Quick reactions to the Houthi blockade on Saudi Arabia announced this morning, just before U.S. markets opened.
TL;DR: What matters isn’t just lost oil exports from Yanbu, but also lost Saudi and GCC grain IMPORTS through the Red Sea.
Basically, Iran and the Houthis are threatening the Saudi economy with exactly the sort of broad-based economic warfare the U.S. is subjecting Iran to through its blockade.
There are 5 major Saudi ports in the Red Sea. From north to south they are Duba, Yanbu, King Abdullah, Jeddah and Jazan. Southern ports are most exposed to Houthi attack.
Yanbu sends 4.5 mb/d of oil into global markets. If Houthi attacks shut down operations for a meaningful span, that’s obviously a big blow to markets.
But since the Iran War shut down Hormuz, Saudi’s Red Sea coast has become ever more crucial for dry goods imports like wheat, rice, consumer goods, etc., flowing not just to Saudi markets but other Gulf countries, too.
Saudi Arabia has massive wheat stockpiles, enough for 4-6 months of normal consumption. But they don’t have large reserves of rice or feed grains, meaning that other pantry staples and dairy/meat production could be more affected.
It’s highly unlikely that anyone in Saudi or the Gulf countries will starve if food imports are curtailed, even for months.
But it will make like unpleasant for those living there. Scarcity will push local inflation — prices of food and consumer goods will go up, putting pressure on the government to change its policies.
Does that sound familiar? Again it’s the basic strategy the U.S. is trying to pressure Iran, without much luck so far.
One other thought: It’s noteworthy that the blockade is targeting Saudi Arabia specifically, not international shipping through the Bab-el-Mandeb strait.
The targeted approach suggests to me that Iran and the Houthis are trying to keep a handle on escalation, and to show restraint but also hold capacity in reserve to target all shipping should the conflict escalate further.