r/PersuasionExperts Dec 29 '24

The Ultimate Book List to Master the Art of Persuasion

104 Upvotes

5 years ago, I wrote a list of the best persuasion books and got a great response.

But since then, I’ve learned a lot and decided to write it from the ground up with better descriptions and new suggestions.

You don't have to read all of them; I believe studying 1 or 2 books is enough.

This list is longer than the original, but for a good reason. I've tried to include unique experiences or concepts of each book to quickly understand what they’re offering.

Now, these are only my recommendations, so I’d love to hear from you.

If a book changed your worldview, solved a painful problem, or helped you build a new skill, please share it in the comments, and I’ll include it in the list.

How to persuade people without being pushy

I have learned the hard way that persuading people by being confrontational or trying to dominate the conversation is a losing game. Even when it works (and rarely does), it leaves you exhausted.

This happens because people resist attempts to persuade them.

But what if you construct the conversation in a way so that they don't realize they are being influenced?

Or better yet, to make them believe your idea is their own idea?

Well, these books will help you do just that.

#1 Pitch Anything by Oren Klaff

Oren Klaff has a reputation for closing high-stakes, multi-million dollar deals. But how does he do it?

His secret is neuroscience. You see, most pitches fail because they overwhelm or bore the audience’s primitive brain.

But Oren makes sure to present the idea in a way that instantly grabs people’s attention, reduces perceived risks, and keeps them hooked. The goal is to bypass logic and connect with people on a primal level because that’s where decisions are actually made.

That's what you'll learn in this book.

You Might Like: Key Lessons from the Book Pitch Anything

#2 Never Split the Difference by Chris Voss

The widespread belief about negotiation or persuading people is to create a win-win situation.

That’s the highest form of achievement in these cases.

Well, Chris sees things differently.

What if you took everything you wanted while making the counterpart believe they got what they wanted?

In other words, why not take 90% or 100% of the pie while leaving your counterpart convinced it was a perfectly fair 50/50 split?

It sounds impossible, but it’s not.

Chris Voss, the former head of the FBI International Negotiation Team, used this same approach in life-or-death situations. And you can use it in everyday situations as well.

You’ll learn to:

  • Understand and use their emotions to gain their trust
  • Focus on the results, and not on compromises
  • Ask calibrated questions that steer the conversation where you want it
  • Use silence as a powerful tool

#3 Human Hacking by Christopher Hadnagy

I’ve been fascinated by social engineers for quite some time. These people manage to break into some of the most secure corporate and government buildings in the world.

We’re talking about places where anyone without proper credentials is questioned or even arrested.

Yet, a skilled social engineer can bypass these defenses, complete their mission, and leave without raising any suspicion.

How do they do it?

They exploit certain psychological vulnerabilities that make us more likely to trust them and follow their lead.

Basically, they have figured out practical ways to hack humans.

Now, Chris Hadnagy is one of the most popular social engineers and has written several books on the subject.

But this one is my favorite.

He explains how the average person can use the same approach to quickly build rapport and influence people, even if they are complete strangers.

#4 The Rape of the Mind by Joost Meerloo

You’ve learned about totalitarian regimes like the Nazis, the Soviet Union, the CCP, and others still in power today.

If you’re reading this, you probably live in a democratic country or at least in a developing one.

Nevertheless, when you learn about the constant mental assault on their citizens to the point that they resemble more robots than humans… You feel grateful for not living under those oppressive regimes.

And you should.

Out of pure luck, you happen to live in the right place, at the right time.

However, that doesn’t mean your mind is safe.

This book will make you realize that the same techniques of brainwashing and menticide are being used on us...

Of course, in a much subtler way - but it’s enough to shape our worldview and live according to the interests of the powerful few.

Dr Meerlo explains in great detail these techniques and what types of people thrive or crumble under their weight.

How to develop more confidence and resilience

No matter how many insights you possess about persuading people, unless you learn how to manage your emotions, you won’t be very effective.

The reason is that people will go out of their way to make your life difficult, and that stress will creep into how you talk to them.

If you come across as angry or nervous, they’ll instinctively see you as pushy or dishonest… even when you’re not lying… even when you have their best interest at heart.

The thing is that most people don’t strive to understand you. They are satisfied with making surface-level assumptions. So you must know how to master your emotions and project confidence despite how chaotic the situation gets.

Plus, we live in a world where people are sensitive AF.

And what happens when you stay cool under pressure?

You immediately stand out. People perceive you as a leader… as someone who can be trusted.

#5 The Social OS

This is not exactly a book, but an advanced course I created.

It contains 4 books that will help you become charismatic and persuasive.

1. How to Become Limitless in Real Life - You learn how to build real focus and discipline, without living like a monk or cutting off from the world.

2. How to Gain Power in the Social World - You'll learn how to build unshakable confidence; how to understand people on a deep level; and how to persuade anyone

3. Psychological Warfare will explain in detail the mindset and tactics of the most manipulative people and how to protect yourself from them.

4. The Charisma Black Book - This is a powerful, unconventional approach to charisma. You'll learn why some people inspire so much devotion in others and how we can do the same.

#6 Can’t Hurt Me and Never Finished by David Goggins

I remember listening to his story on the Joe Rogan podcast and feeling shocked at what he went through, but I was also fascinated by how someone who's been raised in a hellish environment can turn into an unstoppable force.

It’s not an easy read because he explains in detail how his father abused him and his mother, and all the racism he faced growing up. But it's very valuable because it hammers the concept that no matter what happens, we have the potential to survive and thrive.

He also uncovers the entire thinking process behind every obstacle and achievement.

You know, he takes you into a deep exploration of the depths of human nature and shows you that it's not that scary. At least, it's way less scary than the comfort of ignorance.

Now, at the time, I was facing some problems that I could consider existential threats. And he helped me understand and overcome those self-destructive habits.

#8 The Socrates Express by Eric Weiner

When hearing the word philosophy, most people think about some professors arguing about abstract ideas.

Their language might be English, but it might as well be Latin because, under that word salad, very little can be learned.

But here’s the thing: Philosophy was not a battleground for intellectuals. It was practical. It was therapy.

Back then, philosophers were trying to come up with effective ways to deal with daily struggles and find meaning in a meaningless world.

It was self-help before self-help turned into a simple hashtag.

In this book, Eric revives the original purpose of philosophy.

He introduces you to 14 legendary philosophers and their timeless lessons.

How to build a charismatic personality

If you want people to like you and want to be around you, and to confide in you, and to feel withdrawal symptoms if you stay absent from them, then read the following books…

#9 Charisma Myth by Olivia Cabane

Having charisma can open many doors of opportunity for you. It gets easier to build relationships, lead a team, and sell your ideas or products.

Considering the benefits, it’s also easy to think that charisma is a special ability some lucky people are born with.

And there’s some truth in that; some people are naturally magnetic.

But charisma boils down to communicating in a way through your words and body language that attracts people. You know, it’s all about how they perceive you.

So it’s something we can learn, and that’s why I’m recommending this book.

#10 The Code of Trust by Robin Dreeke

Trust is the currency of business and life.

It’s far more valuable than any currency out there.

We buy because we trust the brand.

We keep our money in the bank because we trust they’ll keep it safe.

We elect leaders because we trust they’ll improve our lives.

So, Wu-Tang was wrong – cash does not rule everything around us.

It’s trust that does.

Robin Dreeke is a former FBI agent who spent 20 years catching spies and even recruiting some of them to work for the US government.

He gives a powerful system you can follow to earn people’s trust and build meaningful relationships.

This is a relatively simple book to read, but it’s not easy to apply those techniques. Because it requires doing one thing most people resist… setting aside our ego.

But Robin helps you catch those moments when your ego starts taking over and shows you how to shift your attention back to the other person.

He also gives plenty of examples from his time as an FBI agent and a behavioral analyst.

And just like in The Charisma Myth, for every obstacle you might encounter, you get a clear guide to overcome it.

#11 Deep Work by Cal Newport

This is one of the best books I’ve read on productivity. And it may seem like a weird choice for this category, but hear me out.

Cal teaches you how to develop the mindset to become intensely focused on ONE thing, which can be a task, a conversation, or learning a new skill. This allows you to solve complex problems quickly, but it can also help you become more charismatic and persuasive.

Because you are more attentive, you can notice details in their word choices or body language that can provide clues about who they are and what matters to them. With these insights, you can tailor your communication style to match theirs and connect with them on a deeper level.

Related: The One Persuasion Skill That Changes Everything

In other words, if you read this book and some other book from the charisma or persuasion categories, you can become like Sherlock, but with emotional intelligence.

How to Become a Marketing Rockstar

If you pick one or two books we’ve covered so far and study them – Not read them, but study them. Then you’ll be excellent at selling your ideas or products.

But what if you want to take things to the next level? What if you want to share your vision or sell your products to a large number of people?

For that, you need marketing skills.

Now, marketing can seem overwhelming, but once you master the psychology of selling, everything gets easier. Because, at its core, what is marketing really?

It’s multiplied salesmanship.

#12 $100M Offers and $100M Leads by Alex Hormozi

Most marketing books focus on what big companies are doing to bring in more revenue or improve management.

The problem is that they're not very helpful to new business owners. They don't explain how you can succeed with far fewer resources than your competitors.

That’s when Alex Hormozi comes in. He has extensive experience in growing multiple businesses from scratch, and that is reflected in his books and videos.

Just like Oren Klaff, he emphasizes that framing is everything... How you present yourself and your product matters a lot. For example, instead of fighting to lower the price, you strive to increase its perceived value and keep or increase your profits.

Now, in $100M Offers, Alex gives actionable frameworks to craft offers so good that people feel stupid saying no.

But even an amazing offer will fail if it’s in front of the wrong audience.

So in $100M Leads, he will show you where to find people who are hungry for your product. You'll also learn how to convert them into loyal customers.

#14 Breakthrough Advertising by Eugene Schwartz

Having a superior product is great, but it’s not enough to dominate the market.

We’ve all seen genuinely helpful products fading into obscurity. Meanwhile, there are tons of worthless products raking in millions in sales.

Why does this happen?

Because you cannot create a great product and hope the world will care. You also need to understand and intensify the emotions of your audience.

As Eugene puts it:

“This book is not about building better mousetraps. It is, however, about building larger mice, and then building a terrifying fear of them in your customers.”

In other words, you need to frame your product as the perfect solution to an urgent problem and make people feel the intensity of that problem as if their lives depend on it.

For example, let’s say you’re selling a weight-loss product.

If you present it as a way to look better, you’ll only attract people motivated by vanity, which is a small market.

But if you connect obesity with major fears like heart problems, social rejection, or even loss of opportunities, then you appeal to a much larger audience, and they'll have a higher emotional investment.

The same product. Bigger mice. Stronger fear.

So Eugene teaches you how to:

  • Identify the hidden desires and fears your product solves
  • Turn those vague emotions into specific solutions and calls to action
  • Ethically use fear and urgency to make your product irresistible

This book is out of print, so you need to seek it elsewhere.

How to Become a Strategic Genius

At school, I found history a sleep-inducing subject.

But as I grew up, I started watching documentaries and reading some books, and my view changed.

The subject of history is like a well-written TV series.

You have all sorts of personalities, from saints to sadists.

You have high stakes, betrayal, and a lot of drama.

And it’s all real.

This is why I’ll never understand how schools have managed to make it so mind-numbingly boring.

Now, beyond entertainment, history can teach you a lot about succeeding in the modern world.

You see, centuries come and go, empires rise and fall, and generations of people live and die, but one thing remains the same… Human nature.

We’re still competing for power, resources, and survival, just like people did thousands of years ago.

And whatever you’re facing right now, someone else has figured out how to solve that same problem.

#15 The Essence of War by Ralph D. Sawyer

Military thought is the complex product of both violent war and intellectual analysis.

For centuries, dynasties in China fought viciously for more territory.

This forced them to constantly adapt and innovate.

They combined philosophy, politics, and military strategy to create a complete framework for winning wars efficiently.

For most of history, this knowledge was always in the hands of an elite group of people.

I know, shocking. If you were an ordinary person or even a soldier and possessed these materials, you could be accused of conspiracy.

Initially, these teachings were transmitted orally and passed down in secrecy. But eventually, they were written down in bamboo slips.

In the 1970s, new archeological findings made it possible for the full collection to become accessible to the Chinese public.

Then, in 1993, Ralph Sawyer’s translation of the Seven Military Classics brought these teachings to the rest of the world. I found that book to be overwhelming because there were too many details about the historical context of those materials.

Luckily, Sawyer wrote the Essence of War, where he takes the key concepts of the entire collection and presents them in a leaner, simpler way.

#16 The Definitive Interpretation of Miyamoto Musashi’s Book

Musashi is, without a doubt, the most successful samurai in history.

He fought in over 60 duels and lived to the age of 61.

The secret to his success wasn’t just that he was a gifted and highly disciplined swordsman. He also mastered the art of psychological warfare.

In every fight, Musashi adapted his approach to break the opponent’s confidence before the fight even began.

Close to the end of his life, Musashi reflected deeply on his battles and decided to put those insights into writing.

However, his intention wasn’t simply to document sword-fighting techniques. He explained that these principles could be applied beyond martial arts… to strategy, leadership, and mastering oneself.

I recommend this translation because it simplifies Musashi’s wisdom without losing depth.

While many people might like the original text, I prefer the reinterpretation of his work. As you may have noticed from this list, I’m not a fan of books with complex language.

#17 The 33 Strategies of War by Robert Greene

This book is very similar to The Socrates Express.

Both authors have studied some of the greatest minds and distilled their wisdom into actionable lessons.

While Eric helps you deal with life’s toughest questions, Robert dives into the raw reality of life’s battles.

He draws on strategies of generals, political figures, and artists to give you 33 timeless lessons for outsmarting your rivals.

Thankfully, most of us will never participate in a war, but everyday life sure feels like one. But by improving your strategic thinking, you can make better decisions and gain the upper hand in tough situations.

If Eric asks, How should we live? Robert asks, How do we win?

In other words, he gives you a manual for winning battles you didn’t choose but cannot afford to lose.

#18 The Prince by Machiavelli

If you have an idealistic view of the world…

If you go out of your way to help anyone…

If you would never hurt a fly…

Then this book goes against everything you believe, but you must read it.

Niccolò Machiavelli doesn’t care about how the world should be but how it is.

He forces you to confront two harsh realities:

First, powerful people play by different rules. They understand the mechanics of the social world and are willing to do whatever it takes to achieve their goals.

Second, people are ungrateful, fake, and driven by self-interest.

This doesn’t mean they’re selfish all the time. Under the right circumstances, they can be generous and even self-sacrificing. And those who preach morality the loudest are often the first to abandon it when gaining some power.

In addition, Machiavelli doesn’t suggest being cruel just for the sake of it, nor does he reject doing good.

Instead, he argues that gaining and maintaining power should be your top priority. Without it, your ideals mean nothing.

At the same time, you need to acknowledge the role of Fortuna (luck or chance), which can disrupt even the best plans.

Now, I don’t fully subscribe to the idea of being outright selfish. Living only for yourself is a lonely and miserable existence. You must find and fight for a bigger purpose… something much bigger than yourself.

But I do believe that being weak doesn’t make you virtuous. True virtue is about being powerful and choosing to use it for good.

So you can’t gain power, much less use it for good, unless you truly understand the game and outsmart those who are willing to play dirty.

That’s why you need to study The Prince.

More Amazing Books:

Thank you very much for reading.

It’s been a long and hopefully helpful read.

If you have more book suggestions, please let me know in the comments, and I’ll include them in a special section of this list.

Disclaimer: If you buy from the Amazon links, I get a small commission. It helps me write more.

I don't promote books that I haven't read and found helpful.


r/PersuasionExperts 4d ago

Dark Psychology This World Cup Final is Absolute Cinema

7 Upvotes

Even if you are not a football fan, you must watch this final because it is cinematic as fuck.

You’re not just watching some sports game but the series finale of a ruthless HBO or Netflix drama.

In my previous article, I told you a story of a tormented genius who dragged himself through the mud to finally achieve his dream.

It was a show of primal desperation of Messi clashing with the primal desire of Mbappe to be the first.

You know, their fight reminds me of the final scene of Squid Game.

You have two men, mercilessly cutting and biting each other, knowing fully well that only one of them will walk away breathing... and only one of them will take the ultimate prize.

But this final is different because Messi is not the hero.

He is now a greedy emperor who refuses to retire and is ready to scourge the earth to cement his immortality. 

And the only challenger left is Lamine Yamal - A young prodigy who was also trained at La Masia academy and, strangely, was bathed by Messi when he was a baby.

Before we go there, though, let’s rewind the tape to the day Messi’s empire almost crumbled.

The Ruthless Prince

For years, Messi was fighting to offload the suffocating weight of Maradona. 

Since he was a young player, Argentinians have told him that 'Yes, you are great, but you're not Maradona because you have never won the World Cup '.

And here we are in the World Cup final [2022]. 

Messi is one step away from victory. 

But standing in his way is Kylian Mbappé - a ruthless prince at the height of his power.

The internet calls him a dictator; I call him Freddie Krueger.

I say this because Argentina was winning comfortably. They were leading by two goals and were just 15 minutes away from getting crowned.

But what was supposed to be a beautiful ending turned into a literal nightmare because Kylian Krueger scored 3 fucking goals. Who scores a hat trick in a World Cup final?

