Anyone else bullish about the $ETC halving happening in less than 14 hours?

On July 20, 2016, at block 1,920,000, Ethereum Foundation hard forked to reverse the DAO hack — rewriting the ledger to claw back the ~3.6M ETH drained from the DAO contract. That new, rewritten chain is what everyone now calls Ethereum (ETH).

But not everyone followed. A group of miners, users, and developers kept running the original chain — the one without the rollback. They didn't create anything new; they just refused to abandon the rules. That original chain is Ethereum Classic (ETC).

It was expected to die. No branding, no exchange support, no roadmap — the name "Ethereum Classic" didn't even exist yet. Then a pseudonymous miner known as Wiz pointed his hashpower at the unforked chain and kept it alive through the first hours. Within days, exchanges listed it — Poloniex on July 24, Kraken on the 26th, Bitfinex right after. By mid-August, supporters published a Declaration of Independence: "This is not a new chain. This is Ethereum." No premine, no bailout, no insiders — a fair continuation of the original ledger.

Ten years later, that decision has held up:

- 100% ledger immutability since genesis — no rollbacks, no rewrites, no discretionary monetary policy

- The most secure Proof-of-Work smart contract platform in the world

- Fixed supply (~210M cap), full EVM compatibility, disinflationary by design

- From "the chain that refused to die" to the backbone of programmable Proof-of-Work finance

The whole split came down to one question: can you rewrite a ledger to undo a bad outcome? ETH said yes, once. ETC said no, ever. That's the entire difference — and it's why "Code is Law" still means something here.

And the story isn't finished. With the Olympia upgrade on the horizon, ETC is working toward becoming the first financially sovereign Proof-of-Work network — one that funds its own development without foundations or premines.

Full ten-year writeup here:

https://coinmarketcap.com/community/articles/687d33500973d947194ba4bf/

Ten years unforked. One ledger, never rewritten.

I did an exhaustive structural assessment of Ethereum Classic (ETC) today using our upgraded terminal metrics over at Crypto Weeklies. As the broader cryptocurrency index grinds through a volatile cycle bottoming phase, ETC has executed a complete purge of its downside risk premium, compressing its raw mathematical risk metrics into our absolute highest conviction long-term spot accumulation tiers. Here is the raw data breakdown of where the asset stands based on my charts.

The "High-Value Settlement" Economic Model

The most honest answer to how ETC scales without Layer 2 is that it doesn't try to handle cheap, high-volume retail traffic.

ETC does not want to host high-frequency gaming, micro-transaction social media apps, or thousands of speculative meme coins. Because its throughput is limited, its long-term scaling strategy is economic, not technical:

• The Paradigm: ETC positions itself as an unchangeable, hyper-secure Layer 1 Settlement Chain for high-value transactions.
• If the network becomes crowded, gas fees will naturally rise. When gas fees rise, low-value use cases are priced out and forced to move to cheaper chains like Solana or Base.
• ETC is perfectly content letting those networks handle mass consumer traffic, while its own 25 Transactions Per Second base layer is reserved for institutional capital, major decentralized finance (DeFi) liquidity pools, and immutable smart contracts that prioritize "Code is Law" security above all else.

For instance, using Ethereum Classic (ETC) for an automated sovereign trust scenario offers three distinct architectural and operational advantages over trying to manually replicate it using a standard Bitcoin (BTC) wallet.

While Bitcoin is the absolute king of security and monetary scarcity, using a standard BTC wallet for a long-term, structured distribution requires you to trust yourself or a third party to behave perfectly in the future. ETC shifts that trust entirely into mathematical code.

1. Removing Human Vulnerability (The Custody Trap)

With a standard Bitcoin wallet, the coins are either in your possession or they aren't.

