A lot of the book editions I own are older (40+ years old) and those editions are often not on Goodreads. To get these editions added, I have frequently had help from a specific librarian I have a relationship with, so I don't have to wait for half a year while my request languishes in the queue. However I'm trying to be more conscious of his time, so I'm going through the traditional route via the Librarians group right now to get some things added.
One thing I'm noticing is that telling the librarians that the info I'm providing comes from my own copy of the book – that I own – is not enough. And since these are old editions that are often not listed on Amazon or other book webstores, they're asking me to upload pictures of publication pages and other bits of "proof" to get the edition added.
Librarians have even seemed skeptical about using my own scans that I've taken of book covers when I wanted to upload a clearer photo (a lot of older covers on Goodreads are blurry, heavily pixelized or tiny). Even if a cover is clearly and literally the exact same as an existing one, just in a larger/clearer version, they demand photos of the publication page which must match the existing edition info. If the existing edition's info is incomplete, and therefore there is not match, they tell me they will not replace the photo, and I have to put in a request to add a whole new edition for it, which of course takes months.
These are not things I experienced with the librarian I work with. Is the above process normal? Is Goodreads really this stringent and byzantine with their cataloguing processes? I wish it were easier to become a librarian myself so I could just add whatever missing editions/photos I come across when logging my collection, and not have to bother other people, but alas...