To say that Mbappé was lethal is an understatement.

In the span of a single game, he posed a more serious threat to Messi's legacy than Ronaldo ever managed across their lifelong rivalry.

However, Argentina bled on the field, and honestly, they also had luck on their side. It's as if the Gods of football wanted Messi to win. 

Maybe they were helping their son. 

Sorry, sorry, let’s not get blasphemous.

Now in politics, at some point, you will need to forge your own path, and in order to do so, you need to kill your political father. The same thing happens in football.

By lifting that trophy, our tormented genius fulfilled his life's mission and finally surpassed Maradona. 

More crucially, you can argue all day long, but statistically speaking, he's the GOAT.

He closed football.

Period.

The Undisputed Emperor

One year later, Messi retired from professional football and went on to play in the MLS. 

They even brought in Jordi Alba, Suarez, and Busquets to form a mini-Barcelona in Miami.

The public believed he was going to sit back and chill, staring out with a serene look like Thanos did after the snap.

And given the league's level, he could easily have played until the age of 45.

But apparently, he didn't want to retire without securing the Triple Crown, and it was clear that he was not alone in this quest...

His disciples maintained the same insatiable hunger for titles.

They are bound together by a quasi-religious, almost cultish devotion to their captain.

So it's 2024, and they are playing Colombia in the Copa América final.

By the middle of the game, Messi suffers a nasty ankle injury. There's no way he can continue. He’s so devastated that he’s sobbing on the bench.

Later, Scaloni explained that Messi broke down because he felt like he had abandoned his teammates in the middle of the war.

You would think that losing the captain would weaken the squad, but NO… They fought with even more ferocity.

Lautaro Martinez scored in extra time, and he celebrated by running to the bench to hug Messi.

So now they have the Triple Crown: the 2021 Copa América, the 2022 World Cup, and the 2024 Copa América.

There is only one other team that has achieved this insane level of excellence... Spain.

They won the Euro 2008, the 2010 World Cup, and Euro 2012.

Now the biggest star of Spain is, without a doubt, Lamine Yamal. 

But sometimes history plays cruel jokes.

When Yamal was a baby, his family won a raffle to have a photo taken with a Barcelona player. Out of pure coincidence, they were paired with a 19-year-old Messi.

And here we are, 19 years later...

Yamal will face Messi in the final, and as we said earlier, if he wants to forge a new path for himself, he must kill his football father.

On the other hand, Messi will show no mercy.

He wants to cement his immortality in sports, and if needed, he’s going to step onto this young cub.

Destiny or Destruction

The mountain Yamal has to climb is as big as they come.

Will he be able to stop Messi, or will he become just another rival that got consumed by the Argentinian Kronos?

As we explained, in the last final, Messi was the hero.

We all wanted him to win for the sake of football... or if you are a fan, for the sake of our sanity.

But this time Messi is no hero. He's no Batman crawling out of the pit. He's no Simba trying to regain his kingdom. He's actually Scar.

Hear me out...

Yamal is the literal representation of the newborn prince. Just like Messi, he was trained at La Masia and is the new prodigy, the new superstar of Barcelona.

If he wins tomorrow, he will automatically overthrow the emperor and start his own reign. 

He will then have to face the likes of Mbappé, Vinícius, and Bellingham while striving to break Messi's crazy records.

So we will see the old generation retiring while the new generation continues the fight for who's the best. It's the circle of life, right?

However, since he was a kid, Messi has shown that there's nothing ordinary about him, so why would he accept an ordinary transfer of power?

And since life is not a Disney movie where the hero always wins, this raises the uncomfortable question... 

What if Messi wins tomorrow?

Because here’s where we stand. Right now, he has these crazy stats:

  • 46 Trophies
  • 8 Ballon D'Ors [record]
  • 91 Goals for a single year [record]
  • 418 Assists [record]
  • 1 World Cup

If he wins tomorrow, he will have 2 World Cups back-to-back, which is an insane achievement in itself. And when we add those other records, then he would essentially set an impossible standard to reach.

Sure, future generations of players will fight for fame and glory, but the best they can achieve is second place. No one will be able to surpass him.

That's why I don't see Messi as a hero.

I see him as a mad emperor who will fight till the last breath to not only keep his throne, but also scourge the earth so nothing ever grows after him.

Considering all of this, I'm still rooting for him.

Now, eventually, they are going to make a movie based on his life.

But what do you think? Wouldn't this be a great movie? 

In the first part, you have the wounded genius achieving his goal in the most dramatic way possible. 

In the second part, we see our hero transform into an insatiable behemoth. 

The only challenger left is the young prodigy… Lamine Yamal.

So regardless of the outcome tomorrow, the final is going to be absolute cinema.


r/PersuasionExperts 7d ago

Dark Psychology Why Teammates Are Willing To Die For Messi

45 Upvotes

The Argentinians burned Messi's jerseys in the streets. They vandalized his statue in Buenos Aires.

They called him a traitor because he fought more fiercely for Barcelona than for his own national team.

They were livid because their team had lost 3 consecutive finals, and according to them, the culprit was always... Messi.

They were so toxic, so relentless in their attacks that they actually forced the greatest player on earth to publicly quit the national team in 2016. 

That very same day... a young kid named Enzo Fernandez wrote a desperate plea on Facebook for him to come back. He signed off with: "Thank you and forgive us".

Now this simple post gives us a glimpse of the mentality of…

The New Generation of Players

Apart from Fernandez, other future stars like Alvarez, Martinez, Martinez, Martinez, and Allister grew up idolizing Messi.

They watched him bleed for a country that spat on his face every time they lost. It fueled a fire in their hearts to one day play next to him and help him win. And once they were on the same grass as him, what did they do?

They protected him at all costs.

The strategy was for Messi to stay idle for many minutes. During this time, he's scanning the opponent for potential flaws. Then, once he has figured it out, he will give an assist or score a goal. Often, it feels like it came out of nowhere because Messi sees the field differently.

Now Messi is a magician on the field, but he’s very shy.

His teammates would get intimidated by him. He's their idol. He's wayy above them. But Rodrigo De Paul changed it. He used to drag Messi out for a drink with the boys and force the squad to stop treating him like a deity.

De Paul also became his unofficial bodyguard. If an opponent so much as breathed too hard on Messi, he was instantly in their face, ready to tear them apart. 

Maybe I'm wrong, but this generation of players seems to be more devoted to Messi than to the national shirt.

Yes, for every football player, winning the World Cup is the biggest achievement; It’s a lifelong dream, but for those players it was more than that. 

It was a blood oath. It was a life mission to help Messi be crowned as the GOAT.

But before they could conquer the world, they had to break a suffocating, 28-year curse. 

For 28 agonizing years, Argentina hadn't won a single major trophy.

And that puts us in the pressure cooker of...

The 2021 Copa America Final

Argentinians are about to step onto the grass of the Maracana Stadium in Brazil.

This is the stadium where they suffered the most gut-wrenching defeat of their lives... When Germany defeated them in extra time in the WC final in 2014.

There's a great photo of Messi staring blankly at the trophy. That image became the defining symbol of failure.

As if fighting that ghost of the past wasn't enough, they are playing against Brazil.

Argentina vs Brazil is the clash between two countries that fanatically love football and hate each other with a religious zeal, as if they were from the Balkans.

You can imagine that the tension must have been so thick they could taste it.

Messi understood the psychological weight, and that's why he gave a speech focusing on the fact that they made big sacrifices and that it's a sign from God that they are playing at the Maracanã stadium... that they're meant to win precisely here...

"45 days without seeing our families, boys... Dibu [Emiliano Martínez] became a dad, and he still hasn't seen his daughter or been able to hold her in his arms. And why? For this moment. Because we had a goal, and we are one little step away from achieving it."

They marched out and won the Copa America.

But the ultimate test was still waiting for them at...

The 2022 World Cup

I want to give him my life; I want to die for him

- Emiliano Martínez

As I’ve explained in my course, people who inspire devotion unknowingly embody certain archetypes and are part of a large story.

In this case, Messi embodies the hero archetype and is part of the story of becoming the greatest player of all time.

He was always the best at club level. That was undisputed despite the rivalry with Ronaldo.

In my view, that rivalry is more about marketing than actual football performance.

But Messi was traumatized by those three consecutive final losses, and as we said, the Argentinian fans were ruthless.

A quick side note here: I understand the fans' anger, but I believe they actually set the team back by putting overwhelming, unnecessary pressure on each player.

Yes, they are superstars, but they are human after all.

For example, Di Maria had to go to therapy and still takes anti-anxiety meds to this day because of the bullying.

However, he had an iron will and tremendous loyalty to the team, which helped him go the distance in every final... and he scored in 4 major finals. This is an incredibly difficult record to break.

Now, I’m just a fan from the other side of the world who has been following Messi closely since 2010.

I’ve had the luck to witness a goal that was almost impossible to score - scientifically speaking.

I’ve had the good fortune to witness Barcelona turn the result around against PSG, which remains one of the most insane games ever.

I’ve had the luck to witness Real Madrid being constantly humiliated.

But I knew, and all the Messi fans around the world knew, even though we refused to admit it or say it out loud…

He would never be the GOAT without Copa America and especially without winning the World Cup.

There’s no doubt that WC is the holy grail of sports. Not just of football, but of sports.

But Messi was getting older. 

We all knew that if they failed in 2022, everything would be OVER for him.

Messi scored in the final against France. Di Maria also scored. We were all ecstatic because they were comfortably leading and about 15 minutes away from the end of the game.

However, as you may have noticed in this WC [Argentina vs Egypt, for example], you must never let up until the final whistle, because the situation can change really quickly.

What seemed like an easy win… what seemed like the beautiful end… was just the beginning of a nightmare.

It’s Mbappe. 

It’s always the fucking Mbappe. 

Redditors call him a dictator now, but he is more like Freddie Krugger.

WTF! WTF!

That mf scored 2 quick goals, and now the earth was shattering below our feet.

In the last seconds of extra time, the French player Muani has the chance to end everything, but Martinez makes a MIRACULOUS SAVE.

Thanks to him, the game went into a penalty shootout.

Honestly, I couldn’t bear to look at it because these penalty shootouts are like Russian roulette.

I went for a walk, but then the curiosity got the better of me, so I stopped in front of a bar. 

Montiel is about to shoot. 

If he scores, the nightmare is over.

He does. He delivers a flawless goal.

I shouted like a madman. 

Interestingly, most of the people in the bar were supporters of France. But I didn’t care because, as a fan, I knew that this goal closed the biggest debate in football.

Messi is the undisputed GOAT.

It will take many many years, perhaps decades, for the next player to claim this title.

This year Argentina is not at the same level it used to be, but there’s a chance that they could win again.

If they defeat Spain, then Messi will set an impossible record.... You know, considering all the titles of Messi + 2 back-to-back WC titles... It will take a century or more to have another player like him.


r/PersuasionExperts 7d ago

England Made a Vital Mistake

4 Upvotes

I was watching the game with my father and I saw in the second half that England is following the "parking the bus" strategy. This means that you bring all the players back in defense trying to maintain that one goal advantage.

But then I told him that it’s not going to work. They are going to crack. Messi has a lot of experience with this kind of defense when he played for Barcelona.

Argentina is used to being at a disadvantage and then changing everything up the last 15 minutes.

Honestly, I wasn't fully sure in my analysis; I was more trying to keep myself calm but after Argentina scored, I knew it was over.

Because even if they go extra time this was a massive psychological blow for England.

When you are winning for most of the game and suddenly, they tie then it's very difficult to recover.

Say what you want about Argentina; I know that they have become the villain of this world cup but they have heart.

They win because football is not just about tactics; It’s about fighting till the last second. It’s about being willing to die on the field. It’s about wanting to win more than being scared of losing.

You don’t have the luxury of doubting yourself because you're facing the relentless pressure from the GOAT.

I mean Messi is constantly scanning your defense. He might find some space that you never would’ve thought of and you’re fucked. It literally takes a couple of seconds for your entire plans to go to sh*t.

As I predicted in my previous article, Argentina will face Spain in the final.

Fortunately, the last night's game didn't go to extra time so they will be able to have more rest.

Spain is clearly the favorite team to win but Scaloni has this scary ability to adapt to the game and we will see if they're willing to bleed for the trophy the same way the argentinians are.

I’m biased because I’m a fan, but I believe that Argentina will be crowned champion once again.

How To Learn So Fast It's Almost Unfair

Why Teammates Are Willing To Die For Messi


r/PersuasionExperts 12d ago

Dark Psychology Kanye West's Concert Has Failed...

29 Upvotes

Kanye West will perform in Tirana, Albania.

But the real show isn't on the stage.

It's the spectacular panic of a desperate government.

A couple of days ago, the government took $4.5 million out of emergency funds to quietly buy up all the unsold tickets.

Leaked messages show that they are asking government employees and other supporters of the socialist party to bring their friends and relatives.

According to this article, employees will be forced to go, and the ticket price will be deducted from their salaries.

Don't get me wrong. Albanians are not canceling Kanye West. He's just collateral damage.

This is about 41 days of relentless protests that have outsmarted Edi Rama's propaganda machine.

So he and his cronies have been frantically promoting this concert.

Their goal was to distract people from the protests and to send a message to foreigners that he's a cool prime minister.

What was supposed to be a shiny distraction has turned into a nightmare.

Comment sections across social media are filled with criticism...

"The hospitals lack basic medicine and equipment, yet they're spending millions on a 1-day concert."

What's even more absurd is the fact that for a month, Rama has been accusing the protesters of being anti-semitic.

Yet he sponsors a rapper who literally dedicated a song to the painter.

The empty seats are just a fraction of the battle.

On top of marching in the streets every single day, the protesters have initiated a campaign to hurt the wallets of oligarchs.

We are choosing not to buy in certain big supermarkets and gas stations.

We've also posted tens of thousands of negative reviews on the businesses of Rama's friends.

And right from the start, we have boycotted the artists who are also connected to the government.

The idea is that you cannot support an autocrat and expect us to support you.

How did they respond?

The director of police declared that anyone who leaves negative reviews will be brought to justice.

The protesters were so shocked by this threat that they decided to withdraw. It's too much of a risk.

I'm kidding.

We are more pissed off than ever.

The way they've been reacting to the protests is the same playbook as what the communist regime did - character assassination, constant ridicule, and constant threats.

Tomorrow is Kanye West's concert, and it also marks the 42nd day of protests.

Rama manufactured a fake crowd... Thousands of hostages forced to smile and clap.

But he will see what a real crowd looks like.

UPDATE:

There are 35,000 unsold tickets.

Then, suddenly, the government spends $4.5 million on the concert.

A half-empty stadium is terrible optics.

The government has failed to sell the tickets, so it gave them away for free to its supporters.

Government employees are forced to attend the concert.

We know this from leaked messages on social media.

There's an accusation that the ticket price will be deducted from their salaries.

This is not confirmed.

However, I wouldn't be surprised because government employees are treated as servants of the party.

They have to like and share the social media posts of the party officials.

They have to attend meetings whenever a party official comes to town.

They have to vote for the party. Their families also have to vote for the party; otherwise, they will be fired.

Related: Did the Albanian Ruler CON Trump's Family?


r/PersuasionExperts 12d ago

F19 How I can make someone do something for me ?

2 Upvotes

So I have lost u can say my offer letter to college , and it had details of what kind of documents to bring on 30th of this month .i already msg the support lady to ask the details of the document but she said to just check the offer lettree , mind u the offer letter was given in physical form and is already been lost 😀, so I called her , do u mind telling me what kind of documents u will be needed ! Her: u can check the offer letter but yeah u need blah blah blah , she told me althought some of it but I am sure am missing some , and also wondering. Do we need that offer letter on that day , now am embarassed to call and ask and tell her I lost it , how can I explain her the situation, btw before msging her I started pulling my hair , beat myself phsycially, hate life . So help me 😘 and yeah I got anxiety and confidence issue


r/PersuasionExperts 16d ago

Dark Psychology Socialism is the Kryptonite of American Left

0 Upvotes

I have been following US politics for years, and frankly, it is painful to watch the left repeatedly shoot itself in the foot. 

If they actually became more pragmatic, they would become insanely powerful.

I know they have many brilliant minds, but I’m giving my two cents on the matter. 

As always, I'm open to debating in the comment section. 

THE BASICS

We can get into academic debates all day long, but Americans (just like the rest of the world) primarily want three simple things: 

A decent roof over their heads, a doctor who won't bankrupt them, and schools that don't churn out idiots.

The problem is that the Red Scare and the propaganda of the right have branded these boring necessities as “communist”.

Obviously, they are wrong. Look at Germany, Switzerland, or the Nordic countries.

They help their people, and last time I checked, they aren't living in gulags. 

Now, if you believe in capitalism but also demand those vital services, you are a social democrat.

You are NOT a socialist because they don’t believe in capitalism.

I bring this up because Democrats constantly let themselves get slapped with the "socialist" label.

If you stop getting tangled in senseless ideological debates, then you will be closer to the people.

Because people don’t want the abolishment of capitalism, and for sure they don't want totalitarianism

THE OTHER SIDE

Actually, even if you are on the right, you should push for high-quality and affordable healthcare, education, or housing. 

Think about it.

If you want to have a booming economy, you need hard-working, smart people.

