r/Avatar • u/LegendaryElbappotS • 34m ago
Discussion I think y'all are overreacting
I think a huge huge part of the transition between the first movie and then the second people seem to be ignoring when comparing Jake and Neytiri to their first movie counterpart is that... I think they just straight-up aged. Granted, sure, they seem pretty young still, but I think Jake and Neytiri's faces are only different from age in the second/third films.
I mean... Jake's probably like fifty since he and his brother gained enough prestige in the army that they were sent to the avatar program, so let's call him thirty/thirty-two. By the time the second rolls around his kids are in their teens, in the third, his oldest would have probably been an adult? So I'd argue bro if fifty by the third film. But. By biological clock (we'll say the Avatar was made to be approx the same age by percentage as Jake)
18 years is... you guessed it, 18% of the human life span(let's say 100 is the base "human life span" for convenience) the na'vi are stated to live 30% longer than humans. That means 18 years is about 13.8 percent of the Na'vi lifespan(130 years). So Jake didn't age *as much* as a human would in eighteen years, comparatively like just ten years older than the first movie-ish in a human's lifespan, so really... Jake is more like a fourty year old, he isn't old, he isn't young. For all we know, the Na'vi could prime longer as well. This means generally the bone shapes are still about the same, but the face is still a bit different, but certainly very recognizable.
Though, yes, I will admit, his face looks a little more Jake-like, I just think that there can be two things at once, aging the character, and also just trying to make the Avatar look a little bit more human whether to be more lore accurate or to make it look a little bit more like the actor.