Imagine flying faster than the speed of sound, but instead of your aircraft creating a sometimes shockingly-loud sonic boom, it emits a much gentler thump. That’s what NASA’s X-59 aircraft is designed for – and it’s meant to usher in a future of quiet supersonic flight.
NASA test pilots Nils Larson and Jim “Clue” Less are putting this close-to-100-foot, experimental aircraft through its paces, getting it ready for the point where the agency can evaluate its quiet thump capability. Nils and Clue also helped provide input on the design of the X-59 and spent years in simulators before it took off for the first time last year.
The X-59 is the centerpiece of NASA’s Quesst mission, which aims to not just build and test the aircraft, but also collect data on how people perceive the noise it makes.
The first “A” in NASA stands for "Aeronautics,” and we can’t wait to talk about this mission and its game-changing technology. We’re here to answer your questions about the X-59, how it works, what it feels like to fly the plane, and what’s next for Quesst and for supersonic flight. Ask us anything!
NASA’s Artemis II mission successfully concluded on April 10, 2026, bringing to a close the first crewed lunar mission in more than half a century. NASA astronauts Reid Wiseman, Victor Glover, and Christina Koch, and CSA (Canadian Space Agency) astronaut Jeremy Hansen completed a nearly 10-day journey that took them 252,756 miles from home at their farthest distance from Earth.
The crew tested the spacecraft’s life support systems, confirming Orion can sustain humans in deep space. During several piloting demonstrations, crew members took manual control of the spacecraft, flying Orion to validate its handling and collect data that will guide future operations with human-rated landers during Artemis III and beyond. Artemis III will test rendezvous and docking capabilities needed to land Artemis IV astronauts on the Moon in 2028.
Artemis II represented a team of people across NASA’s centers and beyond who came together to support the four astronauts aboard and complete a successful mission. Today, we’re excited to talk to you about the process leading up to this point, early results from the mission, and next steps with future Artemis missions. Ask us anything!
We are:
Dan Florez, recovery operations test director (DF)
Susan Baggerman, Artemis II chief health and performance officer (SB)
EDIT: That's a wrap for today's AMA! Thanks to everyone for your fantastic questions. We're feeling the Moon joy! Keep following the latest mission updates on our Artemis blog and on Artemis social media!
Jonathan Lunine, chief scientist at JPL, in conversation with Sarah Al-Ahmed, host of Planetary Radio... discussing Perseverance, Europa Clipper, Titan Dragonfly and other missions. Open to anyone.
“Early cost estimates are approximately $2.1 billion, and NASA will continue refining that figure through the acquisition process,” the agency confirmed in a statement.
The agency plans to spend $640 million in fiscal 2026, $890 million in 2027, $415 million in 2028, and $180 million in 2029 on the program, according to a document sent to Congress and viewed by POLITICO. NASA will pull that money from the agency’s exploration account and from funding it received through the party-line reconciliation bill passed last year.
However, the document notes that the cost estimate does not include funding for SkyFall, the science mission that the new nuclear spacecraft will carry to Mars. NASA hasn’t released a cost estimate for SkyFall, but Mars researchers have warned it could cannibalize the agency’s science budget.
According to NASA's General Accountability Office's report on the Human Landing System, the Blue Origin Cislunar Transporter will like the Starship Propellant Depot require nobody knows but several flights of a New Glenn upper stage tanker to be filled up. The Cislunar Transporter will then need to fill up the Blue Moon Mark 2 and then be refueled a second time by a certain amount of New Glenn upper stage tankers and then travel to Near Rectilinear Halo Orbit and refuel Blue Moon Mark 2 a second time. This sounds just as complex if not more complex than the SpaceX Lunar Starship which would just need to be refueled in Low Lunar Orbit. The Spacex Starship propellant depot would also only need to be filled up once unlike Cislunar Transporter which needs to be filled up twice. Seems Blue Origin's plan is also extremely complex and threatens to derail the entire Artemis Program just like Lunar Starship.
Link to the document. See pages 7 - 9 for more details:
Tomorrow we celebrate the Viking 1 landing on Mars!! I remember it clear as day and as the first day I fell in love with Planetary’s exploration. To the point I got into scratch building space models…….. why Revell never made a Viking lander kit is beyond me. Here is my celebration of the first landing on Mars!
Annual pass holder here but new to this. planning to watch Tuesday's 5:15 PM launch from SLC-40. Visitor Complex staff have given me conflicting suggestions — LC-39 Observation Gantry, Saturn V Center, the main entrance, Cocoa Beach, or the Marriott rooftop.
Park closes at 6 PM, so I'm not sure how staying at somewhere like Saturn V would work without getting asked to leave right before or during the launch. Which spot would you recommend given that closing time?
Like the title says, LHS 1140b was recently in the news with a helium type atmosphere, potentially habitable with the right prep and infrastructure. How much has NASA done investigating and modeling colonization systems on different styles of planets? Has there been significant research on this kind of theory crafting?