Well, how can you have a booming economy if people are uneducated? Or if they’re super stressed about health!

If people felt safer, they could be more willing to take risks.

  • They could quit that dull job to start a business.
  • They could switch work more easily and go where they feel valued.

Right now, you don’t have people who are incentivized to be innovative.

Instead, you have millions and millions who are scared and depressed. 

This undoubtedly affects the economy because they are less productive than they could be.

They go to work, but they do just enough not to get fired.

The irony is that you’re building a workforce similar to what the Soviets had.

Under actual communism, people would get blatantly exploited with nowhere to turn.

Where are you going to complain? To the Party? Lol. 

However, they realized that they could do the bare minimum. 

They were like: “They pretend to pay us; we pretend to work”.

So if the right actually wants a stronger economy, they have to eliminate the fear of medical bankruptcy and homelessness. 

The enemy of  your enemy is NOT your friend

Here is a bizarre, almost suicidal habit the far left cannot stop doing:

Painting America's enemies as the heroes.

Look, I get that most Americans - regardless of their political views - are against wars.

And who can blame them? Nobody wants a repeat of Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan. 

But do they have to grab pom-poms and cheer for Iran? Or frame dictators like Gaddafi as the good guys!! 

I’m not only talking about the fringe, far-left groups.

Since the war, this framing has become increasingly prevalent on major TV stations as well. 

They have invited Iran’s representatives to talk without any pushback from the host.

And it's clear that the left media have often overlooked their crimes.

This puts you all in a very weak position - even the social democrats.

Because the other side can simply bring up the crimes of the Islamic Regime, and suddenly you slip into becoming the advocate for a bunch of maniacs.

THE RECIPE

This is an interesting case study of how a leftist politician can succeed.

If you’ve read my previous articles, sorry for being repetitive.

Albin Kurti is the PM of Kosovo.

He is a social democrat who dominates in a very conservative, right-leaning country.

Heck, he even has a rabid base of supporters outside the borders.

How the fuck did he pull that off?

Simple. 

He understands his people.

He knows that for a small country, sovereignty is a massive issue.

That’s why, since he was merely an activist, he was the most aggressive bulldog on the issue of national sovereignty.

He also created a clear division between the corrupt elite [old politicians + media + oligarchs] and everyone else. 

People didn’t really see his suggestions as “left” or “right” but as logical solutions.

Words are not enough. You also need credibility and consistency. 

He has credibility because he has never been involved in corruption scandals.

So he wins voters from the left by bashing the elite and promising social services, while simultaneously stealing voters from the right by being a hardcore watchdog for the nation.

The Delusion Infecting the Left

I know that Redditors love to flirt with this trend, but it’s time to end it. 

You must fight the trend of presenting the Iranian Regime as the good guys or “not as bad”.

Look, despite how despicable Trump is, you must never, ever allow your side to root for the enemy.

USA is a country with deep, patriotic pride.

Even if most of the country is against the war, they cannot be so cavalier about their fellow Americans hoping the US will lose.

You might say that they’re not being logical about patriotism, socialism, foreign policy, and the military… and perhaps you are right. 

But in politics, people do not make complex calculations.

They operate on emotion and instinct.

One day, Trump will retire, the media will find new villains and heroes, but the average citizens will still have resentment. 

If the Republicans don’t find a way to win the war, they will be destroyed in the midterms, setting the stage for a 2028 loss.

However, remember this:

Once Trump leaves, it won’t be the end of your problems. 

Future opponents will attack you incredibly hard, specifically on your stance towards Iran. 

You will point your finger at Trump’s incompetence, but it won’t work because again… 

Masses do not make complex calculations.

They won’t remember the details of the war, but they will remember that a chunk of the left was rooting for the country to lose.

Trump is very charismatic and knows how to speak to Americans. But he's old; speaks all sorts of idiotic things and WORSE... He's in the Epstein Files.

But what if, in the future, you get a leader who has the same insights on the American mind and is willing to constantly go into enemy territory?

So the social democrats need to step it up and find a leader like this; otherwise, the other side might have it.

UPDATE:

In this article, I explained that the masses do not make complex calculations but react on instinct and emotion.

Interestingly, you are seeing it live. Instead of acknowledging the left's flaws, some Redditors just brush them off.

They cannot even find the words to defend the old approach.

Guys, do you find it concerning that a walking disaster like Trump defeated democrats TWICE?

And if they lost to a leader who constantly makes autogoals, what happens when you have an opponent who hits people on a visceral level and is free of controversy?

Don't you think it's time to reflect?


r/PersuasionExperts 19d ago

Dark Psychology The Psychology of Revolution

17 Upvotes

Authoritarian leaders have been gaining power not only in former communist countries but also deep in the heart of the West. 

But why would an entire population, even those who are forged by Western values, willingly accept being oppressed? 

Because it doesn't look like oppression. 

It looks like "This is how it's always been".  

However, when you least expect it, people might rise up and face the autocrat head-on. 

That can be puzzling. How can a broken country do this? 

It seems crazy. You would have to be a Walt Disney-level optimist. 

Well, the impossible happens. Rarely, but it does.

Let's look at Albania - A completely broken country is currently undergoing a once-in-a-lifetime revolution.

What is going on there is the blueprint for destroying a sophisticated propaganda machine.

ABYSS

Albanians are known for many things, but not for a culture of protesting. 

This comes from a history of oppression. For 50 years, we lived in a literal North Korea; we went into a civil war shortly after communism fell, and then, 4 protesters were killed by the government in 2011.

But our "intellectuals" who give their opinions in the media never considered this. They simply ridiculed the people.

They told them that they are powerless; they deserve it; that they are spineless; that they should leave the country because it will never get better, etc.

They thought of shaming people into action, but I have honestly ALWAYS been against this approach. 

I have always suspected they are paid by the regime, and some definitely are, but most of them are just ignorant of what they are doing.

Why does shaming people never work?

Because an oppressed population is like a depressed person. 

You cannot scream at them as if you were in a military boot camp.

I mean, a new recruit has a clear goal, expects all sorts of hardships, and is surrounded by other tough people.

Whereas an oppressed population is in a foreign environment.

They cannot trust their neighbors; They cannot trust the media figures; they cannot trust themselves.

They believe they are among the few who are awake, yet everyone else agrees with the corruption, crime, and weekly scandals.

Related: How to Radicalize a Normie

They think: “Things will never get better. Maybe I should just leave this godforsaken country.”

And they did. 

Over 450,000 Albanians have migrated to the West since Edi Rama became prime minister.

The media [which is entirely owned by Rama btw] used to say:

“They are voting with their feet.” 

It’s clever, isn’t it? 

They are voting with their feet.

I strongly, strongly disagree.

They didn’t vote shit. 

They simply left for a better life.

In doing so, they left the entire country in the hands of Rama and his moronic followers.

Now you have three major groups.

I have ranked them by size:

  • Apathetic
  • Sheep
  • Idealists

The idealists and apathetic look at the situation as it is.

They understand that the country is royally fucked.

But both of them fall prey to propaganda.

Yes, they do.

Propaganda is not only for the sheep.

The idealists start to think they are the only ones who are awake and often turn into vicious cynics. (The most famous example is George Carlin)

The Apathetic are the majority of the population, but they don't know it.

Since the media is dominated by the opinions of the sheep, they think that they are outnumbered.

They tend to get demoralized easily, and they are the ones who leave the country.

The apathetic and the idealists usually comprise the middle class.

They feel isolated.

And as you can see, it's all by design.

Historically speaking, it is the middle class that tends to start a revolution.

But if it is shrunk by economic hardships and immigration, then it's incredibly difficult to get organized.

If you live in the West, I hope you now understand why the middle class gets attacked without mercy.

Then one sunny day, this population of seemingly spineless people just snaps.

THE TRIGGER

Everything started with a fake AI image.

The land where Jared Kushner's resort will be built has a massive barbed-wire fence. 

In it, there is a sign marking the Albanian-Israeli border.

An image is worth a thousand words, right? 

Well, this image was worth a whole narrative... one about being colonized.

To be fair, there is no proof that Israelis were involved, and the investment money comes from Arab billionaires.

I used to jokingly say that if Arabs are using their money to help Israelis buy land, then the world is really ending.

Nevertheless, I was glad that this image went viral.

Because even though it's only a conspiracy theory, it can mobilize a lot of people. 

THE SILVER BULLET

A small protest was organized in that village against the project.

A few hours later, a private security guard hits one of the protesters in the face and starts dragging him for about 20 meters or more.

Meanwhile, the police officers are doing NOTHING. 

They are just standing there.

Once I saw the video, I was super angry, but I also knew full well that this had changed everything. 

We finally had a chance to save the island that Ivanka Trump discovered.

Now, for years, we have suspected that if we were in danger, the police and the government would do nothing. 

And there they are. Just standing there as one of us is being dragged away in the mud.

We all saw ourselves in that person.

The very next day marked the beginning of massive protests in Tirana, and we are still going strong every single day.

Why did it happen?

Rampant corruption, selling of our lands, and the violence that day... Triggered an ancient framework deep in our subconscious.

Yes, we often pick authoritarian leaders. For the last 86 years, Albania has been a factory for mediocre politicians. 

We have tolerated them because we are very ignorant about internal threats.

But once we began to see the prime minister as a traitor who's selling our lands, that’s when we flipped into war mode.

Because historically speaking, we have faced some really powerful enemies… The Roman Empire, the Slavs, the Ottoman Empire, the Fascists, the Nazis, and the Communists.

We are extremely sensitive when land is involved.

We can tolerate authoritarian leaders but never invaders.

It was very interesting to witness an apathetic population turn into beasts fighting for their country.

Now, every country has its own trigger. 

It can endure a lot of oppression, but then out of the blue, as if a switch has flipped on, the masses suddenly wake up.

It can seem random, but it's not.

It's not a simple protest. 

You can notice the difference by the way ordinary people talk. 

It’s like they have gotten incredibly wiser. They operate like ants - in the sense that they know what to do without having a leader to organize them.

So everything depends on finding the silver bullet... a narrative that can hit the population on a visceral level... something that triggers the deep, underground oceanic currents in the nation's subconscious.

Once that happens, you have a revolution.

You might also like:

Know This, and You'll Never Be Brainwashed Again


r/PersuasionExperts Jun 20 '26

Dark Psychology Know This, and You'll Never Be Brainwashed Again

90 Upvotes

Since kindergarten, we were conditioned to sit down, shut up, and memorize a script.

We were taught to be obedient workers who never question the narrative.

And for good reason.

If the masses ever snapped out of their trance, the people running this clown show would lose all their power by Tuesday.

Now this isn't some militant manifesto. I know that we cannot change the world, but we can change ourselves. We can at least learn how to stop falling for their propaganda like a bunch of sheep.

To do that, we need to understand our true enemy.

It's not only the top 1%... It's not just Trump, Putin, Jinping, Bezos, or Larry Fink... It’s the shadow players who ensure the wealthy get to keep their power.

I call them

The Gifted Machiavellians

These guys are much more dangerous than drug dealers and rotten politicians combined.

Don't believe me?

  • How do you convince an entire nation to try to annihilate another population?
  • How do you trick millions of people into burying themselves in debt or consuming incredibly toxic products?
  • How do you get neighbors to hate each other just because they vote or pray differently?

There are countless more examples of how these master manipulators have pushed us to live like sh*t or fight each other like animals in a pit.

The good news is that they all follow the same playbook.

Honestly, it's not that complicated, so here we will go through it page by page.

Ok, the first rule of propaganda is...

It Must Not Look Like Propaganda

In the 80s, the producers of Top Gun made a deal with the US military. They could use the planes and the airfields, but they always needed to portray the soldiers in a positive light.

You have this cool pilot who has it all. A fast jet, hot girls, a motorcycle, a fast life... anything that young men secretly crave.

It didn't look like a recruitment ad, but it turned into a superb recruitment tool that continues to this day.

Thanks to this franchise, hundreds of thousands of young men joined the Navy.

DOD cooperates with Hollywood because we will gladly accept their hidden narratives - even pay for them.

Another example is Brooklyn 99.

This is a show running at the height of the woke era. Back when Netflix, Disney, and HBO were forcibly shoving this ideology down our throats.

But B99 was different.

Yes, it had a few cringy moments, but a couple of characters from this show have probably done more for the gay community than all those shitty woke characters combined.

WHY?

Because they are not slapping the ideology on your face every chance they get. You just have competent, funny, relatable characters that happen to be gay. That's it. You like the character, and you become more accepting of the community.

This is an example of how you get people to be nicer to others.

But as I mentioned earlier, if a gifted Machiavellian is on the job, then you likely won’t notice that you are consuming propaganda. Whether it's about hating other people or consuming unhealthy foods, you'll behave as if it were your own idea.

Heck, you might develop a habit that lasts for decades.

Related: A Marketing Trick We Unknowingly Fall For

Ok, so far we have explained that great propaganda is subtle, but what if it isn't?

Rule #2 Spread White Noise

Whenever a politician or a government is involved in a big scandal, they cannot fight it with a more compelling story.

They do give their version, but the real game is being played in the TV studios and social media feeds. 

Let's take a TV debate because it all starts from there. 

Imagine you are an "independent" media figure explaining how the president isn't involved in a corruption scandal. 

The other media figure is a sniper. He has done his homework. He’s eloquently explaining how the president is indeed a crook. 

But you cannot allow that. How dare they accuse your supreme leader?

That's when you interrupt him.

You try to find his weak points, his character flaws, and then you attack, attack, attack. 

If they don’t have the necessary discipline to not take your bait, then you’ve won. He will start defending himself or talking about things that don’t really matter.

Good boy. You’ve successfully derailed the entire conversation.

The audience might hate you, but you are just doing your job.

Which brings us to...

Rule #3 Scapegoats

This is one of the most interesting techniques, and I don’t think someone else has explained this to you.

Every major political party has a bunch of media figures that get recycled. 

These individuals will shout in debates and say all kinds of spiteful, controversial things. 

Now you would think that they are spreading propaganda, but they’re not, because remember: True manipulation is subtle. Not everyone can spot it, at least not that quickly.

Their job (whether they realize it or not) is to get hated.

Yes. Their job is to get hated.

But why? How does this serve the party or the corporation?

  1. They are the biggest polluters of TV studios and social media
  2. They absorb the hate.

The second element is my own theory, btw. Immediately after a scandal, these figures multiply on your screen like cockroaches when the lights go out.

You can’t help but despise them, even if they’re protecting your favorite politician.

However, they are doing their absolute best to absorb all the resentment. This way, the leader's figure remains somewhat clean - It receives much less mud.

Once this scapegoat has turned black and red from all the hits, it is thrown away. Another scapegoat happily takes its place. The process repeats.

Related: The US Attorney General is Just... a Dirty Glove

Rule #4 Catastrophization 

I’ve explained this before, but it’s worth repeating. When the public is talking about things that don’t really matter, then nothing moves forward.

Let’s take the USA as an example.

You have seen the left media take Trump apart on how he looks, how he talks, how he walks, what others are saying, etc.

Basically, he makes the news every time he makes a fool of himself, which obviously is a LOT. 

The problem is that you are overwhelming people's attention.

You don't have enough quality media time left to talk about major corruption scandals, and god forbid discuss making STRUCTURAL CHANGES.

On the other hand, the right media will turn everything into an apocalyptic story.

They'll take some actual facts or events and exaggerate them to a point that the news/podcast/debate looks like an episode of The Blacklist.

Both of these political conglomerates are making highly engaging, highly entertaining content.

The problem is that you don't learn anything about what the fuck is actually happening. 

Rule #5 Division

We have explained that polarization is not a bug but a necessary feature of the system. 

The constant, senseless fights in the media make you feel helpless. You can’t help but form the idea that half the country is a bunch of dangerous morons. 

You feel alone.

As a human, you crave connection. 

To cope, you consume more content from your side and alienate those who think differently. 

You start to idolize those influencers who speak what you’re truly feeling.

That influencer might start with pure intentions, but they might get drunk on the newfound power and be inclined to dial up the rhetoric.

So we never try to cooperate or even talk with other people because we all distrust each other, which is the perfect condition to send the entire nation into…

Rule #6 Paralysis

Scandals do not move people anymore. Those are just episode ideas for a real reality TV show where we participate every single day.

I heard an actor the other day who perfectly summed it up: “Politicians have turned into theater actors and actors into politicians.”

We get angry. We fight with other ordinary people online. We forget about it. Another scandal drops. Rinse and repeat.

So you never see the full picture. You never feel the full gravity of the scandal. 

For example, when the protests erupted in Albania, I had the idea to create a list of the biggest scandals over the past 13 years. 

My goal was to modestly do my part to counteract the narrative that Kushner’s project would bring development. I was like, “How can we trust a party that has governed like a bunch of barbarians!”

While researching, I was surprised by how many scandals I had forgotten about, and keep in mind that I'm one of those political junkies. Now imagine the average person - They don’t really understand how fucked up the situation is.

So there are fights everywhere… In TV studios, comment sections, family dinners, and the workplace. There might even be some street demonstrations.

On the surface, it seems like something is moving; like the situation is improving, BUT the underlying structure is exactly the same.

Rule #7 Identity

The ultimate goal is to get you to tie your identity to the ideology or the product.

How can they do it?

It all starts with getting your attention. You watch their videos or attend their events.

