Hi there, the topic on SLS vs MJF seems to be alive again on the industry press.
I was an SLS operator back in the day. I am just wondering if from a technical and part properties perspective the MJF process is superior from every point of view or not.
I understand the caveats of prices, service contracts, material availability etc. that comes with each brand, printer model or even distrubutor/location.
Leaving those aside, I am just looking at process/part property. What's the "scientific" take here?
This all comes from a discussion with another operator but neither of us are proper materials/process experts. Please school us as required.
I understand the following on MJF:
- MJF process uses IR heat rather than laser so fusion is more controlled, hence better part performance
- MJF process with detailing agent marks the part boundaries, hence a bit more precise
- MJF process is the same speed each layer regardless of build density or part geometry
- Claims cooling is faster?
- Most powders are grey and parts look a bit "unfinished"
On SLS:
- Laser induces thermal bleed and local heat accumulation.
- Lasers scan have to travel to "draw" the geometries to be fused, more density build equals longer print times
- There are SLS with grey/black parts as well as white parts, parts may look more well finished.
On SAF:
- Is it just like the MJF process with only one agent for thermal absorbtion? Then the better dimensional accuracy and part properties achieved due to the "detailing agent" of MJF are lost here?
If you have all the money and no preference in brand and the technologies came in the same build volumes, when would one use SLS compared to MJF?
I understand that in the real world pricing, build volumes, machine sizes, powder management etc. all influence the purchasing decision. But if we were to be in a lab just looking at the technology itself how would that conversation go?
Thanks.