r/MedievalMythBuster 36m ago

Chronicle – posts that quote or analyse primary sources. Charles I The King Who Refused the Court

Thumbnail
youtube.com
Upvotes

r/MedievalMythBuster 2d ago

A royal clerk crossed out a fugitive’s real name and wrote “Robin Hood” instead. That’s the earliest record we have of the name at all. Berkshire, 1261 to 1262.

Post image
1 Upvotes

r/MedievalMythBuster 3d ago

The Land Record — Episode 4: 1830 to the Present Day

Post image
1 Upvotes

r/MedievalMythBuster 18d ago

The Peasants’ Revolt started with a tax audit that didn’t add up.

Post image
1 Upvotes

r/MedievalMythBuster 19d ago

Charles I called himself “the martyr of the people.” He didn’t mean what you think he meant. (1649)

Post image
1 Upvotes

r/MedievalMythBuster 21d ago

King Arthur — What the Sources Actually Say | The Black Archive

Thumbnail
youtube.com
1 Upvotes

The earliest surviving account of post-Roman Britain was written around 540 AD. It describes the Saxon invasions, the British resistance, and the battle of Badon Hill. It names the leader who turned the tide.

That name is not Arthur.

This episode traces the documentary record from Gildas in 540 to Geoffrey of Monmouth in 1138 to the French romances of the twelfth and thirteenth centuries. Every major element of the Arthurian legend has a first appearance date. This video establishes what those dates are.

Primary sources examined: Gildas, De Excidio et Conquestu Britanniae · Historia Brittonum · Annales Cambriae · Geoffrey of Monmouth, Historia Regum Britanniae · Wace, Roman de Brut · Chrétien de Troyes · Thomas Malory, Le Morte d'Arthur

Full case file at The Black Archive on Substack — link in profile.


r/MedievalMythBuster 21d ago

Magna Carta did not protect ordinary people. It protected barons. The popular account of it as a charter of universal liberties was invented four centuries later. (1215)

Post image
1 Upvotes

r/MedievalMythBuster 23d ago

The heel everyone knows about Achilles doesn’t appear anywhere in Homer. It doesn’t appear for another thousand years.

Post image
1 Upvotes

r/MedievalMythBuster 25d ago

They were both convicted of murdering him. The trial never established which one actually did it. (1849)

Post image
1 Upvotes

r/MedievalMythBuster 26d ago

Chronicle – posts that quote or analyse primary sources. The Blank Roll: A kingdom in Revolt

Post image
1 Upvotes

England, 1377. The Crown has learned to count the poor.

Before revolt becomes history, it begins as a whisper — in a village, on a roll, in the space between a name and a number.

The Blank Roll. Available now on Amazon.

https://amzn.eu/d/01OsUSFc

#TheBlankRoll #HistoricalFiction #MedievalHistory #PeasantsRevolt #BookTok #HistFic #LiteraryFiction #SamuelStephen #TheBlackArchive #BookRecommendations #HistoryBooks #MedievalEngland #NewRelease #IndieAuthor #ReadingCommunity


r/MedievalMythBuster 28d ago

Chronicle – posts that quote or analyse primary sources. The Blank Roll: A Kingdom in Revolt

Thumbnail amzn.eu
1 Upvotes

The Blank Roll: A Kingdom in Revolt

England, 1377. The King is dead, a new poll tax is coming, and the Crown's reach is extending further into village life than anyone can remember.

For Alys Carter, it arrives as a knock at the door and a question about names. For Walter Tyrell, the village reeve, it arrives as a roll he must keep honestly — until honesty itself becomes dangerous. For Geoffrey Chaucer, Comptroller of Wool Custom, it arrives as columns of figures that refuse to agree.

By June 1381, the commons of England are marching on London. Wat Tyler's name is on every road. The Savoy is burning. At Smithfield, everything hangs in the balance.

But while London burns, Walter is hiding a document in a church strongbox. Alys is leaving the door unbarred at night. And Thomas Carter is somewhere on the road between Smithfield and home.

The Blank Roll is a literary historical novel about the people history forgot to record — and what it cost them to live through a summer that history has never stopped talking about.


r/MedievalMythBuster Jun 21 '26

A man died with a stomach full of chloroform and no burns anywhere in his throat. His wife was acquitted. A surgeon supposedly asked her to explain it — except that quote was overheard gossip, written down 53 years later. (1886)

Post image
1 Upvotes

r/MedievalMythBuster Jun 13 '26

A future king of England was saved from a mob by a man named John Ferrour. Except he might have been called Rochester. And he might not have existed. (1381)

Post image
1 Upvotes

r/MedievalMythBuster Jun 10 '26

Chronicle – posts that quote or analyse primary sources. A federal court declared her employer's business an illegal monopoly. Her name isn't in the decree. It isn't in the trade press either. It wasn't supposed to be. (1908–1915)

Thumbnail
1 Upvotes

r/MedievalMythBuster Jun 07 '26

They buried him under the kitchen floor in quicklime. A constable noticed the flagstone was damp. Her last words in court were that the English were a perfidious race. (1849)

Post image
1 Upvotes

r/MedievalMythBuster Jun 03 '26

Rio Incognitum — Official Book Trailer

Thumbnail
1 Upvotes

r/MedievalMythBuster May 26 '26

He confessed to starting the Great Fire of London. He wasn’t in the country when it began. They hanged him anyway. (1666)