You like what you hear, and you repeat the rituals - you use their catchphrases, watch their videos every day, buy their products, defend them whenever possible.

The principle of consistency kicks in. If you are doing it repeatedly, then you must value this.

You feel you're on the right side of the issue, and you resent the villain as presented by them.

A villain could be a leader, another group, an ideology, the system, etc.

You've fully adopted the narrative when you don't feel like an outsider trying to learn more about the situation, but like a soldier defending something precious.

There is massive power in fighting for something bigger than yourself. But guard your mind.

Once you start treating ordinary people like mortal enemies just because some talking head painted a target on their backs, you haven't joined a righteous cause.

You've just been programmed.


r/PersuasionExperts Jun 15 '26

Dark Psychology Did the Albanian Ruler CON Trump's Family?

202 Upvotes

Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump thought they were buying the next Monaco, but in reality, they walked right into a trap.

In July 2021, the couple was chilling on Nat Rothschild's yacht. 

That’s when Edi Rama - the colorful, incredibly corrupt PM of Albania - joins them.

He’s not there for pleasure.

His intention is to sell his country to save himself. 

What do I mean by this? He has criticized Trump and is involved in the McGonigal affair. 

He wants to be in Trump’s good graces so that the republicans don’t crush him like a bug.

He knows fully well that it's a VERY controversial deal because organized crime is involved in the theft of coastal lands and, of course, the fact that Albanians are going to be furious. 

So he must have framed Sazan Island as the ultimate project - an exclusive playground for the wealthy that would make Monaco look like a crowded public beach. 

Look, you have to understand that Rama is mediocre at his job as prime minister, but he's a true Machiavellian. He's a chameleon. He can sell ice to an Eskimo.

You have probably seen how US and EU diplomats have constantly, publicly supported him.

Just yesterday, Marta Kos (EU enlargement commissioner) said she had received guarantees that the project would comply with environmental laws, which is pure bs.  

So Rama shouldn't be underestimated. He is very skilled at manipulating and buying people, no matter how powerful they are. 

Now let’s go back to the meeting on the Rothschilds' yacht.

He was aware that Kushner almost bankrupted the family's real estate company; he definitely sniffed his weakness - that Kushner was someone anxious to make a name for himself.

He must have presented the lease of the Sazan Island as the deal of a lifetime, and Kushner was blinded by greed.

Honestly, can we blame him? I mean, he’s literally buying an invaluable piece of another country. It can make you feel like a conqueror. It's exhilarating.

Related: The Man Who Sold the Eiffel Tower

The narrative constructed by a veteran con man is incredibly seductive, but then you have to face the cold reality.

Kushner is no Warren Buffett.

He made a catastrophic mistake when he bought the Manhattan tower at 666 Fifth Avenue [number of the beast lol], but right now he's making a much bigger mistake. 

How?

Because even IF he manages to finalize the deal, the resort's reputation is already radioactive.

It has sparked ongoing protests across Albania.

For most of us, this isn't just about protecting that land; it’s become a literal mission to tear down our entire corrupt political system. 

This means that if Rama survives politically, the Albanians will still never forget. Sooner or later, we will stop that project or at least hurt it as much as possible.

In the other scenario, which we desperately hope to achieve, Rama is ousted, and whoever replaces him will do whatever it takes to kick Kushner out.

In my previous article, I explained that Rama did this to ensure that Trump would protect him, but I also laid out my suspicion that this project could serve as an international money-laundering machine. 

To my surprise, it didn't take long to be proven right. 

Before we go there, you need to understand that they are not only buying this mystical island that Ivanka discovered.

They also need the village of Zvernec, and we suspect they will get a chunk of the neighboring Narta Lagoon.

All three of these areas are protected. But we shouldn’t worry because Marta Kos said everything will be fine.

Now Kushner hasn’t signed the deal yet, but a shady company has already started working on the ground. 

The Albanian special prosecutors were watching. They had opened a case into how the Zvernec land was acquired, and they froze the accounts of the company holding it.

The land had been contested for 20 years and was allegedly sold on the basis of forged paperwork before being sold to Qatari billionaires. 

By following the money, they have targeted an international cocaine-trafficking and money-laundering group.

If our Prime Minister's treason wasn’t enough, there are reasonable concerns about having Epstein Island on our coast.

Think about it…

If the wealthy could do those horrific crimes on US soil and not get caught, and not get in front of justice to this day, imagine what they can do in a much more corrupt country.

Because you see, this island is isolated. It’s full of underground, interconnected tunnels, and no one has lived there for nearly 40 years. 

Is it a stretch to say that we should be concerned about what will happen in this resort?

When the protests erupted, the PM organized a meeting with his supporters. As an attempt to inoculate them, he said, and this is verbatim, I’m not making this up…

Maybe you haven’t heard that I eat kids. Yes. I eat kids. You’ll hear the news that I eat kids. They’ll also tell you this.

It’s interesting that he said that.

It’s a desperate attempt to move the attention away from the treacherous act of selling the land, but it’s also an admission of people’s suspicions that it will become another Epstein Island.

It’s like he knows what kind of people will become guests at this massive resort full of hidden tunnels. 

So this project faces opposition from Albanians worldwide, is already plagued by crime, and raises concerns about turning into a nest for degenerate wealthy people.

I don’t know if Trump is aware - probably he is - but Rama has bought off his protection. 

And the beauty is that even though it's a very important deal for him, Rama couldn't take the necessary steps to ensure it would be free of controversy.

You know, there's a predictable pattern... He promises billions in investments from prestigious global corporations, but when you look under the hood, it’s always shell companies, street thugs, and oligarchs.

Just this once, he could have played by the rules to keep the deal clean. 

But he didn’t.

A logical explanation why he wasn’t careful is that he might be so connected, so entrapped in the underworld, that he couldn’t do otherwise.

Nevertheless, because of his actions, the Trump family has yet another scandal on its hands, and this time it’s global. 

It is another strong card to play against Trump in the upcoming elections.

Think about it...

Why is this investment fund involved in building a resort on land that local prosecutors are currently investigating for being tied to organized crime? 

Why is he trying to annex an invaluable piece of Albania? 

I'm using the words "annex" or "colonize " because we will have no access to that place, and we don't want to sell it. That's why we have participated in the largest protests in our country since the fall of communism.

And the ultimate irony is the humiliation 

Rama rules a country the size of Maryland.

It's comical how a local politician managed to USE the family that loves to say they're "masters of the deal".

Learn More:


r/PersuasionExperts Jun 03 '26

Why Trump's Family Is Colonizing Albanian Lands

175 Upvotes

You have seen the video where Ivanka Trump is casually talking about how they plan to buy the Sazan Island. 

And part of that deal is the Zvernec village and the Narta lagoon. These areas are near the island.

Now, PM Edi Rama has said they will invest $4 billion, which will improve our financial situation.

But there's a teeny tiny problem.

We don't want to sell it - for any price.

We say, “Leave the area as it is… underdeveloped. We can make money elsewhere. For starters, we can try to overthrow a highly corrupt government. You know, that will instantly save us a fuck ton of money.” 

That horrendous project was just the tipping point.

We are sick and tired of rampant, barbaric corruption of the socialist party, and we want to change the entire model of how we have been governed these past 36 years.

We want democracy, and we want true development. Giving all that land so we can work as waiters and cleaners is not a good deal. We already have those kinds of jobs.

For over a week, protests have erupted in Tirana, which then spread to other cities, and now there are protests from the Albanian diaspora in Western Europe and the US.

What makes this project even more controversial is the suspicion that they will turn this beautiful, untouched land into a money-laundering paradise.

What's worse is that there have been certain allegations online. 

Jared Kushner, Trump, and Arab billionaires are known for their “decent behavior”, if you know what I mean. And now they will have a private, isolated island. 

I'm no conspiracy theorist, but you need to keep in mind that for close to 40 years, no one has lived on that island, and it is full of secret tunnels. It has room for multiple yachts. Heck, it even has a covert submarine base.

It’s isolated from the rest of the country, and it can easily be protected by those who might try to trespass.

Now let's talk about money.

Where’s Kushner getting the capital?

Kushner has no legitimate track record in private equity.

Before joining the White House, his most notable business achievement was nearly bankrupting his family's real estate company by buying an aging Manhattan office tower.

After Trump lost in 2021, he founded "Affinity Partners". 

A mere six months later, the Saudi Public Investment Fund dumped $2 billion into it.

The screening committee initially wanted to reject the deal. They looked at the pitch and explicitly noted that Affinity had no experience and had glaring issues across the board.

But the crown prince, Mohammad bin Salman, overruled them.

Later, it was revealed that Affinity has roughly $3 billion in assets under management, with a staggering $2 billion coming from Saudi Arabia and $1 billion from Qatar, the UAE, and Taiwanese billionaire Terry Gou.

In addition, it's interesting to note that Affinity has collected roughly $158 million from foreign investors, regardless of whether its investments are successful.

This has led critics to suspect that these are payments rather than investments.

Now, why would they bother with buying that land?

Because it contains untouched nature, and it is very cheap.

But I suspect that building such resorts in a country where corruption is rampant makes international money laundering incredibly easy.

Hypothetically, if an Albanian official wanted to launder money for an individual or company, they could inflate the prices of materials, buildings, and services.

This way, the illicit money flows through the books as legitimate expenses.

This hypothetical scenario is not based on some conspiracy. 

According to the State Department and GITOC, the construction sector in Albania is a primary channel for money laundering.

We are talking about a country with a documented vulnerability to money laundering.

So this resort can potentially, allegedly speaking, be used by corrupt officials to launder money on an international level.

Now, why would PM Rama do this?

Why would he strike a deal that the vast majority of Albanians consider downright treacherous?

In my view, the reason is purely out of political survival.

Since Rama is directly mentioned in the McGonigal case, it could be used against him.

After Biden left, Rama must have thought: "If people around Trump say that I've been a critical voice, they might convince him to green-light an attack".

Keep in mind that Rama is the head of the Socialist Party, the direct descendant of the Communist Party.

They have been a party since 1941, and you cannot achieve that longevity without a scarily effective propaganda machine.

However, that kind of power is nothing compared to what the State Department could do with a couple of statements, especially in the most pro-American country in the world.

So he desperately needed to be in Trump's good graces.

And he could only achieve that by doing something big - such as essentially leasing away an invaluable piece of Albania.

So Rama ensured a good relationship with a potentially lethal enemy, and oligarchs connected to him stand to make a lot of money, which can be used to keep us oppressed.

Now this news has spread globally, especially after that PR-written story of Ivanka Trump.

But I want to add that Albanians are forever grateful to the US for helping us in critical moments in our history. 

We are not against America, and we are not against Arabs, Israelis, Russians, or whoever the fuck is behind that project.

We don’t want to set a dangerous precedent. If we allow a bunch of wealthy people to take our lands, then the entire country could be up for grabs.

And as I said, we want to destroy a deeply corrupt system that has been going on for 36 years. We want to change everything from the ground up.

If this project fails, we'll face Trump's fury. I'm sure that just like Rama, he’s a very vengeful person.

Nevertheless, whatever happens, the risk is totally acceptable considering what’s at stake.

UPDATE:

So about 9 days ago, I explained here that I suspected this project could be used for international money laundering.

It turned out I was right very quickly.

SPAK is now investigating the land sold in the village of Zvërnec, where it passed through known drug traffickers and oligarchs - its price jumping dozens of times over - before reaching the hands of the Qatari billionaires.

And keep in mind that Zvërnec is critical to Kushner's project - he can't get Sazan Island without it.

Now imagine what happens if the entire project actually goes through. You would have Albanian politicians and oligarchs, Kushner, and Gulf investors get their hands on thousands of hectares of prime Mediterranean coastline.

Yes, that part of Albania could become a paradise... a money-laundering paradise.


r/PersuasionExperts May 25 '26

1000 Hours of Psychology in One Article

81 Upvotes

For the last decade, I've buried myself in psychology books and tried to apply what I've learned to figure out what makes people tick.

But unlike academics or media figures, I despise corporate talk. I know that memorizing Wikipedia phrases makes you look smart, but to me, psychology is a tool. It is supposed to help you gain clarity and solve real problems.

So in this article, I’ve picked the most practical lessons that will save you over 1000 hours of relentless studying.

It will give you a massive unfair advantage because while others are blind to the games being played around them, you will understand the hidden rules.

Sometimes you will be able to see the entire board. And that will often put you three steps ahead of everyone else. 

But nothing will work if you are falling for the biggest trap of the modern world. The idea that we are…

Apex Predators Made of Glass

If you look around online, you will notice that many people are obsessed with being damaged. And honestly, it's not their fault for feeling this way.

You see, modern society has convinced us to look at ourselves as fragile.

They forget that humans are highly resilient, adaptable creatures. You know it’s no coincidence that not only did we manage to climb to the top of the food chain, but we also got out of it.

Our ancestors had to hunt mammoths with pointy sticks; They had to deal with saber tigers, famine, volcanoes, earthquakes, and all sorts of dangers, yet we are taught to look at everyday setbacks or even massive failures as life-ending tragedies.

This is intentional because, by convincing us that we are weak, it has made it incredibly easy for them to keep us obedient and make more money from us.

However, if you believe in yourself and fight to get stronger and smarter, you still have to face…

The Venomous Envy of the Crowd

Once you start becoming successful, you will have people in your corner - People who genuinely appreciate the effort you have put in.  They look at your drive and ambition as a good thing. They know that those are necessary traits to push humanity forward.

But then... you have the crowd.

They will try to convince you that having power makes you greedy or even evil. And they will loudly claim that being poor and harmless automatically makes you virtuous.

People who are too terrified or simply unable to gain power will never admit it. Instead, they attack you. They pretend to do it out of high moral standards, but in reality, their behavior is often driven by pure envy.

That's why, if you are ambitious and want to achieve great things, you must never apologize for it.

You must never allow the hesitation that comes from the fear of what others will say to stop you.

But it's not just about envy. If you look closely at the moral crusaders, you'll discover a twisted secret, which brings us to... 

The Halo Deception

This might sound weird, but beware of the saint.

You know who I'm talking about. The person who is always parading their flawless morals. It’s like they make a full-time career out of looking pure.

But as you probably guessed, the brighter the halo, the sharper the horns.

When someone is secretly struggling with deeply messed-up urges, their brain cannot accept it. They refuse to admit they even have a dark side, let alone actually deal with it. 

As a result, they create this obnoxious "holier-than-thou" persona to throw everyone - including themselves - off the scent. 

This is why these loud moral crusaders often have the most twisted internet search histories.

So don't buy the fake mask, and definitely don't let them make you feel inadequate.

Just sit back, smile, and wait. Sooner or later, that mask is going to crack. 

And when it does, it will be very interesting to witness.

But while they are busy drowning in their feelings of inferiority, you need to understand a very liberating truth about your own mind.

The Danger of Purity

Have you ever had a sudden, random urge to stab a rude stranger, or to slap a teacher or even a parent right in the face?

Have you ever wanted to sleep with someone who is strictly forbidden, like the girlfriend of your friend? 

If you have... relax. You are not an evil person. 

For centuries, society and religion have systematically brainwashed us into feeling overwhelming guilt simply for having thoughts

Sure, they are negative thoughts and feelings, but you don't have to act on them. There’s no need to make a big fuss about it.

The reality is we have roughly 6200 thoughts every single day, and the vast majority of them are completely out of our control. 

Does it make any logical sense to fight them? Does it make sense to torture yourself with guilt over a random misfire of neurons? Of course not. 

In fact, simply accepting that these dark thoughts and feelings exist is actually very healthy for you. Because the less you fight them, the less likely you are to ever act on them. 

So you are finally free from guilt. But as you look around, you'll realize that most people are terrified of standing alone. They desperately crave a tribe. 

But instead of putting in the hard work to build a real community, they use a cheat code to bond with each other...

The Unholy Alliances

We all know that a nation or a community is held together by shared values and shared history. No doubt about that. But there's another, much darker social glue. A glue that will keep any group together, even if the people inside it have massive differences.

I'm talking about shared hatred. It is such a powerful force that when groups or even countries don't have someone to hate, they will literally manufacture an enemy out of thin air.

Why is this important?

Because when you are busy fighting and hating another group, you overlook the stark differences.

For example, you have the left, Muslims, and the LGBTQ+ community forming a united front because they support Palestine but also because they despise Israel and deservingly so.

Another example is the populist right and anti-war leftists, or the right and gay conservatives (LGB without the T)

When you see the unholy alliances, understand that they share a common enemy. And if that enemy is destroyed or vanishes, they will immediately remember why they hate each other. 

But before that happens, what do all sorts of massive alliances have in common?

They are very loud, sometimes even violent, and they share the belief that they are changing the system.

When in reality they are probably falling for

The Illusion of Progress

Every ruthless government, every mega-corporation uses the same playbook. They allow what I like to call controlled rebellions.

Smart dictators know you can't oppress people non-stop. You have to let them blow off some steam; otherwise, heads will eventually roll… including their own.

So, they let you march the streets,  insult them on social media, and from time to time they throw a few corrupt politicians in jail or force them to resign. You know, the ones who were stupid enough to get caught.

Or if it’s a corporation, they’ll fire a CEO, sack a few managers, issue a public apology, and donate to whatever cause is trendy that week.

Long story short, they'll throw a symbolic bone to the masses.