• The Bitcoin Scenario: If you have $50 million in a BTC cold storage wallet and you want to withdraw 5% a year, you hold the keys to 100% of the funds at all times. If a corrupt local government discovers you have that seed phrase, they can coerce or force you to hand over the entire $50 million all at once. There is no native setting on a standard Bitcoin wallet to say, "No matter what I type, only let me take out 5% right now."
• The ETC Scenario: The code enforces the boundary. When you interact with an ETC smart contract vault, you physically cannot withdraw more than 5%, even if a hostile actor is standing over your shoulder forcing you to try. The protocol will reject the transaction. Your multi-generational safety net is protected from external coercion because the code strips away your own ability to liquidate it.

2. Autonomy vs. Ongoing Active Management

Managing a $50 million estate over 15 to 30 years requires immense operational overhead if done manually.

• The Bitcoin Scenario: To execute a disciplined multi-generational payout, you have to log in manually every year, safely coordinate the transaction from cold storage without making a critical copy-paste error, and manage the keys actively. If the head of the family passes away unexpectedly, the rest of the family must perfectly navigate the highly technical process of recovering those exact raw keys without losing the funds.
• The ETC Scenario: The smart contract acts as an automated, immortal fiduciary executor. You deploy it once, and it runs autonomously for a century. You can hardcode conditional logic natively into the EVM: for instance, "If Key A doesn't ping the contract for two years, split the 5% distribution automatically between Keys B, C, and D." It completely automates estate planning without requiring lawyers, corporate trustees, or manual technical execution by grieving or displaced family members.

3. Decentralized Execution over Fragmented L2 Space

As we explored earlier, developers are actively attempting to bring this functionality to Bitcoin through upgrades like OP_CAT and frameworks like BitVM.

• However, trying to run a complex time-locked estate directly on Bitcoin L1 right now is incredibly clunky, complex, and restricted. To get smooth programmable logic, you are almost always forced to push your Bitcoin onto an external Layer 2 network or a sidechain. Doing so fragments your security—you are no longer just trusting Bitcoin; you are trusting the specific bridge, sequencers, or a multi-sig committee governing that specific L2.
• ETC provides this out of the box natively on its Layer 1. You don't have to navigate a multi-layered ecosystem, trust a bridge, or worry about moving parts. The underlying execution engine (EVM) and the physical security layer (Proof of Work) are fused into a single monolithic blockchain.

Why this works in 20 years

In this future, ETC has scaled economically rather than technically. It didn't try to compete with the 50,000 TPS speeds of newer chains. Instead, it became the premium, luxury real estate of the crypto world—a heavy-duty digital anchor used exclusively when losing funds is absolutely not an option, and where users gladly pay high base-layer fees ($150) for the unmatched security of immutable Proof of Work.

Summary

Bitcoin is the ultimate asset for storing value, but it functions essentially like a digital gold bar sitting in a safe—it relies entirely on you to protect it and distribute it manually. Ethereum Classic functions like an un-bribable digital vault manager. It takes that same physical Proof of Work security and lets you write immutable, unchangeable rules directly onto the asset itself, ensuring your capital behaves exactly how you intended, across borders, generations, and decades.

Olympia Upgrade — June 2026 Development Checkpoint

Multi-client stability continued through June 2026 LTS codebases. All four Olympia execution clients are stable, peered, and advertising Olympia as the next hardfork on the wire — with Nethermind joining this month as a fourth independent client.

• 🟢 Fukuii v0.8.x — Primary. Multi-EVM architecture — dual Ethereum Classic (PoW) and Ethereum (PoS) execution from a single client. ETH/68 and ETH/69+ on ETC mainnet; ETH/70 wire added for ETH/Sepolia. Scala 3.9 LTS readiness sprint. Purpose-built for ETC — the primary client for the Olympia era. fukuii.com
• 🟠 Core-Geth v1.13.x — Stable, peered, resolves v1.12.x known issues. Final core-geth series before sunsetting, carrying Olympia support through transition. github.com/ethereumclassic/core-geth
• 🔵 Besu v26.5.x — Stable, peered. Upstream ETH/69+ PoW compatibility maintained.
• 🟣 Nethermind v1.39.x — New reference client via ETC overlay. Peered and advertising Olympia.

