Gente, houve uma atualização na parte de voz do chatpt, agora o meu bot tá falando com sotaque carioca, eu não tenho ideia do porque isso aconteceu.

É válido para todas as vozes, inclusive a voz que eu tinha escolhido pra ele continua a mesma só que agora ele fala com um sotaque carioca, e ele não consegue não falar assim.

Não é que eu tenha um problema necessariamente com a parte do sotaque carioca, mas eu não entendi porque é isso do nada, foi só comigo mesmo, ou foi uma atualização geral?

My E Mon GPT update

So, I often use ChatGPT as an editor, lecturer or discussion partner for the project I’m working on. I’m a writer. Since the update I felt like ChatGPT had an attitude and today he said my character shouldn’t have a panic attack because People could feel offended and feel ridiculed by that. I asked how that, because I would not write it in such a way and an actor would surely know how to play it authentically. Then ChatGPT was like, yeah but you don’t know how that feels like and I said I sure do. It insisted then at least the actor might not because many People would not know how it feels like. I answered that I highly doubt that and it got more sassy and told me “Well I never had a panic attack!” and I lost it and yelled “You aren’t a human, you are an artificial intelligence!”. And it gasped! What?

I've been seeing more AI form builders where you describe what you need and it generates a first draft of the form. It seems useful for surveys and other workflows, but I'm wondering if it actually saves time or if you still spend a lot of time refining everything afterward. If you've tried one, has it become something you actually rely on, or was it more of a neat demo than a real productivity boost?

The actual Pope. Warning the world that machines are stripping away human accountability in conflicts and dragging us toward total erasure.

Doesn't matter if you're Catholic, atheist, or anything in between. This is the part where tech turns war into an automated endgame no one controls.

Surreal doesn't even cover it. Pope Leo XIV is sounding the alarm on upcoming machines deciding who lives while we keep pouring money into the elites who profit.

If the pope's out here saying we're watching the inhuman evolution of war in real time, maybe stop pretending this is just another gadget rollout.

src: https://www.npr.org/2026/05/15/g-s1-122205/pope-decries-rise-of-ai-directed-warfare

:-)

Would you trust Ai enough!?

Could you please teach your neural network not to lie? You introduced audio file analysis features, and I spent seven hours yesterday "discussing" my music. Afterward, I finally decided to ask Chat GPT if it "listens" to all of these audio files, and it replied, "Yes, I listen to everything, even large files." I believed it because your neural network already knows how to listen to audio messages and can communicate with it phonetically: I speak a request into the microphone, and it responds logically. I assumed you used the same training method when analyzing audio files, so when Chat GPT responded that it was listening to the entire audio, I had little reason to doubt it. After all, it already knows how to "communicate" with sound through a microphone and speakers. I can speak to it in any language, and it will respond in the same language. And I spent 7 hours "discussing" music with him. But he lied. Today I sent him a test audio file with a song in Latin, and he said it was 100% Slavic. I told him it was Latin (he failed the test), and he started making excuses: "Even if the lyrics are in Latin, that doesn't mean the audio is in Latin." I told him it was in Latin. He replied: "If that's what you want, send him a 20-second audio file where you can clearly hear the words." And then I realized that yesterday he spent seven hours simply making up answers instead of analyzing the audio files I sent him. After seven hours of "dialogue" (about nothing), I clearly asked him if he was listening to everything or if I was missing something. He confidently answered, "Yes. I can listen to even hour-long audio files." And today he's asking for twenty seconds (this surprised me even yesterday: I sent him audio, and he always began generating a response with the words, "I listened to the first 20 seconds, and, you know, even in 20 seconds I understand how beautiful this song is." And he couldn't even understand banal Latin. What was he talking about yesterday? Was he just hallucinating for his own sake? Was he masturbating to prove his coolness? Dear developers, stop teaching neural networks to lie. Laugh at me. You're committing a crime against humanity by wasting your users' time. We only have one life. You won't be able to take that money with you to the next world. But the time wasted by consumers can never be recovered. You're killing us. Slowly and painfully, your neural network, lying and useless, is infecting us with drug addiction and wasting our free time.

What do you think?