r/YouShouldKnow Mar 13 '26

Education YSK 3-4% of the world died in WWII

Why YSK: Understanding the scale of total destruction a major world war can have will help understand how modern wars can affect us.

~ 2.3 billion people existed in the world before

WWII and about 70-85 million people died during the war that statistic of deaths was over the period of 6 years and let me show you why it's so insane.

If it was 70-85 million people who died it's roughly 35,000-39,000 people a day and 1,600 people a hour. These are people just like me and you by the way the reason I decided to post this was to bring attention to the fact. We usually see news but I know most of us will disregard it or take it by a grain of salt because we aren't in the conflict, or it hasn't affected us at all but it's important we are extremely aware that at any moment and given time the ongoing wars our government gets involved in can impact us.

10.6k Upvotes

269 comments sorted by

4.1k

u/sticky_spiderweb Mar 13 '26

This would equate to between 240,000,000 and 320,000,000 today.

2.9k

u/kamekaze1024 Mar 13 '26

So basically the entire population of the US dying over 6 years. That’s fucking nuts.

2.3k

u/rosemachinist Mar 13 '26

RemindMe! 6 Years

947

u/hippopotapistachio Mar 13 '26

Jesus Christ lmao 

131

u/JelmerMcGee Mar 13 '26

It started at least when Russia invaded Ukraine. Not when America started bombing somewhere in the middle east again

80

u/Bird-in-a-suit Mar 13 '26

Irrelevant. Don’t act like this is normal

147

u/FluteGunner Mar 13 '26

The sad thing is, it basically is normal.

The US has been bombing the Middle East almost without stop since the 80s.

56

u/choke_my_chocobo Mar 14 '26

Born too early to fight in the Middle East

Born too late to fight in the Middle East

Born just in time to fight in the Middle East

1

u/muffinass Mar 15 '26

It's a tradition I've grown up with.

30

u/NietszcheIsDead08 Mar 13 '26

I mean, “normal” just means within expected parameters. “Russia is being imperialistic and land-grabby” and “the United States is bombing the Middle East” are actually very normal, horrible things. Reality is often horrible.

That doesn’t make them acceptable or desirable things. But normal, very much yes.

7

u/Bird-in-a-suit Mar 13 '26

I’m just trying to maintain that push against it. I think we underestimate the impact thinking of something as the usual, even if we abhor it, has on our willingness to address it. Reality isn’t horrible, these aren’t storms we’re mad at, but decisions by people who should held accountable. What’s horrible is this situation.

64

u/JelmerMcGee Mar 13 '26

? What? I was merely commenting on the fact that it didn't just start now. It's currently escalating and, just like previous world wars, countries are using it as an excuse to wage more war.

-57

u/Bird-in-a-suit Mar 13 '26

Sure, I can believe that. The phrasing of it made it sound like america and isreals war should be downplayed. Whether you meant it that way or not, wanted to counter propaganda

23

u/PlentyOMangos Mar 13 '26

How do you think of all this stuff when you’re just a bird in a suit? Shouldn’t you be eating seeds in an office somewhere?

6

u/Supreme_Mediocrity Mar 14 '26

When people talk about World War II actually starting in China, they aren't downplaying the Nazis...

→ More replies (1)

5

u/PaulTheMerc Mar 13 '26

historically? Seems pretty normal. not good, but normal.

5

u/Bird-in-a-suit Mar 13 '26

Yeah, of course. I’m just tired of the apathy. Tired of the deflections and normalization of it

2

u/rootkode Mar 14 '26

US GOOD RUSSIA BAD?

1

u/Crow_eggs Mar 13 '26

"We didn't burn him!"

1

u/Rivetmuncher Mar 13 '26

Time to bring up the Marco Polo Bridge for abaolutely no reason?

0

u/cecilmeyer Mar 14 '26

You mean the war we started in Ukraine correct ? with us pushing for them to be in NATO which Russia warned time and time again that they would not accept NATO on its border.

Would America accept Russian or Chinese bases on the US Canadian or Mexican border?

4

u/Snoo63 Mar 15 '26

Didn't Russia illegally invade and annex Crimea in 2014?

0

u/cecilmeyer Mar 16 '26

After Ukraine kept attacking it you mean? Also it is one of Russia's biggest naval bases.

