I always thought that there is a significant distinction between American preppers and European preppers. But I think there is a much deeper divide between what is "Eastern" and "Western" Europeans. And what is very interesting is how blurred the lines are. Even Germany which is by definition "a western country" has such a large legacy of both Eastern and Western cultures, simply by reference to the communist era and how much it changed Germany. But in essence, I think the divide is somewhere between Poland and Germany, with the Nordics between somewhat more "Eastern" especially when it comes to Finland. On the other spectrum, looking at Switzerland, they are in a different league when it comes to preparedness. So let's learn a bit more about each other shall we? I'll go first:
Pros of Western preppers:
Tools, gears (especially comms), financial planning, systems of response and resilience for cities, more calculated and systematic approach to prepping and a larger ecosystem of prepping as a mindset, and for the Americans, well, guns. 😄
Cons of Western preppers:
Unrealistic scenarios (a lot of doomsday preppers), very few with recent memory of traumatic experiences, untested in many circumstances, individualism above community, too gear-driven not enough skill oriented and in my humble opinion over-reliance on society as a whole in terms of lifestyle (i.e. the large consumption of heavy processed foods, as compared to the alternative of home-cooked or even self-produced foods).
Pros of Eastern preppers:
They are more rooted in a traditional lifestyle especially when it comes to food production at home, consuming more from the local sourced foods, or home cooking (especially canning and preserving). A bit more community/family driven as opposed to individualism. We still had contact with agriculture and manual labor (most of us as kids anyway) and are somewhat more inclined to this lifestyle of labor, which makes us somewhat more resilient and knowledgeable in a collapse scenario. I would add that we are used to the local black markets, haggling and bartering. We have more recent experience and consistent experience with disruption and hardship was well, the norm until recent years.
Cons of Eastern preppers:
Alcohol (specifically moonshine - which by my account many will contradict me and tell me it's a net positive and I agree, but let's put in the negative for now), corruption of the state and fighting amongst ourselves. Less reliance on authorities, they can even hinder you. Less education about prepping systems and planning, we kind of do it by "that's how it was done in the past". We do not prep that much for contingency (i.e. back-up water, plumbing and electricity), which are more accessible nowadays. And of course there are those that share the border with Russia.
One last important distinction, which I hope is relevant. Without referring to a specific scenario, I think people living in cities in EE have a back-up to move to the countryside, where many of our relatives (especially parents) live and where we have the necessary tools and staples to run autonomously from the grid for at least a while longer, whereas I feel WE city dwellers are a bit more compromised.