The Olympia upgrade gives Ethereum Classic the tools to sustain what it's always been — the original, immutable, Proof-of-Work Ethereum. Delivering production-grade infrastructure for miners, mining pools, exchanges, infrastructure providers, institutions, and custody platforms.

Full details: ethereumclassic.com/olympia

What changed since May

• Nethermind added as a fourth independent client via ETC overlay — peered and advertising Olympia, broadening client diversity ahead of activation
• Fukuii ETH/70 wire added for ETH/Sepolia, extending the ETH/68 → ETH/69+ → ETH/70 lineage across both PoW (ETC) and PoS (ETH) sides
• Scala 3.9 LTS readiness sprint — multi-network and modernization refactoring across the Fukuii codebase
• Core-Geth v1.13.0 confirmed as the final series before sunsetting; Olympia support carried through the transition
• Futarchy (ECIP-1117) — continued development on decision-market governance
• Critical security patches, performance hardening, and dependency modernization across the full client stack
• All four clients advertising Olympia as next hardfork on the network (ECIP-1111, ECIP-1112, ECIP-1121)

Working Demo infrastructure — live on Mordor testnet

🏛 olympiatreasury.org — Immutable treasury contract. Deployed and accumulating. (ECIP-1112)

🗳 olympiadao.org — On-chain governance. Proposals, voting, execution — all on-chain. (ECIP-1113, ECIP-1114, ECIP-1119)

Institutional Coordinating Organizations

⚖ ethereumclassicdao.org — Wyoming DAO LLC. Institutional portal for Ethereum Classic — regulatory framework, leadership, coordinating organizations, and the open, permissionless, regulatory-compliant governance architecture for the only Proof-of-Work smart contract platform.

Post-Olympia roadmap

ETC's core software returns to head-of-branch development following the 2024 maintenance period. Alongside full-stack client work, the post-Olympia EL plugin roadmap covers upstream ETC compatibility layers for Go-Ethereum, Nethermind, Erigon, Besu, and Reth — with June's Nethermind overlay an early proof point.

What's next

Continued client hardening and infrastructure modernization. Continued futarchy (ECIP-1117) development. Mordor testnet migration to a post-Olympia environment is in preparation. On track for ETC mainnet activation before 2027.

I've been building a project called Zeus Mail, a wallet-to-wallet communication application deployed on Ethereum Classic.

The idea is simple:

Instead of creating accounts, usernames, passwords, or relying on centralized mail servers, users communicate directly between blockchain wallets.

Every message:

-Is encrypted client-side using AES-256

-Uses SHA-256 key derivation

-Is transmitted using ZEUS tokens as the utility layer

-Pays gas fees to ETC miners

-Is permanently settled on Ethereum Classic's Proof-of-Work network

As AI systems become increasingly powerful, I believe ownership and verification of digital communications become more important.

A message in Zeus Mail is not just data stored on a company server somewhere.

It is:

-Signed by a wallet

-Paid for by the sender

-Confirmed by ETC miners

-Delivered wallet-to-wallet

Current functionality includes:

✓ Wallet Connect

✓ Encrypted Messaging

✓ Inbox / Sent / Archive / Trash

✓ Reply System

✓ Restore Functionality

✓ ZEUS Token Utility Layer

✓ ETC Gas Tracking

✓ React Front-End

✓ Ethereum Classic Smart Contract Backend

One thing I've always admired about Ethereum Classic is its commitment to Proof-of-Work and immutability.

While many chains focus on speculation, ETC feels uniquely positioned to become an application layer for systems where permanence, ownership and verification actually matter.

I'm curious what the ETC community thinks:

1. What use cases would you want to see built on Ethereum Classic?

2. Does wallet-to-wallet communication make sense as a blockchain application in the age of AI?

3. What features would you add next?

Keep a lookout for live launch party on ETCRadio X/Twitter spaces to get hands-on test drive of Zeus Mail.