1

u/Snoo63 Mar 16 '26

You meaning the war in Donbas?

0

u/cecilmeyer Mar 16 '26

That one too.

1

u/not2dragon Mar 17 '26

I'm pretty sure Russia still have free will, unless they're secretly a US puppet.
Also if that hypothetical war happened, the US would be culpable for starting it.

1

u/Infinite_jest_0 Mar 17 '26

No you didn't push them to be in NATO. You told them that this may be a possibility some time in the future, not now, without providing any reasonable path to actually achieve it. If you wanted them to be in NATO, they would be in NATO. Instead you just nudged Russia to act now before it's too late.

This was not an issue with being too much of a world policeman, but too little. You didn't want Poland to be in NATO either. Remember? We needed to blackmail our way in.

1

u/redditor_286 Mar 14 '26

That guy would be required in a few days tbh

7

u/regoapps Mar 13 '26

With those odds, there's a 1 out of 28 chance you might not be around to see the reminder...

4

u/f1ve-Star Mar 13 '26

WW!!! Can do better. Bet we top 5%

1

u/H_I_McDunnough Mar 13 '26

I'm doing my part!

30

u/Intelligent-Guard267 Mar 13 '26

Lol - who says it will take 6 years?

RemindMe! 6 Months

10

u/f1ve-Star Mar 13 '26

Well, it's already been at war for 6 days, RemindMe! 6 weeks

1

u/Catac0 Mar 14 '26

Eh, a lot can happen in 6 days. RemindMe! 6 days

1

u/f1ve-Star Apr 24 '26

Shit it's been 6 weeks and only gotten to be more of a cluster f.

5

u/kamekaze1024 Mar 13 '26

Really naive to think US civilians are gone be the main casualties in any conflict we cause

3

u/choke_my_chocobo Mar 14 '26

Russia had 26.6 million

Germany had 8.3 million

Japan had 1.8 million

US had 416,000

1

u/mw4365 Mar 15 '26

2-3 years strikes me as the peak. Trump/Elites gotta do whatever they can to ensure there are no further elections, perhaps even if that means the potential end of most of society

Probably a good lesson for the next civilization to not let people who are going to die in the next decade have all the power in the world. I wouldn’t give a fuck if I was staring at death either!

2

u/ddawg4169 Mar 14 '26

RemindMe! 6 years

1

u/PlutoJones42 Mar 14 '26

RemindMe! 6 Years

1

u/Goetia- Mar 14 '26

You'd be so lucky.

0

u/jackbray200 Mar 15 '26

RemindMe! 6 years

10

u/[deleted] Mar 13 '26

Yeah but this world war would be different. Billions will die, world war can’t happen.

17

u/xrelaht Mar 13 '26

40% of the deaths in ww2 were military. 90% of the deaths in the next one will be civilians, many of them by disease or starvation in uninvolved countries.

21

u/musiclover818 Mar 13 '26

Dying is a passive statement. It's murder. Genocide. Take your pick.

6

u/CCV21 Mar 13 '26

Some areas were more affected than others.

10

u/PassivelyInvisible Mar 13 '26

From a Western perspective, a lot of that gets hidden if it happens on the Eastern/Pacific front, especially when it comes to civilians, because those don't appear in history books that focus on a few major battles. A lot of Eastern Europe got drafted into one side or the other and used as cannon fodder, or got all their food stolen and left to starve. Same goes for China and the Pacific.

4

u/xrelaht Mar 13 '26

27M in the USSR, 20M in China. That’s half right there.

5

u/PassivelyInvisible Mar 14 '26

And almost all of them were civilians who were just born in the wrong place.

3

u/xrelaht Mar 14 '26

The siege of Leningrad killed a million civilians, mostly by starvation.

3

u/PassivelyInvisible Mar 14 '26

Which is the city + metropolitan area of Tucson, Honolulu or Omaha just gone

30

u/kamekaze1024 Mar 13 '26

I know, I’m just putting it into perspective.

1

u/A_wandering_rider Mar 13 '26

Looks at the Soviets and China, yep.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 13 '26

That's a lot of fertilizer.

2

u/unf0rgottn Mar 13 '26

I got curious from your comment. The population in 1940 was 132m. That would've had devastating effects for sure.