If we ever send ships to Mars or outward, would we stay in “constant” contact as it traveled?
I’m watching Project Hail Mary and when Grace awakens, he’s on his own, with no backlog of years of stored messages from Earth. Would that be accurate as to how alone travelers would be?
With trips to the moon, there is a constant stream of two-way comms, albeit with the lag. Same with the probes we’ve sent to the planets and beyond (maybe not “constant” but sufficiently frequent to maintain control, send instructions, and receive data.)
So for example when the astronauts died in PHM, could the ship have sent a message back to Earth, and they could send updates to Grace, and so on? (Not literally as this is a movie, but conceptually.)
A few years ago I participated in several NASA "Send Your Name" missions and received the digital boarding passes. I also remember the NASA Frequent Flyers system, where multiple missions were combined into a space travel history with accumulated miles and mission patches.
Unfortunately, I lost the saved files and I can no longer find the old Frequent Flyers page or a way to regenerate my boarding pass.
I have already searched my email, old files, and checked the Internet Archive/Wayback Machine, but I haven't been able to recover it.
My question is mainly for someone from NASA or JPL:
Does NASA still have access to the old Frequent Flyers database, or is there any official way to retrieve a user's previous boarding pass/history?
I understand these were created as souvenirs and not as permanent accounts, but it would be amazing to recover this little piece of space history after participating in multiple missions.
If anyone from NASA knows:
whether the old system still exists somewhere internally,
whether the data was archived,
or if there is any recovery procedure,
I would really appreciate any guidance.
Thank you for all the amazing work you do, and for giving people around the world the chance to be part of these missions.
I recently got selected to interview for the Fall 2026 NASA EarthRise Developers Academy, yay!
Can anyone who has done the program and/or interviewed before shed some light on what types of questions I may be asked? I'm really nervous/excited and want to be sure I'm preparing appropriately :)
I found an old report from mid-shuttle program era NASA, among other artifacts.
I was on Facebook Marketplace looking for a desk and stumbled upon a picker selling some NASA memorabilia found in New Smyrna Beach, FL.
Image from the original Facebook Marketplace Listing.
It was all in rough condition, having been left outside. I set about a journey to preserve the documents to the best of my ability and uncover as much of the history behind them as I could.
Image from the car ride home, after extracting it from the original wet bag.
First goal was to neutralize the mold on the manual. I carefully wiped any loose spores off and treated it with an isopropyl alcohol mist, let it dry completely, then a vinegar/water bath and left it in the sun to dry for multiple hours, turning the pages every half hour. The result was a bone dry manual! After scanning it in at my local library, it now lives in a sealed comic sleeve inside a plastic box.
The only unsalvageable artifact was what we believe to be a replica war bond from either WWII or the Civil War. It was nearly unidentifiable from the amount of mold on it and it was disposed of immediately. It also wasn't in the original listing so I wasn't as precious with it.
Here are some flyby highlights:
Image of two laminated cards containing pieces of Payload Bay Liner from STS-125 Atlantis.Image of what is presumed to be an internal Lockheed Martin memo dated April 3, 1991. Image of a sealed pin containing flown metal titled "Commemorating Our Space Shuttle Program."Image of a US Air Force Information Packet containing an unclassified cropped image of the Minuteman II launching.
More images to come!
Image of the CDCB in its current state. Red sting to be added soon.
Now it all lives on the Charlie Day Conspiracy Board (CDCB) until I can unravel the mystery of who it belonged to and what their job was.
It is not my intention to sell any of these artifacts. I doubt it will be worth more monetarily than it does to myself as a newly minted Bridge Bucket Improvement Team Fan anyhows.
If anyone has any information about these artifacts, would like to lend their knowledge of the shuttle program, or is just plain interested, feel free to reach out!🧑🚀🚀⋆。°✩
This is mostly out of simple curiousity, but I was trying to learn more about the crew quarters at KSC and JSC and, while there's plenty of info and even a full 3D walkthrough for the KSC facility, anything on the JSC location is extremely difficult to find. Some stuff comes up about its energy efficiency, along with a few photos of the exterior. But are photos of the interior just, nonexistent? I almost started to wonder if it had never been used, but the Artemis II crew stayed there at least some of the time, according to this.
Anyway, maybe a long shot, but wondering if anyone knew of any additional info, photos, or even some kind of tour of the JSC facility.
I just read some great background info on why NASA lost the race for the first manned mission into space in John Logsdon’s great book - John F. Kennedy and the Race to the Moon:
But the January 31 [1961] flight with Ham aboard had landed 132 miles downrange from its target point and had subjected the chimp to a 14.7 g force on reentry, 3 g more than planned. These deviations from the flight plan were primarily the result of the overacceleration of the Redstone launcher and early firing of the spacecraft escape rocket. Even after these problems, NASA managers at the Space Task Group and some at NASA headquarters were ready to commit an astronaut to the next flight. However, “key members of von Braun’s team quickly decided that they wanted another booster test before a man could fly” and von Braun did not overrule them.