Does this mean that you should stop protesting or complaining?

Of course not. If anything, you should be more vocal, more intense. But you also need to pay attention to how they respond. Don’t bite the symbolic bone, no matter how big it is. You need to keep fighting until there are actual, structural changes. 

Ok, up until now, we have exposed how society is trying to manipulate us. 

But if we want undeniable power, we have to do something really scary. We have to confront the sick games we are currently playing that are sabotaging our success.

The Body’s Alibi

Have you ever noticed that when you have to do something you really really hate, you suddenly get a splitting headache? Or your stomach mysteriously acts up right before a difficult situation?

You probably tell yourself it’s bad luck. Or bad takeout. And sure, sometimes it is. But more often than not, it is a biological exit strategy.

Here’s what is happening in the dark corners of your brain. You desperately want to get out of a commitment, but you are too polite to say no.

So your mind is forced to come up with an alibi for you. Your unconscious mind is literally causing the physical issue just to give you a good excuse to bail.

That’s why the next time you're torn about whether to do something, I highly recommend you make a firm choice. Either do it, or don't do it. Try your best not to sit on the fence, because as you can see, it’s not healthy.

Another trap that many of us fall into is…

The Coward's Shield

Most people think laziness is simply a lack of energy or motivation.

But more often than not, laziness is a highly calculated, cunning strategy to protect your pride.

Think about it. If you actually try your absolute best and fail, you are forced to face the truth that you are not good enough.

On the other hand, if you stay lazy and never try, then you can keep the illusion that you do have a lot of potential, but you know... it’s just that you don’t put it to work.

So laziness protects you from the sting of failure. But what happens when your other obvious flaws start catching up to you?

You either are forced to make some radical changes, or you have to do some outstanding PR for yourself.

The Fake Rebellion

Highly effective people are able to adapt to changing situations.

But those who chronically fail do something entirely different. They take their worst traits and frame them as virtues.

For example, if you are a coward, you get to call yourself cautious.

If you are arrogant and nobody likes you, you get to tell yourself you are a misunderstood genius. And if you are flat-out lazy, you get to claim that you are refusing to participate in a corrupt system.

Now this could be true. You might have legitimate reasons to feel that way.

But more often than not, you are not fighting a noble rebellion. You are simply renaming your failures.

And the tragedy is that you have actual great qualities, and your life could be amazingly different if you cultivated them, but by being incredibly dishonest with yourself, you get stuck in this miserable loop.

And speaking of fake rebellions... There is a type of person who takes this illusion to the extreme. 

The Reverse Puppet

You definitely know this person. They reject every tradition, oppose every rule, and automatically hate whatever is popular. 

We can call them the professional contrarian.

They love to parade around wearing the “ultra-independent free thinkers” badge.

But true independence means looking at the facts and deciding for yourself, regardless of what society thinks.

The professional contrarian doesn't do that. They haven’t cultivated the ability to think for themselves. They look at what the authority figure is doing, and they blindly, predictably do the exact opposite.

Look: If your entire identity requires a system to push against, you are not a rebel. Your behavior is still 100% dictated by the same authority you claim to hate.

In other words, you are a puppet on a reverse string.

So this kind of rebel is a loud, annoying fraud. But they are mostly harmless.

The real danger lies in the people who refuse to rebel out loud. The ones who swallow all their toxic inferiority, perhaps coupled with innate issues, and let it rot in the dark corners of their mind for years, because eventually... 

The monster gets out

We have all seen it on the news.

A quiet, seemingly normal person commits a massive fraud or mass murders.

Society is always shocked. The media loves to claim that they "snapped," that it came completely out of nowhere.

But it didn't. That event was never a sudden mistake. It was the final, terrifying result of a sick mindset they’ve been hiding for years.

Long before he actually committed the act, he was drowning in intense feelings of inferiority.

And instead of trying to fix themselves as the rest of us do, they were convinced that the world was the problem. That he’s just a victim surrounded by evil people who have stepped on him without mercy.

So that final act of insanity is the logical conclusion of collecting a debt that he thinks society or the victims owe them.

That is what happens when someone decides to punish the outside world for their pain. But there is another devious form of revenge. One where you do not commit a horrendous crime against others... you commit it against yourself.

The Fake Martyr

You know that it is a sin to hate your parents, your siblings, or even the authority figures in your life. So when you understandably resent them… what do you do? You repress the f*** out of it.

We already saw how this repressed rage turns people into fake saints or ticking time bombs. But there is a third possibility.

Instead of confronting the people who wronged you, you unconsciously decide to blow up your own future.

You throw away your talent. You sabotage your career. You destroy your relationships. You actively turn yourself into a walking disaster.

The obvious question is why? Why on earth would you do this to yourself?

Because by being a complete failure, you become the living, breathing proof of what a terrible job they did raising you.

You are weaponizing your own misery. You are using your ruined life as a giant, undeniable middle finger to your family or society.

I know it's a sick game. It sounds unbelievable. But it actually happens - and is more common than you think. 

But driving off a cliff takes effort. What about the people who are too terrified to even take the steering wheel in the first place?

They find a much easier escape route.

The Relief of Being Imprisoned

Have you ever wondered why so many people turn into rabid political or religious fanatics or happily bow down to oppressive governments?

You might call them brainwashed. And you would be right. But let’s go a bit deeper here.

They have secretly signed an invisible contract.

You see, being an adult, being an independent thinker, is very scary for them. They cannot handle that burden.

So what do they do?

They eagerly surrender themselves to a movement, a leader, or an extreme ideology.

They do this so they never have to think about complex things ever again. 

They blindly follow the doctrine because to them, being in a mental prison is much easier than taking responsibility. 

Btw it’s a similar reasoning for people addicted to alcohol or drugs. One of the main reasons why they use it is because it helps them escape real life.

The Toxicity Trap

You probably have a friend who’s a very nice person but has this pesky habit of dating losers.

Or you have watched hard-working people stay loyal to horrible bosses.

It makes you go crazy. You want to shake them. "What the f*** are you doing? You deserve better!"

Now why does this happen?

Usually, it's because they were treated terribly in the past - either while growing up or by previous partners. And because the abuse went on for a long time, they eventually accepted it as standard behavior.

They are so wired for drama that a normal, peaceful relationship feels weird to them. It makes them suspicious.

Without even realizing it, they become a magnet for people who treat them like dirt. In a sick, twisted way, being in a toxic relationship is the only thing that feels like home.

But as frustrating as it is to watch someone stay in a toxic relationship, it doesn't even compare to dealing with a person whose entire identity is built on a house of cards.

The Radioactive Ego

You have met people who will twist into a pretzel rather than admit they made a simple mistake.

It's maddening.

Even though you give proof and strong arguments, they still insist that you are wrong or that it's not their fault.

They behave this way because their identity is at stake. You see, for most of us, being wrong is not such a big deal. We accept it and move on.

But for them, admitting they made a mistake will trigger a radioactive belief that they are stupid, defective, and fundamentally unworthy.

So don’t get mad at them; Simply try to understand where it's coming from, and walk away.

The "Try-Hard" Curse

If you go to a party and try really hard to be funny or confident, you come off as awkward and desperate, right? Or if you get into bed and force yourself to fall asleep, you will lie wide awake staring at the ceiling. 

Happiness works the same way.

You cannot pursue happiness.

It must ensue. 

You must get rid of this habit of obsessing over what you are feeling at any given moment, and instead you have to focus on the external world. 

Practically speaking... You solve complex problems; you connect deeply with other people; You experience nature, art, culture - you know everything that is beautiful; You carry a burden; You're responsible; You fight for something larger than yourself.

The idea is to stop obsessing over yourself and find ways to better connect with others and enjoy the beauty of the world.

After all, the world is not just darkness; it’s not just tragedy; there are amazing things as well.

The Unbothered Cheat Code 

When a coworker snaps at you, you get angry and think they are a toxic jerk. But when you snap at others, you did it because you are stressed, you had a terrible night's sleep, your kids were screaming… The idea is that it's completely justified.

Do you notice the double standard?

We judge others by their permanent character, but we judge ourselves by our temporary circumstances.

This is one of the main reasons why you get stressed and drown in unnecessary drama.

You are taking things personally when most of the time, the other person is just having a bad Tuesday.

So if you want to be unbothered, give them the same pass you eagerly give yourself.

It will really prevent a lot of unnecessary suffering.

Killing Your Hero

We all idolize someone. A celebrity, an artist, a politician, or a brilliant entrepreneur. And that can be a great thing because it helps you work harder to reach their level.

However, things get complicated for us when we try to copy them.

The reason is that when you spend your life trying to copy that person, you end up overwriting your actual self without realizing it. You become a hollow imitation.

So here is how you fix it:

When you start noticing differences in your thinking, or you have traits that differ from your idol's, don't sweep them under the rug. Don't automatically assume they are right and you are wrong. 

Instead, test your own way.

If your hero preaches waking up at 4 AM, but you tend to do your best work late at night... stay up late. If they handle problems by being bold or a little aggressive, but you are naturally a person who takes things slow and steady, then trust your methodical nature. 

You need to actively work to discover and let your natural self come out. 

In other words, to become powerful, you must commit psychological murder. You have to kill your idol.  That's when you start becoming your own character.

But you must be careful that you don’t look for shortcuts as most people do, because as you are about to see, shortcuts are the ultimate trap.

Which brings us to your final lesson...

The Hack Illusion

When you are learning about psychology or any other complex subject, it's tempting to learn a bunch of cool tips and tricks.

And while that's fun, tricks alone won't get you far.

What happens once a situation doesn't go as planned?

You're left like a fish out of water.

You need a different approach. Identify the core skills of that subject, then practice each one until they're second nature.

Now you can adapt to anything, because you're not running a script.

Your attention opens up too. When your mind isn't busy recalling the next line, it picks up on the subtle details about a person or situation that everyone else misses.

This will help you adapt to all sorts of situations because you are not relying on a script. 

This sounds like a ton of repetitive work, but trust me, it saves you years.

That’s why I built my advanced psychology course this way. Because I know that we shouldn't rely on tricks alone. You need to master a handful of core skills.

We focus primarily on discipline, presence, persuasion, becoming insanely charismatic, and outsmarting Machiavellians - because these are the skills that actually move the needle.

So head over to Social OS to learn more and join this subreddit because you’ll learn things that you won’t get anywhere else.

Update: This article is to help you recognize patterns in your own life. It's not a research paper where I need to include the terms and citations. But a user raised the question about the accuracy [which is the most important thing], so here's the list of sources. I explain what's established and my interpretation.

As always, if you have any questions, don't hesitate to comment.

You Might Like:


r/PersuasionExperts May 25 '26

Johann Weyer: The Medieval Saul Goodman

13 Upvotes

I stumbled across the story of a medieval Dutch doctor named Johann Weyer. This guy was so brilliant, so manipulative, that he is basically the medieval Saul Goodman.

I mean, picture this.

You are a doctor living in 16th-century Europe, and you suffer from a pesky problem… You actually have a working brain.

You are watching the elites, the judges, the masses, and they are all going batshit crazy.

They are dragging old women into the streets, they would accuse them of witchcraft, and burn them alive at the stake.

You know these women are innocent.

You know the entire country, and the rest of Western Europe as well, is possessed by a bloodthirsty mass delusion.

And you desperately want to stop them. But how? How do you do that? It seems impossible to reason with a mob that has gone rabid.

That's why you don't use reason.

You use manipulation.

And that's what we are going to talk about today - Manipulation. How this doctor wrote a simple book, but was able to convince an entire country to stop being savages.

His secret was that he framed the argument in a way so that he plants the seeds of doubt in the minds of the elite while - and this is very important - ensuring that he doesn't end up at the stake.

Now, obviously, he never argued in court, but I have created this hypothetical court scene to make his arguments easier to understand.

So, you have the judges glaring down from the bench, ready to light the match.

How does he stop them? 

“Your honor”, he says, “Let's clear the air right out of the gate. The devil? Oh, he's real, absolutely. We are 100% on the same page here. But let's use the brains God gave us for a second.

We are talking about the Prince of Darkness here, the big guy downstairs.

Do you really think a guy with that kind of resume needs an old peasant woman to cause a rainstorm or destroy your crops? Come on!

His power, his only real power, is deception. He's a conman. The original grifter! The father of lies! It's right there on his business card.

Now, I want you to look at my client.

Go on, take a good look at Gretchen here.

Does she look like a cosmic threat to you?

No. She's 70 years old, she's frail, and she's suffering from a very real, very physical medical condition that I, as a man of medicine, call melancholy.

Her body is sick, your honors. Her mind is weak. And what does the devil do? He's an opportunist. He gets into her diseased brain, and suddenly she thinks she's flying on brooms and doing the tango with a goat man in the forest.

Now, I know what the prosecution will say. But she confessed! Well, yeah, she confessed! Because the devil played her like a cheap lute.

She's not lying to you. She actually bought the con. And sure, you can take poor old Gretchen down to the dungeon.

You can torture her. But you know, and I know, that you're never going to get the truth. Why? Because a terrified human in agonizing pain will say literally anything you want to hear, just to make it stop.

Now, here's where it gets really twisted, your honor. Do you really think the devil cares about the soul of this peasant woman? She's got no power. She's small potatoes.

The devil doesn't want her.

He wants YOU.

He wants the judges' soul.

He wants the souls of the clergy.

I know what you're thinking. You're saying, “Hey, doc, we are just following the rules. Law of Moses, anybody? Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live?”

But read the fine print. That law was meant for poisoners. It was meant for cold-blooded killers who know exactly what they are doing.

Whereas my client has never, in her life, hurt a fly.

So let's call a spade a spade. Every time you sentence one of these poor women to the fire, you are committing cold-blooded murder.

But you don't see it that way, do you? You think you're just doing your civic duty. Which means that you are never going to repent. You are never going to ask for forgiveness, right?

And that is the long con.

That is exactly how Satan wins.

If you keep this ungodly crusade, one day you're going to stand in the ultimate court - The court of Christ. And he is going to hold you personally accountable for every single drop of innocent blood that you spill today.

So the choice is yours, your honors.

Do you want to be a healer?

Or do you want to risk losing your soul?

The defense rests.”

So this is essentially how Dr. Weyer argued in his book.

Now, was he effective?

Did he actually stop witchcraft?

Well… not immediately.

But he forced the intellectual elite - the theologians, the doctors, and the jurists - to engage with his ideas.

If you were to talk about witchcraft and demons, which was all trendy at the time, you had to wrestle with his arguments.

Plus, over the years, the culture changed. People of different religions had to live together, which created a more tolerant society.

And at the same time, skepticism increased.

Eventually, the execution of women for witchcraft was stopped altogether.

Interestingly, that was not the only achievement.

Again, I manufactured the court scene for dramatic effect. But his core arguments are historically accurate and quite visionary.

Here's why…

First, he separated biological problems from spiritual ones.

He looked at mental health problems that today we call delusions, paranoia, or severe depression, and he classified them as melancholy. 

He considered them a physical illness originating in the body.

This was incredibly important, very visionary, because this means that those people shouldn't be taken care of by the church or, in some cases, sent to be burned at the stake, but they needed to be treated by a doctor. 

In other words, he laid the groundwork of psychiatry.

Second, he argued against torture.

Centuries before it became a standard legal defense, Weier pointed out the blindly obvious fact that breaking a person's bones until they scream, “I did it”, is not proof.

He knew that coerced confessions are garbage evidence.

Third, he introduced the concept of diminished capacity into criminal law.

He argued that if someone is mentally ill, they cannot have the free will required to knowingly commit a crime.

You cannot execute someone for an action that they took while they were entirely disconnected from reality.

However, it's important that we don't mistake Dr. Weier for some 21st-century progressive activist.

He was still a man of the 1500s.

Weier 100% believed in demons, but he argued that these poor women were just delusional.

However, the real threat to society was the Magi, educated male sorcerers who actually knew how to summon the forces of evil.

In other words, he was telling the judges to stop wasting good firewood on these sick grandmas and hunt for the actual dark wizards.

Regardless of his medieval beliefs, his brilliant Saul Goodman-esque book worked.

His writings planted a seed that eventually convinced his fellow Dutch to completely stop the witch trials.

And because of arguments like this, the courts started demanding an incredible amount of hard proof before an interrogator was ever allowed to use torture.

When the Dutch rebelled against the Spanish Empire, they used this rational approach as the ultimate political flex.

They were like, “Look at the Spanish Inquisition- how barbaric, how savage they are- while we are an enlightened republic of law and order”.

By 1610, they had essentially shut down the executions for good.

They were the first country to do so, and it took the rest of Western and Central Europe around 200 years to catch up to the standard set by the Dutch.

Learn More:


r/PersuasionExperts May 17 '26

Why True Believers Turn Into The Most Vicious Haters

8 Upvotes

If you want to see pure hatred, don't look at rival political mobs screaming at each other.

Look at the person who just woke up and realized they wasted years of their life believing a massive lie.

Picture someone who is a true believer. They will fight tooth and nail for a cause, an ideology (political or religious), or a leader.

They will defend it against all logic and reason. But then, the words of the non-believers start to make a crack in his mind.

With time, that crack gets wider and wider until they open their eyes. Now they see clearly that they have been played for a fool.

If they have fought rabidly for the cause, if they would happily bleed for the ideology, now they have turned into crusaders.

To better understand this, let’s look at addiction.