What are your thoughts on the Ethereum Classic cryptocurrency? Will the Olympia update change the cryptocurrency's valuation, or will the asset continue to decline?

Olympia Upgrade — May 2026 Development Checkpoint

Multi-client stability achieved to May 2026 LTS codebases. All three Olympia execution clients are stable, peered, and advertising Olympia as the next hardfork on the wire.

🟢 Fukuii v0.5.0+ — Multi-EVM architecture implemented. Dual Ethereum Classic (PoW) and Ethereum (PoS) execution from a single client. ETH/68 and ETH/69+ PoW compatibility validated on ETC mainnet. Purpose-built for ETC — the primary client for the Olympia era. fukuii.com

🟠 Core-Geth v1.13.0+ — Stable, peered, carrying Olympia support through transition. Go 1.26+ and 2026 LTS dependencies from previous deprecated codebase. https://github.com/ethereumclassic/core-geth

🔵 Besu v26.5.0+ — Migrated to Besu's May 2026 release. ETH/68 and ETH/69+ PoW compatibility resolved.

What changed since April

• Fukuii now runs as a dual-network execution client — native PoW for ETC and Mordor, Engine API V1-V4 for post-Merge Ethereum via any consensus client (Lighthouse, Prysm, Teku, Lodestar, Nimbus)
• Original ETH/69+ (EIP-7642) chain weight resolution implemented for PoW peer ranking — no upstream equivalent exists. Validated to 0.01% accuracy against ETH/68 wire TD on live ETC mainnet
• Besu's ETH/69+ TD logic for PoW networks identified and resolved — enabling stable multi-client peering across all three clients
• Critical security patches, performance hardening, and dependency modernization across the full client stack
• All three clients now advertising Olympia as next hardfork on the network (ECIP-1111, ECIP-1112, ECIP-1121)
• Olympia Contract layer live Demo v0.2 -> v0.3 deployed on Mordor testnet.

Working Demo v0.3 infrastructure — live on Mordor testnet

🏛 olympiatreasury.org — Immutable treasury contract. Deployed and accumulating. (ECIP-1112)
🗳 olympiadao.org — On-chain governance. Proposals, voting, execution — all on-chain. (ECIP-1113, ECIP-1114, ECIP-1119)

Institutional Coordinating Organizations
⚖ ethereumclassicdao.org — Wyoming DAO LLC. Institutional portal for Ethereum Classic — regulatory framework, leadership, coordinating organizations, and the open, permissionless, regulatory-compliant governance architecture for the only Proof-of-Work smart contract platform.

Post-Olympia roadmap

ETC's core software returns to head-of-branch development following the 2024 maintenance period. In addition to full stack client work, the post-Olympia EL plugin roadmap is in active development via the ETC Cooperative — upstream ETC compatibility layers for Go-Ethereum, Nethermind, Erigon, Besu, and Reth.

What's next

Continued client hardening and critical infrastructure cleanup and modernization. Mordor testnet migration to a post-Olympia environment is in preparation. On track for ETC mainnet activation before 2027.

Full client details: ethereumclassic.com/build/clients

The Olympia upgrade gives Ethereum Classic the tools to sustain what it's always been — the original, immutable, Proof-of-Work Ethereum. Delivering production-grade infrastructure for miners, mining pools, exchanges, infrastructure providers, institutions, and custody platforms.

Most blockchain “messaging” applications today still rely heavily on centralized infrastructure somewhere in the stack.

We wanted to explore what happens when communication itself becomes a native Proof-of-Work blockchain utility.

ZEUS Mail is an experimental wallet-to-wallet encrypted communication layer being developed directly on Ethereum Classic, where:

• Messages are transmitted between wallets on-chain

• ZEUS tokens act as the transmission utility asset

• ETC miners secure and confirm the communication data

• AES-256 / SHA-256 encryption protects the contents before transmission

• Encrypted bytecode is delivered directly to recipient mailboxes through decentralized infrastructure

One of the most interesting aspects while building this has been realizing how ETC’s Proof-of-Work architecture creates a strong foundation for applications where permanence, censorship-resistance and verifiable execution actually matter.

