I’ve been a longtime Sibelius user and arranger, and over the last several versions I’ve noticed something increasingly concerning: not just bugs or UI changes, but the quiet removal of workflow-critical functions that many working musicians, educators, and arrangers rely on every day.
This isn’t about “advanced engraving.”
This is about core functionality that directly affects real-world chart preparation and part extraction.
The latest issue that pushed me over the edge involves multirests.
The Multirest Problem
In current versions of Sibelius Artist:
- the Parts tab may appear entirely greyed out
- Layout > Breaks > Show Multirests has disappeared
- multirest controls appear removed entirely
- older files preserve previous multirest states
- newer files inherit different default states
- users can no longer reliably toggle the feature on or off
The result is bizarre and workflow-breaking behavior:
- older projects may be permanently stuck with multirests OFF
- newer projects may be permanently stuck with multirests ON
- two nearly identical scores can behave completely differently
- the setting still exists internally, but users can no longer access it
This creates a situation where hidden file states determine whether parts function correctly, while the user no longer has control over the feature.
That is not simplification.
That is loss of functionality.
This Is Not a Minor Feature
For those who don’t prepare professional charts regularly, this may sound small.
It is not.
Multirests are fundamental to:
- big band arranging
- pit orchestra prep
- session charts
- educational ensembles
- commercial copying
- clean rehearsal parts
- efficient page turns
- readability under pressure
Removing manual control over multirests is equivalent to removing paragraph formatting from a word processor and saying:
“Don’t worry, it’s automatic now.”
Professional users need control.
The Bigger Pattern
This issue does not exist in isolation.
Over time, many longtime Sibelius users have noticed:
- more functions moved behind the Ultimate paywall
- formerly accessible tools disappearing from Artist
- UI functions becoming hidden or inconsistent
- keyboard shortcuts no longer matching visible menus
- older documentation no longer applying
- legacy workflows silently breaking
- licensing/account confusion through Avid Link
- settings and engraving options becoming harder to locate or inaccessible
The frustrating part is that these are often not communicated clearly.
Features simply disappear.
Users are left wondering:
- Is this a bug?
- Is this corruption?
- Is this intentional?
- Is this version-specific?
- Is my installation broken?
Hours get wasted troubleshooting things that ultimately turn out to be removed functionality.
The Real Damage: Workflow Trust
The biggest problem here is not any single missing feature.
It’s loss of trust.
Professional users need to know:
- that files will behave consistently
- that established workflows won’t suddenly vanish
- that older projects remain editable
- that critical part-preparation tools remain accessible
- that software updates won’t quietly reduce capability
When a notation program becomes unpredictable, users stop trusting it in professional environments.
That is dangerous territory for software used in:
- live performance
- publishing
- rehearsals
- education
- commercial arranging
Competing Against Dorico and MuseScore
This is also happening at the worst possible time.
Dorico continues gaining traction among engravers and arrangers because:
- features are actively expanding
- workflows feel modern
- users feel listened to
Meanwhile, MuseScore has improved dramatically and now offers surprisingly capable engraving for free.
Sibelius still has strengths:
- speed
- familiarity
- efficient note entry
- a huge legacy user base
But longtime users are increasingly asking:
“Why are core workflows becoming harder instead of better?”
This Matters for Education Too
Many schools, community ensembles, semi-professional arrangers, and freelancers use Sibelius Artist specifically because Ultimate pricing is difficult to justify.
These users are not hobbyists.
They are:
- music educators
- volunteer arrangers
- jazz band leaders
- community orchestra librarians
- working musicians preparing parts on deadlines
Removing essential layout and part-management functions disproportionately hurts the exact people who helped make Sibelius the industry standard in the first place.
What I’d Like to See
At minimum:
- Restore manual multirest controls in Artist
- Clearly document which functions have been removed
- Stop hiding workflow changes inside updates
- Preserve backward compatibility for existing files
- Improve communication with long-term users
- Focus on workflow stability, not just subscription segmentation
Final Thought
Most longtime Sibelius users don’t want to leave.
We stayed because the software became part of our musical workflow and professional identity.
But when fundamental functions disappear, trust erodes.
And once users rebuild their workflow elsewhere, they rarely come back.