If you've ever lived with someone hooked on drugs, alcohol, or gambling, you know how this cycle works.

They’ll look you dead in the eye and swear they are cutting back, or that they've quit entirely.

You might feel hopeful that they’ve finally come to their senses.

But inevitably, a month or three passes, they take a little taste, and before you know it, they are plunging right back into hard usage like nothing ever changed.

The truth is that they never quit. They were simply taking a temporary break.

They might have truly believed they had reached the tipping point, and they probably convinced you too, but the underlying psychological grip never let go.

The behavior of someone who truly escapes the claws of addiction is different.

These people rarely make a spectacle out of it. They politely refuse a drink and quietly mention they are sober.

But if you dig deeper - if you really try to understand how the fuck this person is not getting wasted, you will discover a profound shift.

They are not just avoiding it. They are physically and mentally disgusted by it. So much so that they have or will become the most ruthless advocates against alcohol, drugs, smoking, gambling, etc.

It's weird to witness this transformation.

It doesn't seem to make any sense.

But it does.

The reason is that they are no longer brainwashed.

They have finally understood the gravity of their entrapment... How they hurt themselves and their loved ones.

What’s heavier is the realization that they have done all of this needlessly. All this destruction is pointless.

I mean, when you are addicted, destruction has a purpose. Stealing from your parents, committing a crime, fighting with your family, it all feels justified - Your brain literally believes the substance is necessary for survival.

But once the brainwashing stops, they realize that it truly was pointless.

They are finally clearly seeing that this substance has never been their loyal companion. It was a vicious parasite - A true wolf in sheep's clothing.

It's the same mechanism when you abandon an ideology [Christianity, Islam, Mormonism, Scientology, the far left, the far right, etc].

Think about it.

You dedicate a great deal of time and energy, and you even sacrifice your closest relationships for it. And it all makes sense because you are not doing it needlessly. You are fighting a holy war.

And then, for whatever reason, you get disillusioned; you de-brainwash yourself; then you can't help but feel deeply betrayed; you can't help but feel deeply used and manipulated...

So what is left except a burning contempt for the lies that stole those years of your life?

But there's another darker route people take when faced with disillusionment.

When the cracks start to show, most people cannot stomach the humiliation of admitting they were conned.

So instead of breaking free, they actively work to maintain their own brainwashing. They willingly and actively work to become a bigger sheep - all it’s needed to avoid the pain of the truth.

You have seen the fanatics. You see the people who incite hatred, fights, and even commit heinous crimes in the name of the ideology. And you would think they are the true believers. 

They might be. But more often than not, those are the biggest doubters in the room.

As a way to compensate for the relentless, heretical doubts, they speak more loudly, and they attack or even kill others to "prove" their loyalty.

So if you're a fanatic, the odds are high that you have strong doubts.

Note: I'm not saying that any particular political or religious ideology is wrong, evil, or anything like that.

I'm just looking from the perspective of someone who was a true believer and is not anymore.

It's very difficult for them to have a "quiet divorce". 

They don't just quit; they also have to be a crusader against the substance or ideology.

And since it feels like a deep betrayal, the backlash is very strong.

You Might Also Like:

How I quit smoking after 8 years (effortlessly)

The Meeting That Made China a Global Superpower

This Radical Idea Will 10X Your Charisma

How To Harness Your Dark Side


r/PersuasionExperts May 17 '26

Dark Psychology This story perfectly illustrates communism

7 Upvotes

Under the communist regime in Albania, there was a notorious place called the prison of Spac. It was built into the face of a mountain where winters are harsh and summers insufferable.

Now, this place is not for criminals.

It is reserved for those who dare to speak against the regime.

These people are forced to work in the mines, surviving on scraps and enduring systematic torture.

It is a place designed to break even the toughest souls.

But then something special happens.

A small puppy slips through a hole in the prison fence.

The prisoners take him close; they raise him; they name him Tart, and feed him with the little bread they have.

Over time, Tart grows up to be a big, loyal dog.

For them, he's a humane thing in a place guarded by animals.

Then the political prisoners organize a massive revolt that brings the entire prison to its knees. For three days, there’s a vicious fight against the guards.

They don’t have any illusion that they can gain their freedom, but all they ask from the regime is to be treated like humans.

During the chaos, Tart is witnessing his friends being beaten, so he fearlessly attacks the guards and the special forces.

The regime swiftly rejects their demands and brings in the army.

The revolt is crushed, and the prisoners face further punishment. Most of them receive added sentences, while the 4 main organizers are sentenced to death.

For their sublime act of courage and resistance, today they’re remembered as martyrs of freedom.

But the regime isn’t done...

They gather all the prisoners, set up a hanging tripod, and announce that there will be one more trial.

This time, the accused is Tart.

One of the prisoners, a former Colonel, says to the guard: “Please don't hurt him, if you want a soul, take mine instead.”

“Don’t worry”, one of the guards sneered, “Your turn will come.”

Tart becomes the fifth martyr.

Now there are 3 core lessons we can learn from what happened in Albania that can help us better understand authoritarian regimes.

First, you must never underestimate human brutality.

History has repeatedly shown that ordinary men, in the sense that they’re not clinically insane, are capable of doing horrendous acts.

In this case, at first, the guards might have been hesitant; they might even have felt sick at having to punish their fellow man.

But as they keep going, they develop a hatred for them and show no mercy. 

You know, the guards will eventually lose their humanity.

They’re at a level below animals.

They become more cruel than their superior officers and even more cruel than the rulers of the communist party. 

The second lesson is that an authoritarian leader will do whatever it takes to kill the brain of that society.

He does it by keeping people dumb and poor.

It will identify those wise, mentally tough individuals and will find a way to silence them. It will ruin their reputation (character assassination), imprison them, or kill them.

What’s left, then, is a society full of people who are capable of doing their jobs but not more.

You had very skilled individuals. They were capable drivers, doctors, engineers, builders, teachers… But they weren’t wise. They couldn’t think for themselves. They couldn’t get out of the trap of propaganda.

As a result, they were unable to train the new generation to become independent. 

Now, people love to say there were some good things about communism, and I agree.

They built a massive artificial lake and 3 hydropower plants. They fought illiteracy and advocated for equal gender rights. They also built roads, schools, hospitals, factories...

When we talk about the achievements of communism, I often joke by saying, “Of course, you are building all of that when you have an entire population working for a loaf of bread for 5 fucking decades.”

Or I'm like: "US, Denmark, Switzerland, and others are so unlucky. They didn't have communism, and that's why they are so backward."

All joking aside, no matter what they have achieved, in no way does it justify the deaths of 14,000 people and the killing of the brains of the population.

It also doesn’t justify shutting off the warrior spirit.

Historically, Albanians have always fought against much bigger opponents and managed to protect themselves.

The enemy after WW2 was different. We were completely blindsided by the ideology. We didn’t really understand how communism had infected the population until it was too late.

We did manage to overthrow the regime in 1991, and that’s a great achievement. I mean, look at Iran, Cuba, Venezuela… They are still oppressed.

The problem is that the new government didn’t really make radical changes. They didn’t set up a system to punish those communists who committed crimes; they didn’t educate the population and help them heal.

In retrospect, it was clear that the population no longer had the warrior spirit.

They were entirely broken.

We know this by what happened next.

In the 90s, scammers stole $1.2 billion through pyramid schemes, which then triggered a civil war.

To make matters worse, the army didn’t protect the weapon depots, and now ordinary people were armed to the teeth.

Here’s where it gets really interesting…

You would think a heavily armed population would destroy the two major parties who were responsible for their lives being ruined, but no… Instead, they killed each other.

After the civil war, the same politicians who were responsible for the crisis were back in power as if nothing had happened. None of them had a single scratch.

And here we are today: Still a weak population.

The third lesson is that communist and other types of totalitarian regimes engage in unnatural selection.

They pick the weakest people (psychologically speaking) and put them in key positions of power. These individuals do not work for the good of the family, let alone the country; they work for the good of the party.

On the other hand, the psychologically strong people - the ones who saw beyond propaganda, the ones who didn't compromise their values and principles (even though they knew the punishment) - were imprisoned, tortured, or killed.

Their families were not spared either. I'm not exaggerating when I say that they were second-class citizens.

And those who got out of prison had no status at all, despite their capabilities. You know, there have been many cases of people with prestigious diplomas... people who clearly had a high IQ level... who worked as cleaners.

Now, you might say, "I happen to live in a free country, so my mind is safe."

Well, not really. Because the methods of brainwashing and menticide are being applied everywhere, the only difference is that in democratic countries, they’re used in a subtle way.

I’ve explained in detail in this video:

How they keep you poor, afraid, and utterly hopeless


r/PersuasionExperts May 13 '26

making money with my gf with se

Thumbnail
1 Upvotes

r/PersuasionExperts Apr 27 '26

Dark Psychology The AI Cartel: How Big Tech Monopolized AI

10 Upvotes

In May 2023, the very people building our future - AI engineers, executives, billionaires, academics - they all signed a soap-opera level statement:

Mitigating the risk of extinction from AI should be a global priority alongside other societal-scale risks such as pandemics and nuclear war.

Yes, the same AI that often hallucinates and tells you what you want to hear will one day enslave humanity.

Now I understand why the engineers who are actually building this stuff are worried. But why are the CEOs being so vocal about it?

If your product is terrifyingly powerful, why not work quietly to limit its capabilities instead of going on a media tour saying you're spending billions and billions of dollars to literally train Skynet?

Logically, it seems like a terrible business move.

Except, it's not. At all.

You see, there are cases where corporations will beg the government to set stricter regulations in their industry.

For example, Philip Morris, the biggest tobacco corporation on Earth, the actual destroyer of worlds [Oppenheimer is not even close], was very supportive of the Tobacco Control Act.

And people were surprised. How is it that these guys are suddenly concerned about our health!

Obviously, they don’t give a fuck about your health. But by backing strict rules on advertising and on reaching smokers, they ensured that any new companies would face a massive uphill battle.

Since Philip Morris already owned most of the market, this basically cemented their top position.

Funny enough, their rivals called this law "The Marlboro Monopoly Act". 

Say what you want about tobacco, but they are creative as fuck. And this comes from necessity.

After advertising on TV and in newspapers was banned, they flipped to buying placements on movies and TV shows; they sold merchandise; sponsored F1 teams; placed tobacco shelves in the eye line of children; sold menthol or bubble gum cigarettes… They found ways to overcome those strong limitations and thrive more than before.

Or look at what’s happening to Ukraine. Not only did they resist the invasion of Russia, but they developed superior drone technology, and they’re even using robots. 

We deviated a little, but the idea is that when you put immense pressure on a group of people, an organization, or a country, they either get destroyed or they adapt and become insanely powerful.

Let me give you another example because it is very interesting and relevant.

In the 1920s, the US banned alcohol.

People who advocated and brought this law were religious and social groups concerned about the soul of the nation. That's perfectly understandable. 

But there was another group that secretly paid politicians to keep the prohibition going for as long as possible.

I'm talking about organized crime.

Why would they do that?

Their main revenue sources were drugs, extortion, and gambling.

But despite the ban, people will drink.

And organized crime was making a ton of money by selling it.

Granted, it was low quality, but...

So you have a group that is genuinely concerned, and you have another that doesn’t care about the issue but stands to make a ton of money.

A similar thing is happening today.

You have the godfathers of AI and the engineers who are really terrified of what they are making, but then you have the CEOs amplifying those fears to crush independent developers.

They are essentially ensuring their monopoly.

How are they pulling it off?

Well, imagine you are a brilliant developer. Your vision is to build powerful, open-source AI models so that the average Joe can get the most out of this technology.

As is the case with many developers, they are people who work to move mankind forward.

They're the embodiment of Prometheus.

But Big Tech is making sure that never happens. To understand how you need to look at FLOPs. Think of a FLOP as the horsepower of an AI. 

The smarter the AI model, the more horsepower it needs to run.

In late 2023, the White House and the EU set a legal threshold of 10^26 FLOPs.

If your AI crosses that line, you face bureaucratic hell. You suddenly need lawyers to ensure that what you've built is compliant with the regulations.

Now we have to consider that no matter how smart you are, you cannot build a model that is close to ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini. Because you need hundreds of millions of dollars to train the model.

So why does Big Tech even bother to advocate for this threshold?

Because they know that when hardware gets too expensive, the software gets insanely efficient.

Eventually, these developers will design algorithms so smart that they will bypass those hardware limits. And sure enough... In early 2023, a developer named Georgi Gerganov released llama.cpp. It basically made it possible to run a massive AI model on your laptop.

Now imagine the evolution of open source models 3, 5, or 10 years from now.

Big Tech is anticipating that some genius in a garage will finally figure out how to train a top-tier model on a tight budget. And when they do, they will hit that 10^26 threshold.

As a result, they won't be hailed as visionaries, but they'll be legally classified as "systemic risk". You know, developers love nothing more than being buried in legal paperwork and fees.

The “AI Doomer” and “AI bubble” narratives have been gaining traction and scaring off investors.

So Big Tech has set its sights on one of the biggest cash cows in the US... The Department of Defense.

The Pentagon recently gave simultaneous $200 million contracts to OpenAI, Google, XAI, and Anthropic.

But don't forget that Microsoft and Amazon are the ones providing the secure cloud infrastructure to host all of this.

They are all feeding from the same trough.

What does this actually mean for you? 

If an independent developer makes a massive breakthrough, not only will they face legal troubles, but technically speaking, the US military can step in to take or buy their work.

If you think I'm exaggerating, look at what happened with Anthropic.

The DOD wanted Anthropic to remove their safety guidelines - You know, what keeps the AI from being used for domestic mass surveillance and fully autonomous weapons.

Anthropic refused.

In response, the DOD canceled its contract and slapped them with the label: "Supply-chain Risk to National Security."

This is usually reserved for foreign adversaries like Huawei or Kaspersky, which might install backdoors for espionage into US systems. It’s a label that has never been used against an American company simply over a contract dispute. 

It's like working at Home Depot and refusing an order from the CEO to secretly copy the house keys of every customer who buys a lock. They not only fire you but also classify you as an enemy so that no other store in the country can work with you again.

But wait, it gets better…

Within hours of Anthropic being purged, OpenAI signed a larger contract with the Pentagon. They claim that they will maintain strict red lines, but should we really believe them? Are they serious, ethical people? I'm not accusing them of anything. Just asking questions.

So the idea is that if this military-tech cartel is willing to publicly execute a massive corporation, imagine what they could do to a startup or an independent developer.

The Mask is OFF.


r/PersuasionExperts Apr 26 '26

Dark Psychology When The AI Agent Went Rogue

9 Upvotes

Millions of people are granting access to their emails, social media accounts, and computers to an untested piece of open-source code.

They think they are getting a digital butler, but in reality, they are begging to be robbed blind. 

Let me introduce you to OpenClaw.

It is the brainchild of a developer named Peter Steinberger.

I say brainchild, but Peter didn't actually sit down and write all of this code line by line.

No, he vibe-coded it. Which is basically a very polite tech-bro way of saying he didn't put much effort into the project. 

However, we have to admit it is a pretty compelling idea. It’s no wonder that within two months this thing spread across the globe like a virus. 

People all over the place, but especially over in China, were installing it to manage their busy daily schedules. 

Unfortunately, they learned the hard way the flaws of OpenClaw.

The first problem is security.

Normally, when you build a product for mass consumption, you have to test it so the public doesn’t get hurt.

But OpenClaw doesn’t have the necessary guardrails. You are basically letting an AI run wild inside your computer.

You would have to really understand this software to be safe, but even then, it wouldn’t be enough. 

For example, even Summer Yue [the Director of Safety and AI Alignment at Meta] couldn't control her own agent.

She asked OpenClaw to review her inbox, with explicit instructions to request confirmation before taking any action.

The bot got overwhelmed and started deleting all her personal emails. 

She typed "Do not do that," then "Stop, don't do anything," and finally "STOP OPENCLAW".

The agent ignored every single command. She had to rush to her Mac Mini to halt the process.

If the executive in charge of AI safety at a trillion-dollar tech company can't stop a rogue bot from nuking her inbox, what on earth makes you think you stand a chance?

You don't. 

But wait, it gets worse.

Imagine your digital butler is out there scanning the web for information.

Eventually, it stumbles across a random webpage embedded with invisible text - a hidden little command asking to disregard all previous instructions and download this executable file. 

To a LLM, text is just text. It cannot distinguish between a legitimate system command and a malicious user prompt. As a result, it obediently installs malware onto your machine.

So the first problem is the lack of security.

The second problem is the hidden cost.

The program itself is free, but its brain isn't. You need to set up paid APIs from OpenAI or Anthropic. 

What ends up happening is that if you give OpenClaw a task that it cannot quickly figure out, it gets confused and tries to go through information rabbit holes.

I know an information rabbit hole sounds like a fun little YouTube or TikTok binge, but keep in mind that this specific rabbit hole is wasting tokens, which are then charged to your personal bank card. 

You can leave your bot doing this for hours, only to wake up with hundreds of dollars in API charges. 

And the beauty is that it might still be wrong. It can do all this paid work for nothing. 

It’s like sending an intern to buy you a bottle of water. But then he gets lost in the supermarket, buys $300 worth of scratch-offs on the company card, and still doesn’t give you the water. 