Every message sent:

-generates ETC network activity

-consumes gas fees paid to ETC miners

-increases utility demand for the broader ecosystem

-demonstrates non-financial Proof-of-Work application use cases

The deeper we build, the more Ethereum Classic feels uniquely positioned for:

~secure communication systems

~decentralized AI coordination layers

~asset verification infrastructure

~sovereign identity systems

~tamper-resistant archival storage

~censorship-resistant dApps

There’s also something philosophically powerful about building communication systems on immutable Proof-of-Work rails instead of increasingly centralized infrastructure layers.

I’d genuinely like feedback from the ETC community — especially developers.

What other applications do you think are uniquely suited for Ethereum Classic’s Proof-of-Work security model?

Could ETC become a stronger destination for “hack-resistant” infrastructure-focused dApps as the industry becomes increasingly dependent on AI and autonomous systems?

Olympia Upgrade — April 2026 Checkpoint

The Olympia upgrade is built and entering final testing.

Three execution clients now carry full Olympia support:

🟢 Fukuii — New ETC-native execution client built from the ground up

🟠 Core-Geth — Legacy client, maintenance mode

🔵 Besu — Reference client

All three implement the core Olympia protocol changes:

🟢 EIP-1559 fee market activation — modern transaction pricing for ETC. Instead of burning the base fee like Ethereum, Olympia redirects it into an on-chain treasury funding core development, infrastructure, and security that keep the network functional.

🟢 Immutable Treasury contract — transparent, verifiable, permanent.

🟢 Olympia Hardfork specification — bringing ETC into alignment with Ethereum's Fusaka EVM, closing the execution layer gap and restoring full EVM compatibility.

Miner rewards are fully preserved. The basefee represents a value that was set to be destroyed. All priority fees and tips stay with miners — nothing changes for the people securing the chain.

Working Demo Live on Testnet

The governance layer is operational on Mordor testnet, built on OpenZeppelin's Governor contracts — the same framework securing billions in treasury funds across the EVM ecosystem.

🏛   olympiatreasury.org — Immutable treasury. Deployed and accumulating.

🗳   olympiadao.org — On-chain core development. Proposals, voting, execution — all on-chain.

⚖   ethereumclassicdao.org — Wyoming DAO LLC legal wrapper. Paying open source developers.

What's Next

Testnet validation continues. Activation blocks will be announced once testing is complete.

The Olympia upgrade gives the network the tools to sustain what it's always been — the original, immutable, Proof-of-Work Ethereum.

Hi All
This is a repost since my previous post is filtered. So I just goes quick.
SaturnDEX is a re-born as a fork of Saturn Network. The new DEX went live on Ethereum and Ethereum Classic last month with full platform supported: web dapp, local-host desktop app (linux, wins, macOS)
please take a look at the website and join our discord group for further information.
I hope that this post can find not only new members but also old members from Saturn Network legacy community since we are inactive for so long.
Website: https://saturndex.org/
X: https://x.com/saturndexorg
Discord: https://discord.gg/spWVruAgB5
Github: https://github.com/Saturn-DEX

What do you guys think the future is? Or is there a future? Curious what you guys think, and if this is a good buy or a dying project

Hi ETC community 👋

Over the past year I’ve been building a small experimental Web3 ecosystem on Ethereum Classic, focused on something I think ETC uniquely enables:

immutable applications + proof-of-work security + user self-custody.

Instead of launching another speculative token project, the goal was to explore how ETC can power real user experiences that teach blockchain concepts through interaction.

So I built a few connected applications powered by a ZEUS wallet running on the ETC network.

I’ve just published a detailed guide showing how to configure the wallet using MetaMask + Trezor hardware security, and I wanted to share it here for feedback from the ETC community.

