​

Who tf gave the right to parents to kick their kids or harm em physically or even scare em ???and in return the kid should just shut tf up and take the hit

What even is this life about? It looks like the parents choose to give life to a new person in this world so they will make em suffer

Is this okay tho? I never saw a person who's mentally right by this shi fk raising ups . U teach ur kids to respect grown up ppl

We have spent so much time and energy into tackling the hard problem of consciousness, but the answer was right in front of us all along.

When the thought came to me, I shit my pants.

Basically language is geographically restricted, which means someone who can't speak my language cannot receive my thougt. Furthermore even between languages, normally one language imposes rules that are unique to its own on the philosophy of another language which doesn't share those rules. In consequence, a thinking that is conducted in one language is now distorted by another. What it reveals is not to incentivize the debate that which language is more superior for philosophy than another, rather, language as a whole is a barrier for philosophy. Thinking enjoys its free rein in its own right. Language is deteriorating this right of thinking. Thereby I propose silence as the way of communication for philosophy. The Chinese wisdom has shown that chee is the fundamental energy which permeates our bodies, and it serves as the constituent for the field of telepathy. The highest form of philosophy is indeed this very field itself. We should all embrace our chee in silence and enjoy the jubilation of philosophy.

There's no up, there's no down, no left, no right, no front, no back, no before, no after in the non-physical world. These are just the illusions of the physicality of the world, that consciousness has to learn "growing up" because it is not innate ideas it has. But the body has these notions of up, down, front, back, left, right, before, after. It even has a notion of inside and outside, which the spirit doesnt have and that I think is the fifth dimension after time: identity. Every thing has 3 spatial dimensions, and one temporal which intersects with the 3 spatial dimensions to create 1) translation (up/down), 2) rotation (left/right) and 3) scaling (front/back), combined equals movement. But on top the these dimensions there's one identitical dimension (out/in), which intersects with the spatial dimensions to create 1) a formal dimension (form/matter) with the intersection of up/down spatial dimension. 2) the internal dimension (surface or superficial/interior or depth) with the front/back 3) the wrong/right or right/wrong dimension (depending of which, left or right, side is considered the wrong one). That identical dimension also intersects with the temporal dimension which creates the existential dimension (alive or existent/dead or non-existent). And the only thing linking all of these dimensions are the points at the intersection of each axes, points which are part of the non-physical world and composes the physical world. And the points are all the same, there's only different information at each of these points concerning their value in each of the dimensions. And information is non-physical. It is simply that the same information defines the same physical thing, but the information is not the physical thing. Take any point, and tell me how it is different from any other point. You'll say how everything is different, but the point itself. That point that is the same everywhere, everywhen, that is God.

Religion seems to have little impact on outcomes? Why so?

​

So I was thinking, asking why like my master told me to. I think I have came to the conclusion that I am on the cusp of absurdist nihilistic existentialism along my beliefs of Christianity.

I don't know why theists keep struggling with this. Atheism is literally just a lack of belief. That's it. It isn't the belief that God doesn't exist, it isn't a worldview, it isn't naturalism, and it certainly isn't materialism. If you ask me to defend any of those things, you've fundamentally misunderstood what atheism is. I don't need to explain consciousness, morality, logic, reason, the origin of the universe, or literally anything else because I'm not making a claim. I'm simply unconvinced by yours. The burden of proof remains entirely on the person asserting God exists. Asking me what I positively believe is just an attempt to shift the burden of proof because you know your arguments don't work. Every single discussion somehow ends with theists trying to redefine atheism into a positive belief so they can pretend we've made a claim, and then when we reject that definition they start quoting dictionaries or philosophers as if those override how atheists actually use the term today. It's honestly incredible how many mental gymnastics people will perform just to avoid accepting that "I'm not convinced" is a complete position. There is no hidden worldview, no secret doctrine, no atheist catechism. It's just a lack of belief. If you still don't understand that after it's been explained a thousand times, I'm starting to think the confusion is intentional. You are all dishonest.

EDIT: This is my LARP as a internet atheist, please don't take this seriously. I am intentionally trying to be as insane as I can be lol. The atheists who are actually vibing along and agree with my full blown insanity are pretty hilarious, and are just bad at philosophy.

Like, take anything, and realize that if it were any worse, it couldn't still exist, and therefore we can conclude that everything is as bad as it could be.

For example, take the iPhone. It is a pretty decent phone. But if it were any more expensive, not enough people would be buying them and Apple wouldn't be producing them.

Another example, public transportation like busses. If busses were any more a pain in the ass to take, people would find other means of transportation and not enough people would take the bus for it to be a profitable business and busses wouldn't exist.

You can literally apply this to anything!

Therefore, I conclude that we are in hell.

Humans suck. Furthermore, I'd argue all living beings kinda do. Logic and reason are methods not end goals. Most of the stuff people use reason and logic to argue against or for no matter how innocent they seem, come from their internal emotional biases. You will quite literally be labeled as a mentally ill person if you genuinely try to come up with universal ethics and values that don't come at the cost of someone or something.

This is flared hormones and shit because a particular phase of my hormonal cycle has been happening for over 2 weeks.

