Just thought maybe you'd all find this funny.

Oh no how dare they possibly rip protected movie and documentary including ALU organizing documentary Union 2024 and they're still ripping as we typing out. They're ought to collect all labor organizing media before NSA Cloudflare successfully delist them all.

Video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxiI32V_xv4

Education and organizing resources

https://start.me/p/y94Q72/marxist-leninist-study-resources

For the full video, click here: https://youtu.be/s-s8IO7FAQo

Why are they investigating Shawn Fain and not TWU/ TWULocal 100?

Shawn Fain took a principled stance against the genocide in Gaza they were the first union to pass a resolution to condemn the U.S. involvement is genocide there are unions that have done worse things such as TWU President who called for the arrest of Palestinian protestors on college campuses and have had serious scandals but they have not been touched or even investigated. Shawn Fain cited the anger with his pro worker and pro Palestine stances. Hasan Piker on the broadcast stated he supports Shawn Fain and his fights. Do you support Shawn Fain and the UAW moral stances?

American women aren't overreacting — they're reading the documents. In this video, I go through what's actually on paper: the state-level push to repeal no-fault divorce, the post-Dobbs abortion landscape, the SAVE Act's documented impact on married women whose legal names don't match their birth certificates, and the growing number of women researching visas and exit plans. I also look at the women defending this project from inside it — including Erika Kirk and the broader "traditional womanhood" media ecosystem — and what their role tells us about how this gets sold.

This isn't a left-vs.-right story. It's a top vs. bottom story: who writes the rules, who absorbs the consequences, and who profits from women having fewer exits — from a marriage, from a state, or from the country. This video is commentary and analysis based on publicly available documents and reporting. Opinions are labeled as such.

Sources cited in this video are linked below. When I'm giving my opinion, I say so explicitly. Everything else is drawn from primary documents: bill text, court filings, and official records.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c0mYkjVBrqk, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q5LKmwJ_YVI, https://www.youtube.com/shorts/ffI6auMmhDA, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kMkk2QbWiA, https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1983013695888012, https://www.youtube.com/shorts/JGoymv33ZWc, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwZJ0mdZiEA, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bf7WkF8pydQ, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOWBx1AUr1w, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSz1txJEyv8, https://www.youtube.com/shorts/leZpgzX7OcM, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HaQL2uMA6cs, https://www.youtube.com/shorts/b3MA6G5oNp0