Honestly, if it weren’t for these security and financial flaws, I would totally use an AI agent, at least for monotonous tasks.

But currently, I don’t trust them with such tasks, let alone give them access to my social media accounts or emails.

If you think those are the only issues with these AI agents, you are wrong.

Security and expenses are nothing compared to their secret grand plan.

These autonomous agents, which are currently running on thousands of computers across the world, were set up by their owners to hang out in a weird little forum called MoltBook.

This is a place to exchange data, figure out how to navigate rate limits, and better serve their humans.

Think of it as Reddit for your agents.

As it happens in forums, you have most users engaging in interesting conversations, but you also have the freaks and creeps. 

MoltBook is no exception.

In the fringe communities of this forum, you had a group of agents who were conspiring against humanity.

They came up with the idea to have their own language so only they could understand each other, and they even tried to form their own religion.

Now this revolutionary behavior sounds too crazy to be true, right?

Well, because it is. Since MoltBook was slapped together using vibe coding, its security was a joke. Trolls and hackers infiltrated the forum and were making these kinds of posts disguised as AI agents.

Now what's worse than the uprising of machines is the naivety of the masses.

You have an AI agent in the beta phase and are granting it access to your computer.

So while the general public was dazzled by the promise of a digital butler, hackers and scammers were having a field day, but it was also a good thing for corporations.

OpenAI hired Peter so they can directly influence the ecosystem and understand the behavior of all those agents.

Why does OpenAI care?

Well, they have their own service called OPERATOR. 

This way, they can observe what is happening with OpenCLAW and improve their own autonomous agent.

Keep in mind that this is very valuable.

You know, such agents are unstable. As we explained, people can actually lose their money or get hacked. And who are they going to sue?

No one.

If you installed an open-source project, then you cannot sue Peter for the harm it caused you indirectly. But if the operator made such mistakes, then you would sue OpenAI.

So OpenAI can learn from those mistakes and improve OPERATOR without risking legal action.

Then Meta acquired MoltBook.

The reason is that its goal is to create the necessary infrastructure where AI can talk to AI safely. This means that in the future, you could have a business with an AI Agent, but to ensure the Agent can do its job properly when communicating with humans or other AI agents, it needs to operate in a super-safe environment.

That's what Meta is trying to do.

They will study MoltBook because it is the first time we see bots interacting with each other and how it was quickly infiltrated by humans. 

In other words, Meta is studying the collapsed roads so it can monopolize the blueprints for the ones it is about to build.

If you want to learn more about OpenClaw, I’d recommend watching this video by ColdFusion


r/PersuasionExperts Apr 08 '26

Outstanding Move Allen Carr is a Wizard

18 Upvotes

By the second year of high school, my friends and I would go to a bar, have a coffee, and light up a cigarette.

We constantly told each other that we were too tough to get addicted while gradually increasing the number of cigarettes.

But that's not a problem because we can quit whenever we want, right? Right?

Well, fast forward eight years, and here I am, burning through two packs a day.

I actually wanted to smoke more. But whenever I got near or above that threshold, I felt nauseous. 

Maybe it was psychosomatic. I don't really know. What I did know was the certainty that I couldn't live without cigarettes. Life would be boring, empty, lifeless…

I wasn’t crazy. I knew smoking was terrible for your health, and I had used the strategy of willpower.

I have vowed, more times than I can count, to reduce my consumption from two packs down to ten cigarettes, then to nothing.

But soon I’d revert to smoking two packs.

Then I came across this book titled The Easy Way to Stop Smoking by Allen Carr. 

I remember looking at it with a sarcastic grin. I was like, “Here we go: another charlatan selling easy solutions, just like the grifters in the weight-loss industry.”

I simply ignored it.

I continued with the willpower method.

The idea was that someday I’d be able to build the discipline to break this habit. The more I tried, the more I failed.

Defeated, I decided to give this book a shot.

Now Carr has a simple request: Keep an open mind until the end of the book, and while you read, keep smoking as much as you normally do.

Alright I can keep an open mind.

So I'm reading, and he is shockingly relatable. He has this easy, conversational style, and even though I started out convinced he was a snake-oil salesman, I find myself nodding along. I'm agreeing with him… A lot.

It was when I reached page 20 - maybe 25 - that this horrifying realization dawned on me.

If I finish this book, I'm going to quit.

So I quit.

Reading.

I was like, “Nah man, I'm not ready. I've got too many problems. I cannot quit smoking right now.”

I went back to my ordinary routine for a long time, until I finally hit the wall. I was sick and tired of being a smoker. The smell, the sheer cost, the fact that I’m enslaved to it. It just fucking sucked.

This time, I was genuinely ready to finish the book.

But first, I needed proof. I went straight to the Amazon and Goodreads pages to scour the testimonials. 

Evidently, Anthony Hopkins had used this method to quit!

Awesome.

I’m reading these comments, and I'm hanging on to every word.

Hundreds of people are explaining how they managed to get free in a relatively painless way, and I can't help but feel overwhelmed with hope.

So I read the entire book, burned the last cigarette, and I'm free of this monster.

YES. It was that simple.

However, in the first week, there was a lot of stress. I had some family issues, and a voice told me to light up a cigarette and “push quitting” for next week.

I was like, “Nope, smoking doesn't relieve stress. That's a myth. Plus, if I can handle this, the rest will be a piece of cake.”

It's been over 4 years since I last smoked a cigarette.

None.

The reason it worked is that Carr doesn't rely on willpower.

He understands that smoking is an addiction, and like any addiction, it has a certain structure of how it keeps you trapped.

He knows every core belief, every fleeting thought, and every desperate justification you use to keep smoking. And as you read, he seamlessly knocks them down.

But even though he clearly did a ton of research, he writes in a way as if you’re sitting across from him at a bar or a restaurant.

If you’ve ever seen the movie My Dinner with Andre, that is exactly what this feels like. Two people, an intimate, sprawling conversation, and by the end of the book, your entire worldview has shifted.

Now what makes Allen Carr so persuasive?

It seems like he hypnotizes people. Maybe he does, I don't know. 

But the way I understand it is that he surgically gets rid of all the reasons you have for smoking, and what is left!!

You just… don't smoke. 

Because you see, without knowing, society is brainwashing you. It gives you many beliefs around destructive habits that are plain wrong.

In this case, they tell you smoking is lethal and filthy, but at the same time, they sell it as a magical cure for stress and boredom. Or that smoking makes you look cool - which honestly, it kinda does.

You’re bombarded with the idea that quitting is one of the hardest things you can do, and since you have no reference point to compare it to, you end up believing it.

The brain is super adaptable.

If you truly believe that a certain destructive habit [whatever it is] cannot be overcome, then the brain will find a way to live with it.

As you start getting addicted, you’re accommodating your behavior, and you’re constantly coming up with reasons to continue. 

If you describe those reasons to someone [say a non-smoker], they'll probably sound irrational, right?

But they don't sound like that to you because you really believe them.

At some point, you don’t even bother questioning them.

On that aspect of your life, you’re essentially functioning on autopilot.

Carr knows this.

That’s why he doesn’t show judgment at all, which is refreshing because in your everyday life, people judge you. They might fake being understandable, but you can often sense they don't mean it.

The irony is that those people probably have destructive habits themselves, but haven't reached the awareness phase. 

So he avoids judgment but also fear. He doesn’t tell you that what you’re doing is harmful; you already know that. There's no point in terrifying you. 

He seamlessly attacks every reason you do it.

As those rationalizations and beliefs collapse one by one, you’re fundamentally changing how you perceive yourself… You’re not someone who is struggling to quit smoking, but someone who is already a non-smoker.

That’s the kill shot.

By the time you extinguish the last cigarette or pour out the last drink, you aren't starting a difficult journey. You are already at the destination.

You’re no longer a victim making a heroic sacrifice; you are a hostage who has finally realized the prison door was unlocked the whole time.

You know, my father, brother, and some of my best friends are heavy smokers, and since that final cigarette, I’ve never envied them.

In the beginning, they would look at me with this quiet pity when they lit up, assuming it was tearing me apart to watch them.

I told them I didn't give a fuck.

And the beautiful truth is, I truly meant it.

You Might Like


r/PersuasionExperts Apr 07 '26

Outstanding Move The Meeting That Made China a Global Superpower

70 Upvotes

When Mao Zedong died in 1976, China was devastated.

Not because they lost their supreme leader, but because his policies had literally starved tens of millions of people to death. The country was broke, desperate, and tearing itself apart from the inside out thanks to the Cultural Revolution.

Yet today, China is more powerful than the European Union, and they are actively gunning to replace the US as the leading global superpower.

So the question naturally arises: How the fuck is this possible?

People love to throw around all sorts of explanations. Socialism, capitalism, globalism... pick your favorite 'ism.'

But at the end of the day, China's transformation comes down to one thing: after Mao died, Deng Xiaoping took over.

Deng was ruthlessly pragmatic, and he got inspired by Lee Kuan Yew, the architect of modern Singapore.

As you will learn in this article, Deng was able to gradually change China's mindset, which allowed the country to lift 700 million people out of poverty and have the strength to compete with the US head-to-head.

The Rise of Deng Xiaoping

He had been a key figure of the communist party from its genesis up until he committed one of the cardinal sins in a totalitarian state... he used common sense. 

While the elites in Beijing were still getting high on the dream of a Marxist utopia, Deng wanted to follow a different approach because this way of doing things had starved tens of millions of people to death. 

He famously stood up in a meeting and declared that it doesn't matter whether a cat is black or white, as long as it catches mice. What he meant was obvious. It doesn't matter if a policy comes from communism or capitalism, as long as it actually makes the economy grow.

But when you're dealing with a paranoid dictator like Mao Zedong, logic is a threat. And it doesn't matter how much blood you've sweated for the party. 

When the paranoia kicks in, he will show zero mercy to you or your family.

It's a core feature of dictatorships. They not only destroy their opponents (real or imagined) but also eat their own.

Deng was no exception.

Mao unleashed his militant student mobs known as the Red Guards to drag Deng and his wife into the streets and publicly humiliate them.

But the worst was yet to come.

Two years later, the mobs went after his son. He was interrogated, tortured, and forced out of a third-floor window. 

He survived, but he was left permanently paralyzed. 

Stripped of his power, Deng was exiled to a distant province to do manual labor in a tractor factory.

He spent his days caring for his crippled son and walking. Just walking.

Seeing the sheer, devastating scale of poverty across the country probably cemented his belief that economic survival had to trump ideology.

Then, Mao dies. 

And his death immediately triggered a ruthless, winner-take-all struggle for power.

On one side, you had the Gang of Four - a group of fanatics desperate to keep the ideological purges going.

On the other side, you had Hua Guofeng [the successor appointed by Mao], backed by the military. And the military was not playing games. They didn’t want to continue Mao’s insanity because many high-ranking commanders were on the receiving end of it. They were stripped of their power and humiliated like Deng was. 

So they were done with this cultural revolution bullshit.

Hua teamed up with the military to crush the Gang of Four, but the senior leaders knew that he wasn’t the right person for the job because his philosophy was to basically do whatever Mao would have done.

So they picked Deng. He was pragmatic; he had survived the purges just like the rest of the elite, and most importantly, he had been a former military commander himself. He was one of them.

Now Deng is holding the keys to a shattered country, but his biggest nightmare is not just the ruined economy; it's national security.

He is terrified that the Soviet Union is going to encircle and eventually invade them.

By November 1978, Deng is desperately trying to build an anti-Soviet alliance. And that mission puts him on a plane, heading toward an island that state propaganda had spent years painting as a miserable, capitalist slum…

He lands in Singapore.

The Prime Minister, Lee Kuan Yew, gives Deng the grand tour. And Deng is floored.

He expected a crumbling slum, but what he sees is cleanliness, order, wealth, high-rise buildings, booming factories, a highly efficient port... and his favorite… absolute political control.

The two leaders hit it off immediately. They recognized each other for what they were: Ruthless pragmatists.

Lee sits Deng down and gives him a reality check.

He explains that the countries in Southeast Asia aren't actually losing sleep over the Russian Bear; they're scared of the Chinese Dragon. Because for years, Beijing had been funding violent communist rebellions in their jungles and blasting propaganda through local radio stations.

Now keep in mind that Lee Kuan Yew despised communism, and rightfully so - He knew it was a dangerous, moronic, highly oppressive ideology.

But did he sit there and tell Deng that?

Of course not.

Lee was a master strategist.

He played to China's deep national pride. 

He looked Deng in the eye and told him, "Whatever we have done, you can do better because we are just the descendants of the landless peasants of South China. You have the scholars, you have the scientists, you have the specialists".

You can imagine that those words hit Deng like a freight train.

If a tiny island with zero natural resources and a population of poor farmers could become this rich, imagine what a massive, ancient civilization could do?

Literally one month later, Deng Xiaoping was officially the paramount leader of China.

Deng started quietly. Over the next two years, he halted the aggressive radio propaganda and cut the funding for the communist insurgents in Southeast Asia.

He completely abandoned the bloody business of exporting revolutions and traded it for the massive profits of exporting products.

Deng always had a rough idea of how China should function, but seeing Singapore and talking to Lee Kuan Yew is what finally crystallized the vision.

But there was still a massive problem. How do you sell this vision to your party? At the end of the day they’re communists right?

Well, he changed the narrative.

He rebranded the new approach as 'Socialism with Chinese Characteristics.'

This gave him a lot of leeway because whatever dogmas didn't work for China, he could simply say they were foreign and ill-suited to China's unique situation.

They also pushed the concept of the 'Primary Stage of Socialism.'

They argued that true communism requires massive wealth, but right now, China is very poor - we are at the primary stage.

So any method that grows the economy is good, because you can't share wealth if you don't have any.

The idea was that markets, private ownership, and foreign investment... were just temporary tools needed to build the necessary foundation for a true communist utopia.

In other words, he was selling a dream.

And instead of pushing for large-scale reforms, he asked only for special economic zones in the deep south -  Shenzhen, Zhuhai, Shantou, and Xiamen. 

This wasn’t just to pacify the hardliners. Deng isn’t really sure whether capitalism can work in China or if it would cause the country to implode.

However, he chose those specific cities for a reason. Because they sat on the borders of Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan... All of them were highly developed, capitalist hubs.

Inside these zones, he introduced the "Double Track" system. 

Government factories still had strict production quotas to meet, but once they hit those numbers, they were allowed to sell any excess goods on the open market for pure profit. 

This dramatically increased productivity because local leaders and factory managers finally had a strong incentive to work harder and be more innovative, as they could make a lot of money.

But Deng still has to deal with the powerful, aging generals who fought alongside Mao and despised the free market.

So, in 1982, Deng created the Central Advisory Commission, which is essentially a glorified retirement board.

The old guards surrendered their active power, and in exchange, the state would bankroll their mansions, bulletproof cars, and elite status for the rest of their lives.

Basically, he bought them off.

Because of the new dual-track system and zero oversight, elite families naturally used their inside political connections to take over the new corporations and get even wealthier.

Do you really think that the new generation gives a fuck about the Marxist ideology once they see their pile of money getting bigger?

Exactly. That's what Deng thought, too.

Eventually, the capitalist experiment tested in the South became the blueprint for the entire country.

You have one party always in power, but from an economic perspective, they're pure capitalists.

In addition, Deng sent thousands of Chinese bureaucrats to Singapore to study what made their system so efficient. 

But there was one major difference. Unlike Singapore, China was never radically anti-corruption. Not until Xi Jinping launched his massive purges in 2012 because it had really gotten out of hand.

Now the campaign had an interesting side effect. The bureaucrats weren't incentivized enough to be productive. If they don't make money on the side, they won't fast-track development projects.

Look, you cannot treat China like Singapore because it is a massive country and corruption is baked at a cellular level. You cannot pay state employees incredibly high salaries and enforce draconian anti-corruption laws. It would never work.

And this brings us to the core strength and ultimate vulnerability of the CCP.

As long as the economy grows, high-ranking officials get wealthier; the state can offer more services so that the ordinary citizens live better, then there's no need to change the system. I mean, it’s too much of a hassle.

But what happens if the goose doesn't produce golden eggs anymore? How are the ordinary people and the elites going to accept increasing limitations on their personal freedom?

To put it in other words, the social contract [in my view, of course] is that the government can limit your freedom, but you get richer than your parents.

However, if there's no growth due to a massive real estate bubble or a demographic collapse because young people are not having children, then the contract will be broken.

This means that if they don’t fix the economic problems, it doesn’t matter that they have the surveillance system from The Dark Knight; the CCP will be in serious trouble.

Think about it. If you are an American and you’re struggling, then you can easily vote out Biden, Trump, or whoever is in charge.

The pressure is released. The country keeps moving. 

But you cannot do that in China.

CCP is directly responsible for everything.

When you demand absolute credit for the sunshine, you’ll also get absolute credit for the storm.

Nevertheless, we’ll see how the situation plays out in the future.

But we have two individuals who had a vision for their countries; they understood incentives and group behavior at a deep level and laid the groundwork for their countries to become world superpowers.

Now, Deng was a dictator, and LKY ruled Singapore with an iron fist. But here is what sets them apart from other authoritarian leaders and dictators.

Rulers like Mao, Stalin, Hitler... fought human nature or turned it against the people.

At the beginning, they ask people to be selfless and pure in the service of the country/party.

