When the Third Reich was falling Hitler made clear to his intellectual successors to stress "the law of the rule of the strong" first, and to treat Nazism as a failed vehicle and to focus on pushing the cause of "biosupremacy" the engine which drove if they wished to continue his school of thought. People like Armin Mohler who followed Hitler's instructions stressed that "German nationalism is a failed path and Hitler was weak but ultimately correct" and to follow in pushing the idea of a world ruled by broad "genetically superior elites", removing legal protections preventing their domination as a goal.
These people founded the think tanks that drive alot of the more recent ableist trends and political trends that aim towards removing protections or social security for peoples seen as "inferior and unable to achieve supremacy or assimilate".
When he was coming close to losing the war Hitler made it clear to Speer that Nazis should recognise him as weak and German nationalism as a lost cause but to continue the ideology of biosupremacy. Therefore anyone who uses the label of "Nazi" or "National Socialist" unless you follow him into death when declaring yourself a Nazi is a loser and larper because they are following the failed vehicle and not the driving engine of Hitlerite thought he wanted his successors to continue.
Hitlerites can call themselves anything he said "We might have called ourselves the Liberal Party. We chose to call ourselves the National Socialists... Propaganda must be limited to a very few points and must harp on these in slogans until the last member of the public understands."
There are modern day neo-Nazis who are hateful and driven by grievance and victim complex but the reality is mqny modern day Hitlerite thinkers who are the direct ideological successors of Nazism for this very reason infact do not call themselves Nazis at all because it was a vehicle that crashed. In his logic the vehicle is nothing compared to the core most important points of Hitleritism which must be injected into metapolitics and made more popular or normalised, ableism, elite biosupemacist politics and eugenics. It is not seen as consistent in being a Hitlerite to associate yourself with German nationalism or the Nazi label, plus an "evolutionary disaster if using that failed label and symbol droves away support"?
In Hitleritism the belief system which he stressed made the core of the ideology is that any demographics of people who can't achieve supremacy "stand in the way of evolution" nd do not deserve to exist, stressing assimilationism over respect for diversity.
This is why the Japanese Empire were seen by Hitler as more genetically "superior" than Australian fascists who hoped Australia would receive Germany's protection so Japan does not invade if they came into power.
Orthodox Hitlerism exists today and it is driving alot of ableist thought such as on parts of reddit you see or behind the scenes. It is the greatest threat the world ever faces because they are still onto and trying to achieve the goal Hitler asked for "my real intellectual successors" to continue which is the idea of a world ruled only by the most "biologically superior who assimilate or destroy everyone else", destroy the Pluralism that came with their military defeat and to remove protections stopping this "evolutionary process" in Hitlerite terms.
When you fight against biosupremacist ableists you are fighting the people who Adolf Hitler himself implied to the world before he died are going to be the official successors to the Nazi party today.
