive questions.

I went ahead and created a foundational site, it caught a ton of traction and hit 180,000 active users in the first month of launching and now I've turned this project into a new goal of becoming a one stop shop for all veterans, we've now created a mapping feature that in its final stage will show veterans every business in their area that offers military discounts within a 35 mile radius.

Its been a great experience so far that has helped a ton of veterans!

I built tryproduck.com/audit so you can get that without waiting on me. you paste a url in and it goes through your site like a first-time visitor, then sends back everything that's off.

last one had "Error loading tasks" shipped as sample content inside the mockup on the landing page.

hai everyone i'm new here nice to meet you all

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8huctFqexM

We started building SemantiCAD AI 3 weeks ago and we developed a lot. If you know people who uses CAD and deal with DWG/STEP/DXF to get BOM and Production Plan, I would like to talk <3

Just wanted to say thank you to everyone who has starred, tested, contributed, or shared Klaat Code.

We recently crossed 200 GitHub stars, which is a huge milestone for an open-source project.

Alongside the release, we also published our benchmark comparing Klaat Code with other CLI coding agents using the same prompts, the same verification commands, and the same evaluation harness.

Some results:

* Klaat Code: 33/33 tasks solved — $0.89

* Claude Code: 33/33 — $4.83

* Composer 2.5: 33/33 — ~$1.54

* opencode: 31/33 — ~$1.47

Everything is open source, including the benchmark, so anyone can inspect the methodology, reproduce the results, or benchmark another agent.

If you’re interested in AI coding agents, we’d love your feedback—or even better, contributions.

GitHub: github.com/klaatai/klaatcode

Thanks again to everyone who’s helped us reach this milestone. 🚀

I’ve been in contact with a lot of web agencies and web developers, and I personally haven’t found many people who run their agency in a more efficient way than I do. A lot of them have too many meetings, wait too long for client approval, don’t know how to price projects, and spend way too much time on each client instead of finishing the work and moving on to the next one.

I’ve been running my agency for four years, and after a lot of trial and error, I’ve managed to make the process as efficient as possible. I wanted to share some of the steps because I think they could be valuable for anyone just starting out.

Running a web agency alone or with a partner isn’t easy because there are a lot of things to take care of. When it comes to client acquisition, I recommend focusing on either cold calling or email automation. Which one you choose depends on whether you run the agency alone or with someone else.

If you have a partner, one person can handle sales while the other focuses on building websites, connecting domains, setting up emails, and taking care of the technical work. If you’re running the agency alone, or neither of you enjoys cold calling, I highly recommend email automation.

That’s what I’ve been doing for years. It’s powerful because you can send emails at scale, set up automatic follow ups, and wait for businesses interested in a new website to reply. While you’re working on one client, another opportunity can come in without you having to stop everything and search manually.

I don’t do regular email automation where I target businesses with no website. I do the opposite and target businesses that already have one.

I use a tool called Swokei to find businesses with websites, add them to campaigns, analyze each site, score it, and generate personalized outreach emails based on problems it finds with the design, layout, speed, SEO, and mobile optimization.I schedule the campaign, set up follow ups, and wait. 

I think this approach is much better for a few reasons. You’re targeting someone who already understands the value of having a website. You’re also not just asking whether they need a redesign. You’re pointing out real problems with their current site, which makes it clear that you actually took the time to look at it. Selling also becomes easier because they’ve already paid for a website before and understand the process.

Inside Swokei, you can choose the goal of the campaign. You can offer a free draft, try to book a meeting, or simply start a conversation. I always choose the free draft because that has worked best for me.

Once you’ve figured out how to get clients, the next part is building the website. I recommend using AI because it makes the process much faster. For anyone who still thinks AI can’t build great websites, I think they’re mistaken. You can use Claude, Base44, Lovable, or any other tool that works for you.

When someone replies interested, I call them and say, “Hey, I saw that you replied to my email. I’ve already built you a free draft of your website. Do you want to take a look?”

Then I invite them to a Google Meet.

At that point, it becomes much harder for them to reject the meeting because they already replied interested and now know you’ve built something for them. During the meeting, I present the website, explain why it’s better than their current one, stack the value, answer their questions, and try to close the deal.

These meetings usually go well because the client isn’t trying to imagine what the website might look like. They can already see a better version of their current site. They also took the time to join the meeting, so taking the next step becomes much easier.

I either take payment during the meeting or send them a contract to sign. Any changes and updates come after that, once we already have a deal in place.

Pricing depends on the business. I charge anywhere from $500 to $3,000 depending on the company, the size of the project, and how much value the website can bring them. I also charge a monthly retainer of around $50 for hosting, maintenance, support, SEO, and future changes.

That’s basically the entire process. Smaller steps, faster delivery, less wasted time, and more money made.

Hi All,

I'm on the building journey of an app that will monitor and renew certs automatically on a variety of platforms, would love any feedback :)

https://orange-ops.com/