Imagine you, being a foil, in the middle of the time. What is behind you as the past is only articulated in your coming-to-be from your 'is'. In other words, what you believe is present is only a past, yet which is to be articulated in present or considering your vicissitudes in time in future or coming-to-be. Your philosophy is really a striving to be what you were. So much so that you never die but only dying because death is a "past" you can never comprehend. Philosophy is always outdated but up-to-date. This is my philosophy. A philosophy of consciousness looking towards which the time turns its back to.

I’ve been watching a lot of existentialist tiktoks and I’ve decided that I’m cut out for this philosophy stuff. I already know all the important philosophers like based Zizek, based Kierkegaard, based Marcus Aurelius and based Nietzsche etc. I really like writing about Deleuze because I feel like it gives me license to invent my own terminology and then I don’t really have to think too hard. What jobs are there in philosophy that pay at least six figures and DON’T involve publishing or teaching smelly college freshman? Thx :)

P.S. I have #13 on top posts all time on
r/Deleuze . Would that help me

Like I didn't even consent to being born...

I’m still undecided on whether the MMW album is incel jazz or not.

Out there, there are tons of cool chemical reactions, like elephant toothpaste or fireworks sparks. Your life, thoughts, and your actions are just an excruciatingly slow and tedious chemical reaction. Wouldn't it be cool if humans, the moment they were born, reacted rapidly with oxygen and turned into beautiful, colorful sparks? That would save a whole lot of time.

For us and whatever feels stupid and right for us too . Also wtf why ppl pick jobs anyways? Is it to give service to someone and in return u will get money ?? How ppl even help perfectly w that. This can't work out . Why u even help ppl like if it's not for money whatcha gonna do ? Also do I choose my job to show up or act like om the perfect human being who help ppl wtf is that I crave to be a loser and do things which makes me happy . Everyone can do that too why we have to help each other that way ? . What life is even about if not just to live and be happy? Everything else is nonsense . Yall weird

All men have the X chromosome which is the sexual DNA of women. So all men have the sexual DNA of women and we can expect all men to feel attraction towards men and be obsessed with dcks. Therefore, having the XY chromosomes, we can expect all men to have their X chromosome express in their behavior as well. All men are also sexually women. And all men are therefore also gay indeed.

From what I can tell reading the Gospels, all the pieces of the puzzle fall into place when we read them from the perspective of closeted gay men.

1) Why did Judas kiss Jesus affectionately? The text explicitly says the kiss had a fervour to it. If Judas was only greeting him as men would do back then, the text would've said "Judas greeted Jesus" and not "Judas kissed Jesus with affection".

2) Why was there a naked man at Jesus's arrest? What were they doing in the woods, a campment full of men? This enigmatic passage from Mark makes super sense if you consider they were having a gay orgy at the campment when the soldier made their descent. The man fled naked because he didn't want to be caught there doing gay stuff.

3) Why did the Father get Jesus killed? He got Moses to die before entering the promised land due to some fault he committed. Such is the same for Jesus. The Father had Jesus killed because he was gay.

4) "Fishers of men" has a double entendre. When Jesus says he'll turn his apostles into fishers of men, there are two things at play, the reference to Jeremiah I think where he says God is like a fisher. But there is also the seduction metaphor of fishing.

5) Why did the apostles leave their wives and children at home to go follow Jesus "at the mere sight" of him? That's how physical attraction works!

6) Why did the crowd turn against Jesus little after welcoming him warmly at Palm Sunday? Why did they prefer to release Barabbas, a murderer, over Jesus, a healer? Homophobia is the reason!!

7) Why did the apostle deny ever have been tied to Jesus? Because his secret was out and they didn't want to come out of the closet them as well.

8) Why was the secret doctrine only for the men following Jesus and not the women? Because it's all about being gay! Sure, women didn't study under a rabbi, but Jesus wasn't at all like any other rabbis! Or else, he wouldn't have ushered in a new religion.

9) Why are so many priests gay? Because they follow in Jesus's footsteps. They don't want to marry women, so they marry Jesus.

10) Why was Jesus not married by the age of 33? Because he's gay.

11) Why are the apostles jealous of Mary Magdalena in an apocryphic Gospel? They behave exactly like jealous lovers!! I believe this text was apocryphic because it wasn't gay enough and Jesus was too bisexual in it. In the canonical Gospels, Jesus rejects the advances of Mary Magdalena (when she washes his feet with her hair). She's there to tell us he's not interested in women.

12) Why does the Gospel of John explicitly says that Jesus was in love with one of his apostles? If it was platonic love, it wouldn't have said that like this because Jesus loved all his apostles platonicly. There was one he was particularly in love with. My hypothesis is they all had gay sex, but Jesus fell in love with one of them.

13) God represents itself in the Other! There's an explicit passage in the prophets about how God loves the Other. The Jews were the other of the Egyptians, their slaves, and God chose them. Moses was the other in Pharaoh's family, and God chose him! Ishmael was the other in the family of Abraham, the bastard son, and God chose him to become the father of Muslims. Joseph was the other amongst his brothers who sold him to slavery, and God chose him for the highest timeline amongst them! Jesus was also an other from within the Judean community. He was LGBT.

The Gospels makes much more sense when you consider it from the angle of closeted homosexuality. As Thomas S Kuhn would say, sometimes the value of a belief is in how much it can explain. Even though we can never have proof of gay behavior or sexual orientation, maybe it's a belief worth adopting to make sense of the story, but also to unify the world into a God that is for us and for them. Maybe it'll be a better world is we made Jesus come out of the closet.