Disclosure, for all intents and purpose.
I am by any stretch, rather confounding as an individual. Sure, everyone wants to be special, I am special in a way that is not often comfortable for myself or usually for others. Now the latest Disclosure Day film, and his previous Taken show, indicated a potential for there being hybrids here on the planet, and whatever that might mean is up to all of us to determine. I would hesitantly say that I am similar to one of these individuals, but would not go so far as to say the worldview from which the idea is derived is at all accurate. Disclosure is—for all intents and purposes—meant to establish and correct a certain worldview in and around the topic of what we presently consider alien beings, this narrative establishes humanity against or in contention with a power, from another place (or time), and further, that this happened rather suddenly to humanity, and has not been here all the while. What I intend here with these sentiments are to establish a historical underpinning of a narrative quite different, and through what I think the real storied perspective is.
A storied perspective of the “alien” endeavor, is plainly outlined in Chinese mythology, with what is considered the “Mandate of Heaven,” and it is, exactly, and literally, that. As psychological and technological shifts occur, the situation around these beings change with each passing governing body. The Mandate of Heaven, passes from one to the next to the next, where the idea is a kind of control over the population, so that we here under “heaven” can be amenably challenged in order to progress through reality. We are all souls embodying a physical shell, the mandate of heaven is to establish grounds here on earth for us to employ ourselves by way of challenge, and conflict, so we might find ourselves uniquely, “On earth as they are in heaven.” The Mandate of Ancient Rome fell when religion became destabilized, and those began losing faith in the gods, so the cult of Christianity centralized religion, destabilized government, burned the records at Alexandria, and became the vocal powerhouse of this Mandate from a central location. I don’t really care about spelling all this out in a storied timeline, essentially the Mandate moves from power to power, so that we can amenably be challenged as Soul beings. Eventually the United States runs into this reality, and realizing this, decide to harbor the Mandate by way of secrecy. Each turn of power decide on how they approach the mandate, with the Catholic Church it was by way of veiled and inaccurate religiosity, and this did not change when materialism took philosophical center-stage. The Ancient-Chinese was simply literal, and they have not strayed far in modernity with Wuxia fictions, where the beings of Heaven are seen represented in Ne zha 2. Each Power decide on how to conceal these truths from the public, so that they might create a proper ground for all of us to experience gradual-conscious growth.
The reason we are seeing problems in and around disclosure presently, is the Mandate of Heaven is meant to be held by way of secrecy here in the States. Heaven does not like to intervene, and what we know from our own lore from the military meeting with the beings is, the military was frightened by their experience. The rest of the information we have is a kind of antagonistic relationship, where it seems the military made some kind of agreement with the beings: technology for abductions. What we can gleam from this through the lens of the Mandate of Heaven is, the military met with Heaven, and because the beings are psychic, the military could not hide their intention to prepare and fight the beings at a future date, so the beings asked for abductions in order to create a backup-plan, to establish order—after the military fails—with minimal interference. The axis for so called “disclosure” is faith in the reality the government has established, as they need veritable power in order to establish the mandate, and when lost: calls for intervention. Belief or disbelief in aliens is within the narrative of the military, and as expected, so when believed and narrativized this falls within the bounds of the aforementioned mandate. What the next generation of military-government learned was how real all this is, and had to deal with the decisions of previous generations. So they needed to either follow-through with fighting literal heaven, or create a kind of play so that narrative control is re-established, and all the missing pieces align from previous decisions, hybrids, aliens, etc. China does not have this issue, as the backdrop of their fictions is somewhat different, heaven can be both divine and exacting, cruel and benevolent, so when they say, “ignore aliens,” this can make local cultural sense. In the States however, we do not have such conceptions, so the narrative is rather culturally-destabilizing. And there is an overlooked evidence crumb here, in one of the missing 411 films, a ‘definitely-not-intelligence-super-genius’ went missing, but before he embarked on a seeming one way trip, he left his mother two books to take out, one being Dante’s inferno, and the other being a battle with the gods (or something like that)—I forget all the details, but generally, the message was, he left to fight the gods.
There are two primary driving philosophies from the Ancient Chinese perspective, they both hold the same kind of idea, which is: reality is consciousness, and the self is an acting agent within this substrate. The Buddhist perspective seeks to null the ego, to devoid the self in order to become above it. The Daoist perspective thinks it can preserve the self, cultivating a unique perspective into self-relationship with reality. Both have and ignore the heavenly realms directly, indirectly though, there is a rough outline that holds similar underpinnings worldwide. Understanding both are literal valid approaches to reality, and they are not describing a religiosity, but simply a fundamental aspect of reality, then the world becomes quite different, and heaven is less, “Jesus and angels fighting the devil” and more along the lines of: Anything goes, so long as it is genuine. Keeping the narrative within that “heaven and hell” ideology is useful to propel the previous mandate, as it falls within previous control metrics. But truthfully, this space is not meant to control all of us, it is meant to be a space for all of us to establish our own unique understanding of reality independently, allowing for both paths: the null (buddhist) or the individual (daoist), by way of a genuinely cultivated relationship between consciousness and conscious-reality.
The further tie to disclosure day, and taken within the realm of the “Mandate of Heaven” philosophy is in how shaman or spirit talkers were originally derived. In Ancient-Chinese, these were genealogical lines, when the state failed to maintain the mandate, it passed onto the peasant class who had their Shaman. What the shaman looked like in Eliade’s various explorations of the notion were markedly similar, no matter where one looked. Further, they were genealogical, as per Eliade, and some were called to it. Each Shaman though, by Eliade’s findings, are initiated by being taken into the sky by heavenly beings and being dissected—these are storied accounts from spoken word tribal peoples, from many divergent storied and old investigations on the notion.
The religious perspective is not just my own, you can look at Benebell Wen for literally this interpretation of Ancient Chinese philosophy, I have simply applied it to the alien phenomena, but the worldview is not distinct from the alien phenomena either, as the metal element within the worldview is vaguely representative of the phenomena itself. The beings being psychic and having had a meeting can be found in our own alien lore. Abductions can be found in a book by the same title, by John Mac. And what abductions do can be found historically recorded and documented by Mircea Eliade in Shamanism as I’ve already alluded to.
For anyone to see what I have, one simply needs to apply what the Mandate of Heaven is to history, literally, and then everything elegantly falls into place. If you want receipts, look at the names I’ve provided. Now, I don’t care what is believed. I find it interesting and fun how the mandate is moving about, and I’m curious what might happen with it. I don’t really care for the whole ‘violent-storied’ approach, but if that’s the way they go with it, so be it. I avoided touching on specifics, but there are ties there too, to politics, and shifting narratives, I am simply compelled to speak in the way that I have, and hope now to be left alone on the topic so I can go about my day.
Thanks.