Post image
1 Upvotes

r/MedievalMythBuster May 23 '26

The king died in the forest. His brother took the treasury before the burial. His brother was crowned three days later. (1100)

Post image
1 Upvotes

r/MedievalMythBuster May 16 '26

A Scottish clan chief rode out to meet his king in 1530. He was hanged without trial. The royal household book does not record his name. Three days later the king granted his lands to the lord who had protected him. (1530)

Post image
0 Upvotes

r/MedievalMythBuster May 14 '26

Anne Boleyn was charged with adultery on specific dates at specific locations. Her own surviving letter contradicts one of those dates outright. The man who built the case admitted he devised it. Parliament quietly fixed the legal problem six years later. (1536)

Post image
1 Upvotes

r/MedievalMythBuster May 09 '26

King James VI personally interrogated a woman for witchcraft in 1590. He called the accused extreme liars. She whispered something to him privately. He ordered her execution. The record does not say what she said. (1590)

Post image
1 Upvotes

r/MedievalMythBuster May 09 '26

King James VI personally interrogated a woman for witchcraft in 1590. He called the accused extreme liars. She whispered something to him privately. He ordered her execution. The record does not say what she said. (1590)

Post image
1 Upvotes

r/MedievalMythBuster May 07 '26

The Queen’s secretary warned the Spanish ambassador that Lord Robert’s wife was about to be killed. Three days later, she was found dead. The inquest record disappeared for 447 years. (1560)

Post image
2 Upvotes

r/MedievalMythBuster May 01 '26

Two senior British officials were stabbed to death in Phoenix Park, Dublin in 1882. Five men were hanged. The man alleged to have directed the operation was never tried. (1882)

Post image
1 Upvotes

r/MedievalMythBuster Apr 30 '26

THE BLACK ARCHIVE — Episode 3: The Jane Clouson Case, 1871 | Full Episode

1 Upvotes
Full archive and show notes at theblackarchiveuk.substack.com

She was found dying in a lane in south-east London at a quarter past four in the morning. She was seventeen years old. She was approximately two months pregnant. The man tried for her murder was acquitted in twenty minutes.

On the morning of Wednesday 26 April 1871, Police Constable Gunn found Jane Maria Clouson in Kidbrooke Lane, near Eltham, on her hands and knees in the dark. Blood about her head and face. She said: O my poor head. She said: Take hold of my hand. She fell forward and said: Let me die. She made no further reply.

She had been in domestic service with a stationer's family in Greenwich for nearly two years. She had left that household a fortnight before the attack. Nothing was taken from her in the lane. Her purse contained eleven shillings and fourpence. Her hat was lying nearby, undamaged and not dirty.

She died at Guy's Hospital four days later. She was still unidentified at the hour of her death. Her aunt identified her the following morning by her nose, her mouth, a mole on the right breast, and her dress. The wounds to her face had been too severe for recognition alone.

A young man named Edmund Walter Pook, son of the stationer in whose household Jane had worked, was charged with her wilful murder. Two women told police that Jane had said she was going to meet him that night to arrange the preliminaries of marriage. A plasterer's hammer with blood and hair in the notch was found in the grounds of Morden College nearby. Blood and a hair corresponding in colour with Jane's were found on Pook's clothing. An ironmonger identified Pook as having sought to purchase that type of hammer two days before the attack, saying it was wanted for a theatrical performance.

Pook denied everything on oath. He said he had never had any intimacy with Jane Clouson, never made an appointment to meet her, never walked out with her, never corresponded with her. He said he had been in Lewisham that evening attempting to visit a young woman and had not seen her. He said the blood on his hat came from his tongue, bitten in a fit. No medical witness was called to confirm he suffered from fits.

The trial lasted four days at the Central Criminal Court before the Lord Chief Justice. The judge ruled that all statements Jane had allegedly made before her death were inadmissible hearsay. The jury deliberated for twenty minutes.

Not guilty.

The crowd outside the court reacted with anger. Greenwich saw riotous demonstrations within days. Pook's house was mobbed. A pamphlet appeared attacking the verdict and the hearsay ruling. Libel proceedings were brought. Civil damages of forty shillings were awarded.

A monument was erected in Brockley Cemetery by public subscription. Its inscription calls Jane's death a murder. It records her last words as: Oh, let me die.

No one was ever convicted of killing her.

The part of the record that remains unresolved is the precise sequence of events in the lane on the night of 25 April. The version of her final words given by the officer who found her differs from the version on the memorial. A later source adds the name Edmund Pook to what she said. The pamphlet, written by a man who believed Pook was guilty, explicitly states that only Oh, let me die was intelligible, and that nothing she uttered at the hospital was distinctly audible.

The record does not reconcile these accounts.

Primary source: Old Bailey Proceedings, trial of Edmund Walter Pook, July 1871.

Full episode — one hour fifty, reconstructed from the primary record: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ow2bAuq7tJE

The jury deliberated for twenty minutes after four days of evidence. Does that duration suggest they found the circumstantial case straightforwardly insufficient — or that the removal of the hearsay evidence had stripped the prosecution of the one thing that might have anchored it?

More cases at The Black Archive — link in profile.