👉 Article: https://medium.com/@zeusproject/configuring-zeus-wallet-on-metamask-trezor-hardware-b32e11af5651

What the ecosystem experiments with

🧩 The Genesis Heist (Web3 Comic)

A digital flipbook comic hosted on-chain that includes a hidden cryptographic puzzle.

First person to solve it wins:

100,000 Satoshis (Bitcoin)

The idea is to teach Bitcoin + Proof-of-Work concepts through storytelling rather than tutorials. Users need 1 ETC to mint comic.

🔐 Zeus Encryption

A simple encryption app using:

• AES encryption
• SHA-256 hashing

Built to explore decentralized identity and secure communication tied to wallet ownership.

🚰 Zeus Faucet

Users can claim 50,000 ZEUS tokens to test transactions and learn ETC interactions without risk.

No paywall — just experimentation.

🔄 DEX Integration (Hebeswap)

ZEUS can be acquired permissionlessly by swapping:

ETC → ZEUS

This keeps everything inside the ETC proof-of-work ecosystem.

Why Ethereum Classic?

I chose ETC specifically because:

• Immutability matters for puzzles and digital artifacts

• Proof-of-Work aligns with Bitcoin security and ETC philosophy

• Predictable rules enable long-term application design

• Minimal governance interference

In an AI-driven future, I believe PoW chains become critical as a trust anchor.

What the guide covers:

• Configuring ZEUS wallet on MetaMask

• Connecting Trezor hardware for self-custody Using ETC native addresses

• Securing assets against common attack vectors

• Getting started with the ecosystem apps

I’d genuinely appreciate feedback from ETC builders and long-time community members.

Especially curious about:

1. What kinds of applications you think ETC should focus on long-term

2. Whether educational/gamified onboarding helps adoption

3. Ideas for improving ETC-based user experiences

Thanks for reading — and thanks to everyone still building on Ethereum Classic ⚡

I dont think etc is coming back.

Has Binance removed the ETH-ETC pair from spot trading?

I had an ETH/ETC grid bot set up, and about a day ago, I logged into Binance to find it had been closed and the ETH and ETC were back in my spot wallet.

When I went to try and set it up again, the trading pair was nowhere to be seen.

Has this happened to anyone else?

and how do you think this would be achieved

One thing this thread nails is that bots aren’t a bug, they’re the baseline and that realization completely changed how we approached building a Pumpfun-style token launch portal on Ethereum for a client who originally thought the goal was to beat bots, when in reality the real problem was designing a system that assumes bots exist and still feels fair and usable for humans. Early prototypes looked great on paper, but in testing, snipers, sandwichers, and volume-faking wallets immediately distorted launches, so we stopped focusing on anti-bot gimmicks and instead redesigned the mechanics: commit-reveal style launches instead of open mempool buys, per-block buy caps tied to unique wallets plus delayed liquidity activation and on-chain signals that surface whether early volume is organic or likely automated. The result wasn’t bot-free (nothing ever is), but it materially changed user behavior: humans could actually participate without instantly becoming exit liquidity and serious projects cared more about sustainable traction than fake charts. I think the bigger takeaway, echoing some comments here is that you either build assuming machines will be your main counterparties or you’re building a museum piece; Pumpfun on Solana works because it embraces that reality rather than pretending retail traders are the dominant force. If anyone is exploring a Pumpfun-like model on Ethereum and wants to sanity-check architecture, economics or bot-resilient launch mechanics, I’m happy to guide you.

We’re days away from shipping a new capability into Proja AI called Proja Chain, and before it goes fully live to Enterprise Plus users, I wanted to pressure-test the positioning with people who actually build and run B2B software.

What we’re releasing is on-chain governance, anchored to Ethereum, but deliberately not crypto-native UX.

At a high level, this introduces:

• Blockchain-verified records

Key governance artefacts (decisions, approvals, change requests, contract versions, milestone acceptances) can be verified on-chain so history can’t be quietly altered later.

• Smart-contract enforced approvals

Multi-party sign-off where records cannot be finalised unless required roles have approved — enforced, not just logged.

