r/GrowthHacking • u/NoSituation5132 • 5h ago
Ran a small agency for years. The "just use an ai content generator" pitch is costing my clients more than it saves.
Every founder who hires us now opens with some version of "can't we just run this through an ai content generator and cut the retainer." Fair question. So last quarter I actually tested it instead of arguing.
Took two similar clients, same niche, same budget band. One got our normal process. The other we ran mostly on generated first drafts with a light human pass, the setup everyone swears is "good enough now."
The generated one published faster, sure. More posts, more pages, prettier calendar. Three months in the numbers weren't close. The human-led client booked more calls off less content. The generated client got traffic that didn't do anything, plus a pile of pages we're now quietly pruning because they were dragging the domain.
The thing nobody selling the shortcut mentions: the generator doesn't know which three things your customers actually care about. It averages. And averaged content ranks and reads like averaged content. You still need someone who has talked to the customers to point it at the right problem, and that someone is the expensive part you were trying to remove.
I'm not anti the tools, we use them daily for grunt work. But "replace the thinking" and "speed up the typing" are different products, and half the market is buying the first one believing it's the second.
Anyone actually seeing generated-first content convert, not just publish? Genuinely asking, because I keep not finding it.