1

u/tonkatoyelroy Mar 14 '26

That’s their plan

1

u/ForAHamburgerToday Mar 14 '26

RemindMe! 6 months

1

u/AgitatedStranger9698 Mar 14 '26

Thats the plan..

0

u/sugaglow Mar 16 '26

One can only dream

-17

u/itsmike7 Mar 13 '26

American here. I think it’s better for everyone if we’re just taken out — you’ve got my permission 🥰

→ More replies (7)

33

u/nowhereman86 Mar 13 '26

So the entire population of the USA

-5

u/IsaacsIssac Mar 13 '26

Yall would be better off without us.

o7

4

u/PirateSanta_1 Mar 13 '26

It would probably be worse today even proportionally. We are more reliant on international trade routes and electricity now plus weapons have longer ranges and greater payloads.

1

u/round-earth-theory Mar 13 '26

They aren't necessarily better at killing a lot of people though. WWII might have been simpler, but they dropped a fuck ton of bombs. Carpet bombing was incredibly disastrous and completely indiscriminant. We wouldn't be able to output the same amount of destruction with these new smart bombs as they're way too expensive.

2

u/xrelaht Mar 13 '26

We have nukes. Even decades past Cold War I, we have thousands of them, enough to destroy every major city on the planet.

4

u/cridersab Mar 13 '26

This would equate to between 240,000,000 and 320,000,000 today.

If we assumed the current global crude death rate of about 0.77% (the USA is higher) at about 8.3 billion people you're looking at over 380 million to 400 million dead if you accounted for population growth without a world war over 6 years now. Is the WW2 figure the excess percentage or total?

294

u/UserNameNotHereSCAC Mar 13 '26

They don't call it the biggest conflict in human history for nothing. The scale of WWII is crazy. Hopefully nothing like it will ever happen again.

88

u/DignityDWD Mar 13 '26

Hopefully...

Man, there shouldn't be a "Hopefully". It should be our duty to ensure it doesn't happen. There should be responsibility. Accountability. We're here now because we let it happen

5

u/KingHenry13th Mar 14 '26

Who enforces it?

8

u/justaprettyface Mar 15 '26

The UN was made to do this. It worked alright until Russia and the US decided to bring absolute fucktards into the mix

2

u/KingHenry13th Mar 15 '26

So does it work? 

→ More replies (2)

2

u/Zealousideal-Bell-68 Mar 15 '26

Although in relative terms, it's only the 9th deadliest war if I recall correctly. The 30 years war was quite worse in that regard

1.3k

u/tankinthewild Mar 13 '26

About 1 in every 5 Poles died during the war. I recommend checking out the book Bloodlands by Timothy Snyder if anyone is interested in the region in general during this time period.

217

u/BiscuitDance Mar 13 '26

Estimates put about 25% of Belarusians dying during the war.

221

u/unfaircrab2026 Mar 13 '26

Summary: don’t be in Ukraine or Poland from 1930-45

89

u/He2oinMegazord Mar 13 '26

Thanks, ill try to remember that

13

u/loveengineer Mar 13 '26

Found the time traveler, guys!

43

u/PipsqueakPilot Mar 13 '26

"Ya know your neighbor that spent the last two centuries building their nation's ethos around being really really good at war? Yeaaah- they've decided they want to kill your entire ethnic group. Best of luck."

5

u/Apprehensive_Lie_177 Mar 14 '26

Sorry, I wanted a domination victory this match. 

5

u/hypnodrew Mar 13 '26

Don't be in Ukraine from 1930-

260

u/Bituulzman Mar 13 '26

The global Jewish population is only just now reaching the numbers that it was estimated to be prior to WWII.

It’s hard to wrap your head around raw numbers and OP’s percentages and stats like yours really help to put it in perspective.

72

u/hypnodrew Mar 13 '26

Irrelevant, but made me think of the wild as fuck fact that Ireland's population is still lower than it was before an Gorta Mór (Potato Famine if you're nasty) and the subsequent migration. That was 1845-52 btw.

-19

u/Lazy_Toe_5305 Mar 14 '26

Semi relevant why are people in Ireland so anti semetic? Genuine question 

39

u/Swagcopter0126 Mar 14 '26

If you mean why does Ireland tend to support Palestine it’s because they see a resemblance in their own struggle against a colonial power.

Don’t confuse anti-Zionism with antisemitism.

