That was my comment under the post. What do you think? Maybe I’m just missing something, or maybe there’s a flaw in my reasoning:
What bothers me about images of black triangles (whether they’re supposed to depict a TR-3B or whatever the object actually is) is that, regardless of whether they’re labeled as authentic or AI-generated, the viewing angle and perspective often don’t make geometric sense.
If we assume this is the classic flat triangular craft with a distinct top and bottom, oriented horizontally with its large triangular surfaces parallel to the ground and the sky—as it’s usually depicted—then the perspective in this image is incorrect.
The object appears either as if its main triangular face were oriented vertically, or as if it had the shape of a pyramid, with us actually looking at one of its four triangular sides.
If we instead assume the conventional flat triangular UAP, you shouldn’t be able to see such a large, fully defined black triangle from this viewing angle. Due to perspective, only a much smaller foreshortened underside should be visible. A silhouette like the one shown here would only make sense if the observer were directly beneath, or very close to directly beneath, the craft—which clearly doesn’t seem to be the case in this image.