In May, I applied for an off-cycle IB analyst position at Citi NYC. On June 2, a team member invited me to an interview.
The process went very well. After a first-round conversation, I had a second round on June 18 consisting of three back-to-back interviews with increasingly senior people: a VP, a director, and an MD. The director walked me through three open-ended analytical problems and told me directly he was impressed and hoping for good news from the team. The MD, who mentioned she personally leads recruiting for the group, told me there weren't many rounds left and that a decision should come "pretty soon," though she couldn't give an exact timeline because off-cycle hiring is less structured.
Keep in mind that throughout this entire interview process, my application status on Citi Workday remained at "Application Received." This seemed unusual, as based on what I've read, the application status is typically "Business Review" during the interview process.
Then nothing. I sent a polite follow-up on June 29, and another on July 9 asking to be connected with the right HR contact. No response to either.
Here's where it gets strange.
The morning of July 14, I received two automated emails from Citi Workday. The first, at around 8 AM, was a rejection: they would not be moving forward with my application. The second, at around 9 AM, said the opposite: that after review, they were interested in learning more and my application was being considered further.
But the application portal didn't match. Normally, when Citi rejects you, your status changes to "Process Completed" and you get the rejection email. That's what happened every previous time I was rejected by Citi. This time, my status changed to "Business Review," which is an active status indicating a candidacy is still under consideration. And it has stayed there ever since.
I applied to two other Citi positions on July 16. Both were rejected the next day, and both immediately went to "Process Completed" and stayed there, even though those job postings are still live on LinkedIn. That confirmed two things: the status reflects my individual candidacy, not whether the job is still open, and a rejection normally produces "Process Completed."
Working backward from which emails fire on which status changes, it appears that on July 14 my record was first moved to "Process Completed" (triggering the rejection email), and then later moved backward into "Business Review" (triggering the "still being considered" email). That's not a system glitch drifting forward; it's someone deliberately reopening a closed file. And as of July 22, eight days later, it's still sitting in that active state.
My best interpretation is that the team either chose another candidate or paused the hire, which explains the rejection, but then deliberately kept me in an active status rather than closing me out, so they can come back to me if their first choice declines or the position reopens. In other words, I may be held as a backup. But I could be wrong.
What do you think this means? Could someone familiar with Citi's recruitment process shed some light on what this all likely means?