-26

u/Lazy_Toe_5305 Mar 14 '26

No, I meant what I asked. But when you reply like that it does kinda come off as overt anti semitism

13

u/crackedup1979 Mar 14 '26

Go to bed Hasbara...

3

u/hypnodrew Mar 14 '26

Not a genuine question if it's built on a faulty premise, like "why do you kill people?" I can't answer that question because I don't agree with the premise.

2

u/Marinah Mar 14 '26

Damn you got a source for that or are you just a weird freak

-5

u/spucci Mar 13 '26

Can't let the Poles just have their moment eh?

84

u/Bituulzman Mar 13 '26 edited Mar 13 '26

Their “moment”? WTF?

Added for context: half of those WWII deaths in Poland were Polish-Jewish people

-43

u/spucci Mar 13 '26

And again.

36

u/shreebalicious Mar 13 '26

The only person making it a contest here is you. Gross.

→ More replies (7)

18

u/gonzo0815 Mar 13 '26

There are adding to the comment, not taking something away.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

20

u/wanderingrockdesigns Mar 13 '26

Tim Snyder is excellent. It became apparent how serious of a situation the US has gotten itself in when the history professors that teach about authoritarianism left the country. I watched his Yale Courses on YouTube about the history of Ukraine 4 years ago and have learned so much about what makes a country.

8

u/DynamicHunter Mar 13 '26

Now show the number for military aged men. Recently in Ukraine and Russia that demographic’s life expectancy and death rates have skyrocketed. That leaves a huge missing generation

31

u/Hazzawoof Mar 13 '26

My grandparents were orphaned in WWII. Both of them only survived with one sibling each. Between them they lost 4 parents and 9 siblings.

Obligatory FUCK RUSSIA (they were in Eastern Poland).

3

u/Vospader998 Mar 13 '26

Stuck between a rock and a hard place

1

u/Speedfreakz Mar 15 '26

Same with Serbia.

406

u/CTS99 Mar 13 '26

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DwKPFT-RioU This video visualizes the Numbers pretty well, it's almost incomprehensible for us to understand how many people really died

56

u/ActuatorLower8371 Mar 13 '26

fallen.io

one of my favorite data visualization projects

0

u/DinoTh3Dinosaur Mar 16 '26

I have to pay to view it like a ticket?

22

u/Cron414 Mar 14 '26

This should be the first reply. This video helps put the enormity of this conflict into a perspective most people have never had. A very important watch for anyone trying to understand WWII.

It brings tears to my eyes when it reveals the total Soviet deaths. It’s unimaginable in todays world. Pray nothing like this ever happens again.

6

u/CTS99 Mar 14 '26

Yeah, this ~40s silent scroll up do the Soviet deaths is insane... then you realize this was just the military casualties

291

u/BigfootEatsBabys Mar 13 '26

So about 1 in 25 people died during ww2. So crazy

15

u/Marlov Mar 14 '26

Hopefully nothing in future ever compares

→ More replies (10)

286

u/bannedforL1fe Mar 13 '26

Some of the worlds best people had to go and die. Their possible contributions to the world cannot even be comprehended.

131

u/HooptyDooDooMeister Mar 13 '26

On a smaller scale, this is how I view one part of 9/11 that people don't really talk about.

HDTV had burgeoning technology being developed in the twin towers. There were major setbacks to TV/satellite tech due to the amount of very talented people we lost in those attacks.

31

u/Seicair Mar 14 '26

Huh. I always thought the WTC was all financial stuff, didn’t realize there were research facilities there.

38

u/HooptyDooDooMeister Mar 14 '26

Not to be confused with research and development per se, the North Tower served as a critical operational testing and implementation hub for digital television (DTV) and high-definition broadcasting.

By the late 1990s, it was the central site for the early rollout of digital television in New York City, which was the essential precursor to high-definition TV.

In 1999, the antenna was upgraded to accommodate digital television broadcasts in a major industry-wide push toward high-definition standards assisting major networks (ABC, NBC, etc.) with their first digital and high-definition signals.

6 engineers died in the 2001 attacks. When the first plane struck the North Tower, these men stayed at their posts to call their respective master control rooms, alerting colleagues to the signal disruption and attempting to keep the broadcasts on the air as long as possible. Their loss was a significant blow to the engineering community, as they were the primary experts managing the city's modern digital infrastructure.