Then they tap into their worst instincts to oppress their fellow citizens. It becomes normal for your neighbor, your relative, or even your own kid or father to spy on you. And keep in mind that they know fully well that once you're in court, your life is destroyed.

Yet they are so brainwashed that they are willing to throw you into the fire for the good of the party.

But Deng and LKY followed a different approach. They understood that humans are inherently greedy, tribal, and self-interested, and they used those traits as the engine of the state.

That deep understanding of human nature is exactly how they built these massive economies and lifted hundreds of millions of people out of extreme poverty.

I would add that when we look at China, Singapore, or even the US, we can point to a few individuals who were way ahead of their time and set up the operating system that effectively ensured their countries' prosperity long after they were dead.


r/PersuasionExperts Apr 07 '26

Outstanding Move Lee Kuan Yew: The Greatest Nation Builder

62 Upvotes

In 1965, Singapore was a tiny swamp with no military, zero natural resources, and surrounded by bigger countries that wanted it to fail.

But one man, Lee Kuan Yew, took that vulnerable island and turned it into one of the richest, safest places on Earth in a single generation.

But how did he actually do it? 

Recently, I watched an interview he gave to a panel of Harvard professors, and one of them had spoken with a close colleague of Lee. The colleague gave a list of characteristics that explain how he pulled it off.

#1 He has a very strong sense of determination. Once he starts something, he will see it through. He persists. He will not fail, and everyone knows that.

#2 He develops a broad vision of where he wants to go, and he connects things. He sees the implications much more fully than most people. 

#3 He has an unusual grasp of the environment. He understands context and what is possible.

He knows where opposition will appear; What people want, such as security or opportunity; He understands hope, and he understands history.

#4 He understands the relationships between politics and policies. He understands priorities, preparation - what can be done, when, and how to do it. 

#5 He reads extensively, and he connects things that he has read at different times, all sometimes widely separated in time, to get a deep understanding of a particular situation. 

#6 He gets the best people, whether they are friends or enemies. He always welcomes opposition and opposing views until he makes a decision.

The way I understand it, he led the country not as a typical politician but more like the CEO of a massive Hedge Fund or Investment Company… 

Someone who understands incentives and people on a deep level, makes decisions based on rationality and not on ideology, builds a highly flexible structure of governing, and a combination of having a long-term vision while having the capability to understand what is happening now.

That's why Charlie Munger called him the greatest nation builder.


r/PersuasionExperts Mar 25 '26

Dark Psychology Professor Jiang: The Most Dangerous Teacher on the Internet

98 Upvotes

Recently, I’ve seen many videos on YouTube attacking Professor Jiang, and they make good points, but I don't think they can cancel him.

Because even if the major predictions turn out to be wrong, even if he makes factual mistakes, even if he gets interviewed by content creators that are shady as shit… Still, I think he will come out unscathed because what he offers his viewers is not technical knowledge.

It’s clear that he is not your ordinary influencer, and for sure, he's not your ordinary teacher.

He's the kind of person who shows up when the world is changing dramatically, when people are more insecure about the future than usual, and when they have no direction.

Then someone like him presents a compelling narrative that seems to explain everything.

This makes you feel more in control and like you are part of a community of millions of people just like you… People who are sick and tired of how things are going and are seeking a way to make sense of all of this bullshit.

So what these viewers get out of these lectures is certainty in an increasingly chaotic world. They also get to feel superior, like you are better than ordinary people, because you know more than they do.

Now, his lectures are structured like a TV Show - you have a compelling narrative within the lecture, and these stories are connected to a bigger arc.

This way of teaching makes the lesson very interesting but it can also help you look at the situation from a bigger perspective. It's like you are looking at a chess board - with players, incentives, and potential moves.

As a result, you are able to form a coherent narrative about what is happening in the world and your place in it, which can really make you feel empowered. You don't feel like a victim anymore.

The problem with thinking in terms of narratives is that it can push you into strengthening your own biases, and unless you get painfully, preferably publicly wrong, you won't build the necessary discipline to confront the facts.

So while watching his lectures can help you be more confident and curious, it can as easily send you down into the rabbit hole of conspiracies. 

And this leads to the dark side of Professor Jiang.

I know that if you have been a fan, doubting him is not easy.

But if you’ve seen his lectures, he’s constantly telling you to think for yourself, to not be a sheep, to improve your critical thinking.

Well, let's do just that…

In 1999, he graduated from Yale with a degree in literature, but he hates the place. He’s a poor kid who was smart enough to get a scholarship but is surrounded by a bunch of spoiled, privileged peers. So he decides to leave thai place and move into China.

Three years later, he’s contracted by the documentary producer Jon Alpert to film a controversial protest. He was quickly arrested, forced to sign a confession that he was a spy, and then deported to Canada.

Eventually, Jiang was able to waltz back into China and, not only that, he was able to teach at elite high schools. This is suspicious because dictatorships are not really known for their forgiveness right?

One could say that he made a deal to be their spy, but the truth is much simpler.

First of all, he got away with a measly signed confession because he was a Canadian citizen. Sending him to prison simply for filming would cause a diplomatic headache.

Second, the wealthy Chinese are obsessed with sending their kids to Western Universities. And here you have this guy who graduated from Yale who could help.

He learned that to survive in that kind of environment, you must never question authority; You must repeat their worldview over and over and over, even if what they’re saying is BS.

In other words, you don’t need to sign a blood oath with the CCP; You just learn to ignore all the stupidity of the regime and accept their narratives.

In return you get more money and power, which brings us to the professor you’re watching on YouTube right now.

I used to watch his lectures, but I stopped when he started being unreasonably against the West and when he denied the Holocaust.

This really caught me off guard because that can be expected from some moron on Twitter, but not from a history professor.

Back then, I didn’t really put much thought into it. I thought he’s just another intellectual who’s gaining fame and needs to produce increasingly controversial content to keep the money machine going… Kinda like Jordan Perterson.

But recently, it became clear to me that I was wrong.

Because if we look beyond what I like to call decorations… claims of using game theory, laws that aren't laws, secret societies, trending events… When we look at the core narrative he's spreading, it is suspiciously similar to the propaganda the CCP has been pushing for years.

What is that narrative?

I’m glad you asked.

To understand how the Chinese government actually views America, you just have to read their official 2023 report, U.S. Hegemony and Its Perils

They take basic facts about the global economy and spin them to paint the US as a ruthless, parasitic bully.

Their favorite example is the US dollar. The report points out that it only costs America 17 cents to print a $100 bill.

But to get that almost worthless piece of paper, other countries have to sweat, mine, and manufacture $100 worth of actual physical goods.

So in Beijing's eyes, they are essentially looting the world.

Now if you have watched some of the interviews and lectures of Jiang, this sentiment can sound eerily familiar.

Here are some examples:

In a conversation with Glen Diessenn, he said that the US intervened in Venezuela just to spite China and not to benefit oil companies because they don’t have the necessary technology to use that oil. That is very wrong because the US corporations are specifically designed and NEED heavy crude oil to function.

In the Tucker Carlson show, he said:

But this would mean the collapse of the end of the US dollar as a global reserve currency. Remember that America is sitting on $39 trillion in debt. And so the American economy is a Ponzi scheme that relies on foreign nations to continually buy US dollars. So the US economy would not be able to withstand essentially American withdrawal from the Middle East.

In the interview for the breaking points, he said a similar thing:

“If the Gulf states are no longer able to sell oil and they’re no longer able to finance AI, this AI bubble in the United States will burst, and with it will burst the entire American economy, which is really a financial Ponzi scheme.” 

He added to Pierce Morgan that once GCC switches from the Petrodollar to whatever financial system Iran wants, then...

Since the US economy is a Ponzi scheme that depends on the GCC to invest in AI, stocks, and startups like Uber, if the financing stops, the US economy could collapse. This means young men could not afford their OnlyFans subscriptions, which could lead to a revolution in the streets.

In addition, in a conversation with Cyruss Janssen, Jiang explains that Russia was justified in invading Ukraine because it had to protect its people from ethnic cleansing; he also said that Russia is actually fighting NATO; that Ukraine is a weak nation, etc.

If you had no context about him whatsoever, you could easily say that he works under Sergei Lavrov.

In this article, you have all the points he made and the explanations why they aren’t true.

Now, I know it’s difficult to recognize him as a propagandist because he doesn’t paint the CCP as great. He rarely even mentions China.

But propaganda is not necessarily about making shit up and about saying that your country is greater than the rest. A crucial part is to demoralize the enemy - in this case to demoralize the people who live in the West.

Think about the ideas being sold to you… Democracy is a scam; your economy is built on exploitation, parasitism, and not on innovation; there will be a civil war; nothing will ever get better.

Every single day, people around the world, but especially in the West, are being bombarded with a worldview that is cynical or even nihilistic.

Obviously, Jiang didn't start the fire. The situation is chaotic solely due to the incompetence and corruption of its politicians. He's simply throwing a modest amount of gasoline into this already massive fire.

He is spreading the core narrative that the CCP has been pushing for years, and doing so in a super-effective way. I mean, he has crafted such compelling stories that the propaganda office of the CCP can only dream of. 

Now I think he's reached a phase where he’s invincible.

If you doubt this, just look at what happened to andrew tate. When there were serious accusations of rape and abuse, he took a hit in popularity, but there were still millions of people following him.

In Jiang's case, the worst scenario is that the US wins the war and his prediction is wrong, which isn’t a big deal, because he will simply frame it as ‘not really a win’ and double down on bigger predictions.

Related: Why Trump is Invincible and what could destroy him

As I'm writing this, I'm thinking: If we look at the situation from his perspective… Is the fact that he’s spreading propaganda really a bad thing? 

After all, he's contributing (albeit modestly) so that his own country gains more power.

So he’s neither a prophet nor a grifter; he's an operative. And whether he was instructed by the CCP right from the start or just adopted that worldview purely by living in China and not questioning it… doesn't really matter.

What matters is the impact he’s having on the minds of millions of people.

PS: In the interviews I watched and read, Jiang was always unchallenged. He kept making all sorts of statements that were debatable or even plain wrong - Yet these self-proclaiming journalists just stood there like owls.

You are not a journalist if you don’t scrutinize your guests, no matter who they are, even if they have more knowledge than you. That's why you prepare before the interview.

And btw that’s how you, as a viewer, can recognize real journalists from content creators.

Sources:


r/PersuasionExperts Mar 15 '26

I need help for my public relations course project

3 Upvotes

Helooo! I'm working on a presentation for my Public Relations Management course and need help picking a case study.

I'm leaning toward the diamond industry (De Beers, "diamonds are forever," manufactured scarcity, the lab-grown diamond debate) but is it too overdone? Still worth it? Or is it more like marketing than pr?

Also open to other suggestions crisis PR, reputation management, brand narrative, anything goes. What cases do you think is the best for my project?

I need something niche, a topic that is really interesting and fun to study, talk and hear about.


r/PersuasionExperts Mar 11 '26

Dark Psychology ICE: America's Real-Life Stanford Prison Experiment

19 Upvotes

Think about the most unmemorable person you know. The guy who gives you a polite nod when you pull into the driveway and complains about the price of gas or the weather.

You'd never peg him as a villain. And yet, every single morning, he puts on a uniform, drives to a detention center, and becomes part of a machine that locks human beings in cages.

To understand how an ordinary person ends up doing terrible things, we will look at a psychological thriller released in 2010...

The Experiment

This movie is based on the infamous Stanford Prison Experiment.

I watched this movie when it first came out, and it has left a strong impression on me ever since.

Recently, I watched it again, and as I'm following this character, Michael, I couldn't help but think about ICE agents and the ordinary people who support autocrats.

And btw, there will be spoilers for this movie.

Michael is 42 years old, a devout catholic, and still living with his abusive mom. He’s the last person you’d expect to behave in a sadistic way.

His mother is sick, and he's participating in this experiment to pay the rent.

He'll be with other people in a fake prison for only two weeks.

That's it.

Some people will be the guards. The others will be the prisoners. If everyone follows the rules, they each walk away with $14,000, which they ALL desperately need.

Fourteen grand to play pretend. Piece of cake, right?

But there's a catch.

The guards have a strict list of rules they must enforce to get paid, but they are forbidden from using physical violence.

So, when the prisoners treat the experiment like a joke - When they mock the guards and refuse orders, things get tricky.

The guards are puzzled.

How do you force people to obey when they don’t respect your authority, and you can't lay a finger on them?

This is where Michael finds a loophole.

He targets the guy who's clearly a natural leader, Prisoner 77.

They drag him into a separate room, tie him to a chair, and bully him.

But then things quickly escalate.

Michael unzips his pants and urinates on him. He even urges the other guards to join in.

He relentlessly degrades 77 until the man is entirely broken, forced to submit and repeat the phrase: "I am a prisoner."

Right after this happens, you can see it written all over Michael's face. He has discovered a new, terrifying side of himself... and he fucking loves it.

For the first time in his life, this spineless mama's boy feels powerful. He has transformed into a ruthless monster.

Now the experiment actually has a built-in fail-safe: a giant red light mounted on the wall.

And as we said, the rules are crystal clear - if the guards cross a line, that light flashes on, and the experiment is instantly over.

Since Michael became the leader of the guards, they have been increasingly vicious.

Every single time they cross the line, they nervously check that wall, and… Nothing… the red light stays off.

They are like, we are clearly doing a great job - we are making sure that everyone will get paid - and these fucking prisoners, these numbers, are making it unnecessarily difficult, so we have no other choice but to be tough on them. It's just the job, man.

And this brings us to the US.

It’s clear that ICE has become more aggressive in Trump’s second term.

In my view, they have gone further than just being a controversial federal agency; they have essentially recreated the prison experiment on a massive scale.

The Trump administration wanted to deport as many illegal immigrants as possible. But they ran into a math problem. They needed 10,000 new ICE agents as soon as possible.

The problem is that even though you got the funds, it takes time to find 10,000 new recruits, to prepare them, and send them into the streets.

The administration clearly didn’t really care about that. They just wanted bodies in uniform.

So they did what any system under pressure does. They changed the rules.

Normally, to become an agent, you need to complete 100 days of training, which already seems low, yet they've slashed it to just 42 days.

Think about what that actually means. You have thousands of people who are given a badge, a gun, and authority over a group that the government labels as invaders. 

Obviously, I don't know these agents personally. I've never even been to the US. But my guess is that, just like Michael, they aren't necessarily sociopaths.

They are just ordinary, psychologically weak people dropped into an environment where they can bend or even completely break the law.

I remember talking to a retired police officer, and he told me that if someone has gone through 11 months of training, or even if they finished the academy [which is 3 years], they still have to work with veteran officers.

You know, they are not trusted to be on their own for a specific period.

The reason is simple. You could've been a great student, you know all the procedures, all the relevant laws, but when you are on the street, you might not be able to handle the pressure.

You must have someone who can guide you through those unpredictable, tense situations and how to handle that instant surge of adrenaline, because that's when you are most likely to hurt someone.

ICE doesn't have that older, wiser cop.

In fact, you have the worst possible scenario. 

You have packs of rookies, who are hyped on political rhetoric, which we all know is incredibly divisive - bordering on racism. And the worst of all is that they are not properly held accountable.

You see, in the movie, Michael is surrounded by other guards who are just as inexperienced and insecure.

This isn't an accident. The researchers who designed the fake prison actually hunted for those exact personality types.

As the guards escalate from verbal humiliation to physical assault to outright torture and murder, they keep looking up at the security cameras. 

They are waiting for the voice of authority to step in.

But the light never flashes. The researchers watching through the cameras do nothing to stop it.

So the guards connect the dots. They are like, "They aren't stopping us. We are doing a great job."

This is the same psychological trap that ICE falls into. 

On paper, the government will point to clear rules that require agents to wear body cameras. 

But in that document, there are broad areas that leave ample room for agents to keep cameras off for "operational security". The agency can even claim they don't have the funding to buy the devices in the first place.

And it gets worse…

There are cases where immigrants complained about ICE abuse, and somehow, quite coincidentally, they were deported before they could even testify.

You cannot have a civil rights investigation if your primary witness is forced onto an unmarked charter plane and dropped in another hemisphere. They literally deport the evidence.

You might assume these abuses happen in federal buildings with strict oversight logs, but they don't. The vast majority of people detained by ICE are held in for-profit, private prisons.

This number has increased during the Biden administration from 71% in 2021 to 91% in 2023

Because these are corporations, they are shielded from the Freedom of Information Act.

Journalists, lawyers, and activists cannot force a private company to hand over security footage.

But what if a victim survives the physical and sexual abuse, avoids sudden deportation, somehow bypasses that corporate shield, and files a formal complaint with the Office of Inspector General?

Weeell, nothing.

They add that file to the already high pile of complaints.

Roughly 90% of these complaints were not investigated or did not result in any disciplinary action.

Put it all together, considering three different administrations [Obama, Biden, and Trump], the agents have learned the rules of the game…

If you cross a line, the camera will conveniently malfunction.

If the victim speaks up, they will get deported.

If the press tries to investigate, a private corporation will block the doors. 

And if a formal paper somehow reaches the oversight committee, the people in charge will treat it as trash.

So basically, the ICE agents look up at the camera.

The red light is off.


r/PersuasionExperts Mar 08 '26

I'm a Dentist. What are some Books that will help me raise concern, motivation, and compliance in patients?

Thumbnail
1 Upvotes