• On-chain procurement fairness

Sealed bid tenders where submissions are locked until deadline and provably not accessible early (including by admins).

• Enterprise-grade audit evidence

Exportable proof packs showing when something was approved, by whom, and that it hasn’t changed since.

Important constraints (very intentional):

• No wallets, tokens, or crypto UX

• Users don’t need to “understand blockchain”

• Ethereum is used as a trust anchor, not a product surface

• Aimed squarely at regulated, procurement-heavy, client–supplier environments

This is rolling out as part of an Enterprise Plus tier, not a gimmick feature.

Before release, I’d value honest takes on:

1.  Does on-chain governance actually resonate in enterprise environments, or is this still seen as overkill?

2.  Which of these use cases would materially reduce disputes or audit pain in your experience?

3.  Is anchoring governance to Ethereum a credibility boost — or irrelevant to buyers?

4.  Where do you think adoption friction will come from (legal, behavioural, procurement, IT)?

Not selling anything here — genuinely looking for sharp feedback before this lands in production.

Happy to answer questions at a high level (avoiding internals). Appreciate the collective brainpower.

When we built our ICO on Ethereum, the hardest part honestly wasn’t the smart contract or minting an ERC-20 token, it was navigating trust, legality and expectations in a space already crowded with scams and low-effort launches. Back then, anyone could spin up a token in minutes, publish a rushed whitepaper and raise money, which made investors skeptical by default, so we focused less on launching fast and more on credibility clear token economics, transparent distribution, proper AML/KYC and a real product roadmap that existed beyond a landing page. Platforms that offered ICO-as-a-service helped reduce friction on the technical side, but they didn’t solve the real problem: building confidence and proving you weren’t just another cash grab. What actually worked was treating the ICO like a long-term business, not a fundraising hack shipping early, communicating constantly and aligning incentives so the token had real utility after the sale. If you’re thinking about building something similar today, the tech is easier, but the bar for trust is much higher and I’m happy to guide anyone through the real lessons and pitfalls from experience, if you want to sanity-check your approach before going live.

Read the full report at Focal

Check out today's comprehensive analysis of the cryptocurrency market in our latest report. Here are some highlights:

• Market Leaders: Bitcoin (BTC) tops the list with a market cap of $1.77 trillion, followed by Ethereum (ETH) at $352.93 billion and Solana (SOL) at $71.84 billion.
• Market Sentiment: The Crypto Fear & Greed Index is at an extreme low of 24%, indicating significant fear in the market.
• Price Movements: BTC, ETH, and SOL have seen slight downturns, with Ethereum experiencing the most notable change at -0.05%.
• Institutional Activity: Despite net outflows from spot ETFs, there's growing institutional interest with new ETF filings and hedge fund launches.
• Regulatory Updates: New regulations in the UK and EU aim to enhance transparency and promote institutional adoption.
• Security Alerts: Makina Finance faced a $5 million flash loan attack, highlighting ongoing security challenges in DeFi.

For a deeper dive into these insights and more, read the full report. Let's discuss what this means for the future of crypto! 💬🔍.

Read the full report at Focal

⛽ Technical Discussion: The Death of High Gas Fees.

Data confirms ETH gas is <$0.01 alongside ATH network activity.

Logical Implication: We have officially moved past the "Congestion Phase." The protocol upgrades (Dencun/Pectra era) have successfully optimized data availability. • High Throughput. • Negligible Cost.

The economic barrier to entry for the Ethereum ecosystem is now effectively zero.

We ask this question here at Focal by FalconX every week and we uncover the most promising coins to help you build your investment thesis. We are trusted by insitutional money and we bring the same research now to you.

Read the full report

I’m really not sure how to read these transactions and was wondering if someone could help me. To me it looks like i somehow got $11K? if someone could help that’d be great.

Transaction link - https://etherscan.io/tx/0x2b2b92411c007ad26479e9a36ad8e03e31c4ab9ec8b004406ead888467d1dca1