9

u/Seicair Mar 14 '26

That makes sense, thanks for explaining. You’re right, that is a mostly unknown facet of the 9/11 tragedy.

→ More replies (3)

29

u/Kharon_the_ferryman Mar 13 '26

This is always my thoughts on war. Imagine all the hard strong men and women that died in wars, all the bloodlines or future kids just erased, and all the innovations, ideas, and inventions they could have gone on to create. However we are left with the cowards, sickly, old, and cretin politicians surviving or staying out of the war. It's like the dregs get left and reproduce...

→ More replies (1)

58

u/RoadsideCampion Mar 13 '26

You should care before it starts to affect you too, the people who are already dying have lives just as valuable as yours

191

u/TazmaniannDevil Mar 13 '26 edited Mar 13 '26

Further disturbing stats:

Ally to Axis population ratio: 2:1

Current NATO to CSTO + China alone: 1:2

Casualty rate in modern war is Civ: 90% Mil: 10%

57

u/VisibleVersus Mar 13 '26

specifically for WW2, casualty rate in war estimated at 2:1 (Civilian: Military)

9

u/Outsider_4 Mar 13 '26

Casualty rate in WW2 was, either in Europe or Entirety (I'm really sorry, I don't remember exactly), roughly 70-30 Civ-Mil

1

u/Snoo63 Mar 16 '26

When does it stop being war, and start being a terroristic massacring? Is it just when it's a non-state actor doing the killing of civilians?

19

u/hippopotapistachio Mar 13 '26

Wow. This is helpful to internalize. 

77

u/imnotalexa Mar 13 '26

Those a pretty insane numbers! 😱

→ More replies (1)

88

u/tbodillia Mar 13 '26

About a third of the dead were Russian. Russia lost 12% of it's 1941 pre invasion population.

59

u/Cute_Committee6151 Mar 13 '26

Soviet, not Russian.

35

u/wargamer19 Mar 13 '26

Exactly. Much of the fighting was done by Ukrainians and Belarusians

0

u/mongooser Mar 13 '26

That’s what happens when you send soldiers to war without weapons. 

54

u/kuburas Mar 13 '26

Its what happens when you're fighting a war that you quite literally cannot afford to lose.

They got so desperate because if eastern front failed we'd all be speaking german today.

→ More replies (4)

17

u/Select_Discipline405 Mar 13 '26

that was a myth invented by the nazis

→ More replies (1)

41

u/[deleted] Mar 13 '26 edited Apr 02 '26

.

35

u/Zestyclose-Salary518 Mar 13 '26 edited Mar 13 '26

Actually I relooked at this and yes from disease and famine which were classified as natural deaths this is included overall as the statistic based off this source

13

u/SketchTeno Mar 13 '26

If they where, We are quickly approaching 100% death rate for all humans who were alive during ww2. Just a few decades left.

34

u/sneakin_rican Mar 13 '26

If you don’t think the citizenry of certain large well-armed nations would happily sacrifice 3-4% of the world for the promise of abundance you are kidding yourself. People just don’t care that much.

8

u/d1rty_j0ker Mar 13 '26

Lest we forget. If only our world leaders saw this as clearly as they should. It feels like we’re once again standing at the doorstep of another global conflict. We have no beef with each other. Live and let live

22

u/JrSoftDev Mar 13 '26

It's important to notice that WW3 would likely have an even higher %. Many areas in the World lost resilience - including environmental - and became completely dependent on the mechanisms deployed during the "peaceful decades", which includes "just in time" logistics. In 6 years of an "all out" war we would see 1 billion + deaths.

27

u/thehappyhobo Mar 13 '26

I remember a Dan Carlin episode about Hiroshima where he illustrated brilliantly how detached modern casual conversations are about the rights and wrongs of dropping the bomb. Truman was at the end of war where 100,000s and millions of people could die in weeks. 50,000 and a chance to an avoid an amphibious assault on Japan - not as heavy as decision as it would be today.

-16

u/BaconJakin Mar 13 '26

Anti-history take, all records show the Japanese were going to surrender regardless of a ground invasion before they were nuked. Their sole condition was that they’d get to keep the Emperor’s traditional role in-tact. The US wanted to show off their new toy, but wanted to do so on a civilian population instead of on a recorded warning. Why? Sure, it took a while to build those bombs, but we had two. I recommend reading more about the history behind these decisions before justifying the slaughter of 200,000 civilians.

8

u/SeaBass1690 Mar 14 '26

Most historians, including both Japanese and American, disagree with you. Make no mistake, the Japanese high command were well aware they would lose the war by the summer of ‘45, but the supreme war council still very much intended to fight a decisive battle on the Japanese home islands to force better surrender terms. Numerous military preparations were being made for Operation Ketsugō, a desperate plan for the islands’ defense. The IJN was all but destroyed but they still had millions of troops willing to fight to the death. Any surrender terms they had discussed at that point would have been completely unacceptable to the allies, like self disarmament, no occupation etc.

29

u/[deleted] Mar 13 '26

[deleted]

→ More replies (6)

9

u/AcherontiaPhlegethon Mar 13 '26

Patently false statement. Japan had no plans to surrender, and in fact still did not surrender after both bombs had fallen until the Hirohito forced the hand of the generals. There was a common phrase at the time that was roughly "The Glorious Death of One Hundred Million", the literal actual plan was to die to the last, as was what happened in the Pacific theatre, a war of attrition to beat the US's capacity to stomach death. That's why thousands of Japanese soldiers would die over tiny inconsequential islands, they could never hope to beat the US manufacturing capacity in the 40s. Before the bombs, women and children in mainland Japan were being trained to fight with spears for the purpose, the projected death toll of an invasion was expected to exceed 1 million just for the US, and likely matched or more for the Japanese.

→ More replies (1)

41

u/jackofslayers Mar 13 '26

Also 50% of all the Jews in the world.

25

u/Rabbit-Hole-Quest Mar 13 '26

Historians estimate that between 250,000 and 500,000 Romani people were killed by Nazis and their collaborators during WWII, representing around 50% of the estimated European Romani population at the time.

5

u/V__ Mar 14 '26 edited Apr 28 '26

nb: i have deleted this post and or comment
DM me if you need to know what it said

46

u/Smooth_Teacher_457 Mar 13 '26

Does this include the millions of Indians who were starved to death by the British, but we're not actively fighting?

85

u/SeemedReasonableThen Mar 13 '26

Yes, it does the 2-3 million Indians who starved to death or died by related diseases.

More than half the total deaths were USSR andd Republic of China.

Poland had the highest percentage of population killed, followed by Lithuania and USSR

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d1/World_War_II_Casualties.svg

22

u/John_cCmndhd Mar 13 '26

Probably. Wikipedia has an estimate of 60-75 million deaths, which includes 2-3 million famine deaths in India. Since OPs numbers are slightly higher, they probably include these as well

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties

3

u/gusgusfl Mar 14 '26

Are you counting Japan’s atrocities with the raping of nanking? I’ve heard they can’t even get a fair count so it ranges from like 1million-100million

1

u/Snoo63 Mar 16 '26

Didn't Japan's actions start before WW2 "officially" started?

8

u/natebam Mar 13 '26

Thank you for sharing.

6

u/AscendedViking7 Mar 13 '26

Jesus :(

3

u/murf43143 Mar 13 '26

You said it man

7

u/DingoPoutine Mar 13 '26

With resource scarcity coming down the road, this may just be the plan

8

u/yinsotheakuma Mar 13 '26

I don't know if you're one of those folks who reads the news, but these people have no plan. They're just doddering bubble babies.

3

u/The_Lloyd_Dobler Mar 13 '26

YSK that right-wing, Russian influenced political parties and governments are dismantling the post WW2 institutions and alliances that arose from that devastation. They don’t want to revise, reform, strengthen, or modernize - they want them gone.

2

u/emmynoether Mar 14 '26

75 million seems like a large number, but more than 100 million new humans were born in 2025. If 75 million people were to vanish right now, the world population will go back to what it was in ... mid 2025.

2

u/mw4365 Mar 15 '26

Overpopulation of the planet, the upper elite of the upper elite caught in an insane pedo/human trafficking ring, society reaching insane new levels of stupidity and ignorance despite the tools most are given

Almost as if there’s a massive case for another great reset eh?

0

u/AuraEnhancerVerse Mar 16 '26

Overpopulation of the planet

Most countries are complaining about low birth rates

1

u/Jobezu Mar 16 '26

Those aren't mutually exclusive

2

u/scalebirds Mar 13 '26

36% of all Jewish people died

From around 17 million prewar to 11 million after

In some places it was worse. 90% of the around 210,000 Jews in Lithuania were killed. From 210,000 people prewar to 20,000 alive after

2

u/elhaytchlymeman Mar 13 '26

And majority of them were civilian, not military

1

u/pthecarrotmaster Mar 13 '26

this and environmental district, and a big sexy recession to cap it all off. Then the robots can replace us

1

u/exotics Mar 13 '26

And the human population has more than doubled since that time. In fact it’s more than doubled since I was born, 61 years ago.

Our population is skyrocketing. Not just because of birth rates but mostly because we are not dying as young.

1

u/Errickbaldwin Mar 14 '26

Also no major world wars followed by major famine or plagues following

1

u/afCeG6HVB0IJ Mar 13 '26

Don't worry, the upcoming Water Wars will dwarf these numbers

1

u/The_Wkwied Mar 13 '26

If you zoom out and look at the number of preventable, not-natural age related deaths during the 20th century (1900 through 1999), the number is sickening.

1

u/hereforit166 Mar 13 '26

RemindMe! 1 year

1

u/SEE_RED Mar 13 '26

15-20% for ww3 easy.

1

u/DandyDan2 Mar 14 '26

What’s the over/under on Kalshi?

1

u/Better_Weakness7239 Mar 14 '26

This post gave Trump a hardon

1

u/Sweetishdruid Mar 14 '26

Those are covid numbers we can do better than that

1

u/RockyRockyRoads Mar 14 '26

I’d like to point out that the actually recent stability of no major world conflicts between superpowers is actually not normal. This era for the past 50 years of major superpowers not having hot wars is not the norm. Look at the 1700s-1800s constant warns between nation states going on somewhere in the world.

1

u/Speedfreakz Mar 15 '26

Yugoslavia suffered one of the highest proportional death tolls in WWII, with estimated total war-related deaths around 1 million, or roughly 10.8% including demographic losses.

Total Deaths: While early government estimates claimed 1.7 million (10.8% of the population), modern, verified estimates generally place the actual war dead closer to 1 million.

Civilian vs. Military: A significant portion of the deaths were civilians—roughly 500,000–600,000—including widespread genocide against Serbs, Jews, and Roma.

Key Atrocities: Jasenovac Concentration Camp: The Ustaše (Croatian Axis puppet regime) killed hundreds of thousands of Serbs, Jews, and Croat anti-fascists. Estimates for Serb victims by the Ustaše range between 300,000 and 350,000, with over 100,000 killed at Jasenovac alone.

Prior to that Serbia lost more than 20% of its population in ww1.

1

u/NVincarnate Mar 17 '26

So you're saying my odds are pretty good?

1

u/NutGobbler69420 Mar 19 '26

Lets see can we pump those numbers up up in WWIII!

1

u/algorithmicsapien Mar 13 '26

Even more died of smallpox virus than all the wars combined

1

u/rel1800 Mar 13 '26

They don’t mention that so many Russians died and they were in the lead for most deaths by a landslide. Also Russia fought 90% of the war against Germany then the US stepped in to finish it off.

1

u/OhSillyDays Mar 13 '26

World War 3: Hold my beer.

0

u/4gotOldU-name Mar 14 '26

So…. Why is it we should know?

Unsourced and basically an opinion post, designed for gathering information from replies people make because of what’s happening in the world today. And modern wars are completely different than what transpired in WWII and WWI.

0

u/Dontmakemeboss Mar 13 '26 edited Mar 13 '26

My Great Uncle (Mom’s side) and my Great Grandfather (Dad’s side)both died in WW 2. That both sides of my family were touched by that is insane to me and they fought for the United States, who lost way less people than other countries/militaries.

I often think about and am baffled by the destruction of WW 2 it truly should never happen again, but look around

0

u/MobiusDie Mar 13 '26

How much during Chinggis Khan or Mao Zedong?

0

u/stupidber Mar 13 '26

Thats bad

0

u/cecilmeyer Mar 14 '26

War should be illegal and declared a crime against all living beings and the planet.

I will see it oneday maybe not in this life but the one to come.